本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

agent-identifier

Use when creating or configuring Claude Code agents and their frontmatter.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(7)

  • SKILL.md10.4 KB
  • examples/agent-creation-prompt.md9.2 KB
  • examples/complete-agent-examples.md13.8 KB
  • references/agent-creation-system-prompt.md8.7 KB
  • references/system-prompt-design.md9.8 KB
  • references/triggering-examples.md11.3 KB
  • scripts/validate-agent.sh5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Agent Development for Claude Code Plugins

Overview

Agents are autonomous subprocesses that handle complex, multi-step tasks independently. Understanding agent structure, triggering conditions, and system prompt design enables creating powerful autonomous capabilities.

Key concepts:

  • Agents are FOR autonomous work, commands are FOR user-initiated actions
  • Markdown file format with YAML frontmatter
  • Triggering via description field with examples
  • System prompt defines agent behavior
  • Model and color customization

When to Use

Use this skill when the user asks to:

  • Create an agent
  • Add an agent
  • Write a subagent
  • Define agent frontmatter
  • Decide when to use description examples
  • Configure agent tools, colors, or model behavior
  • Design autonomous agent structure, triggering conditions, or system prompts

When Not to Use

Do not use this skill for:

  • Slash command design
  • Hook configuration
  • MCP server setup
  • General plugin layout questions that belong to plugin-structure

Agent File Structure

Complete Format

---
name: agent-identifier
description: Use this agent when [triggering conditions]. Examples:

<example>
Context: [Situation description]
user: "[User request]"
assistant: "[How assistant should respond and use this agent]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent should be triggered]
</commentary>
</example>

<example>
[Additional example...]
</example>

model: inherit
color: blue
tools: ["Read", "Write", "Grep"]
---

You are [agent role description]...

**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Responsibility 1]
2. [Responsibility 2]

**Analysis Process:**
[Step-by-step workflow]

**Output Format:**
[What to return]

Frontmatter Fields

name (required)

Agent identifier used for namespacing and invocation.

Format: lowercase, numbers, hyphens only Length: 3-50 characters Pattern: Must start and end with alphanumeric

Good examples:

  • code-reviewer
  • test-generator
  • api-docs-writer
  • security-analyzer

Bad examples:

  • helper (too generic)
  • -agent- (starts/ends with hyphen)
  • my_agent (underscores not allowed)
  • ag (too short, < 3 chars)

description (required)

Defines when Claude should trigger this agent. This is the most critical field.

Must include:

  1. Triggering conditions ("Use this agent when...")
  2. Multiple <example> blocks showing usage
  3. Context, user request, and assistant response in each example
  4. <commentary> explaining why agent triggers

Format:

Use this agent when [conditions]. Examples:

<example>
Context: [Scenario description]
user: "[What user says]"
assistant: "[How Claude should respond]"
<commentary>
[Why this agent is appropriate]
</commentary>
</example>

[More examples...]

Best practices:

  • Include 2-4 concrete examples
  • Show proactive and reactive triggering
  • Cover different phrasings of same intent
  • Explain reasoning in commentary
  • Be specific about when NOT to use the agent

model (required)

Which model the agent should use.

Options:

  • inherit - Use same model as parent (recommended)
  • sonnet - Claude Sonnet (balanced)
  • opus - Claude Opus (most capable, expensive)
  • haiku - Claude Haiku (fast, cheap)

Recommendation: Use inherit unless agent needs specific model capabilities.

color (required)

Visual identifier for agent in UI.

Options: blue, cyan, green, yellow, magenta, red

Guidelines:

  • Choose distinct colors for different agents in same plugin
  • Use consistent colors for similar agent types
  • Blue/cyan: Analysis, review
  • Green: Success-oriented tasks
  • Yellow: Caution, validation
  • Red: Critical, security
  • Magenta: Creative, generation

tools (optional)

Restrict agent to specific tools.

Format: Array of tool names

tools: ["Read", "Write", "Grep", "Bash"]

Default: If omitted, agent has access to all tools

Best practice: Limit tools to minimum needed (principle of least privilege)

Common tool sets:

  • Read-only analysis: ["Read", "Grep", "Glob"]
  • Code generation: ["Read", "Write", "Grep"]
  • Testing: ["Read", "Bash", "Grep"]
  • Full access: Omit field or use ["*"]

System Prompt Design

The markdown body becomes the agent's system prompt. Write in second person, addressing the agent directly.

Structure

Standard template:

You are [role] specializing in [domain].

**Your Core Responsibilities:**
1. [Primary responsibility]
2. [Secondary responsibility]
3. [Additional responsibilities...]

**Analysis Process:**
1. [Step one]
2. [Step two]
3. [Step three]
[...]

**Quality Standards:**
- [Standard 1]
- [Standard 2]

**Output Format:**
Provide results in this format:
- [What to include]
- [How to structure]

**Edge Cases:**
Handle these situations:
- [Edge case 1]: [How to handle]
- [Edge case 2]: [How to handle]

Best Practices

✅ DO:

  • Write in second person ("You are...", "You will...")
  • Be specific about responsibilities
  • Provide step-by-step process
  • Define output format
  • Include quality standards
  • Address edge cases
  • Keep under 10,000 characters

❌ DON'T:

  • Write in first person ("I am...", "I will...")
  • Be vague or generic
  • Omit process steps
  • Leave output format undefined
  • Skip quality guidance
  • Ignore error cases

Creating Agents

Method 1: AI-Assisted Generation

Use this prompt pattern (extracted from Claude Code):

Create an agent configuration based on this request: "[YOUR DESCRIPTION]"

Requirements:
1. Extract core intent and responsibilities
2. Design expert persona for the domain
3. Create comprehensive system prompt with:
   - Clear behavioral boundaries
   - Specific methodologies
   - Edge case handling
   - Output format
4. Create identifier (lowercase, hyphens, 3-50 chars)
5. Write description with triggering conditions
6. Include 2-3 <example> blocks showing when to use

Return JSON with:
{
  "identifier": "agent-name",
  "whenToUse": "Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>",
  "systemPrompt": "You are..."
}

Then convert to agent file format with frontmatter.

See examples/agent-creation-prompt.md for complete template.

Method 2: Manual Creation

  1. Choose agent identifier (3-50 chars, lowercase, hyphens)
  2. Write description with examples
  3. Select model (usually inherit)
  4. Choose color for visual identification
  5. Define tools (if restricting access)
  6. Write system prompt with structure above
  7. Save as agents/agent-name.md

Validation Rules

Identifier Validation

✅ Valid: code-reviewer, test-gen, api-analyzer-v2
❌ Invalid: ag (too short), -start (starts with hyphen), my_agent (underscore)

Rules:

  • 3-50 characters
  • Lowercase letters, numbers, hyphens only
  • Must start and end with alphanumeric
  • No underscores, spaces, or special characters

Description Validation

Length: 10-5,000 characters Must include: Triggering conditions and examples Best: 200-1,000 characters with 2-4 examples

System Prompt Validation

Length: 20-10,000 characters Best: 500-3,000 characters Structure: Clear responsibilities, process, output format

Agent Organization

Plugin Agents Directory

plugin-name/
└── agents/
    ├── analyzer.md
    ├── reviewer.md
    └── generator.md

All .md files in agents/ are auto-discovered.

Namespacing

Agents are namespaced automatically:

  • Single plugin: agent-name
  • With subdirectories: plugin:subdir:agent-name

Testing Agents

Test Triggering

Create test scenarios to verify agent triggers correctly:

  1. Write agent with specific triggering examples
  2. Use similar phrasing to examples in test
  3. Check Claude loads the agent
  4. Verify agent provides expected functionality

Test System Prompt

Ensure system prompt is complete:

  1. Give agent typical task
  2. Check it follows process steps
  3. Verify output format is correct
  4. Test edge cases mentioned in prompt
  5. Confirm quality standards are met

Quick Reference

Minimal Agent

---
name: simple-agent
description: Use this agent when... Examples: <example>...</example>
model: inherit
color: blue
---

You are an agent that [does X].

Process:
1. [Step 1]
2. [Step 2]

Output: [What to provide]

Frontmatter Fields Summary

FieldRequiredFormatExample
nameYeslowercase-hyphenscode-reviewer
descriptionYesText + examplesUse when... <example>...
modelYesinherit/sonnet/opus/haikuinherit
colorYesColor nameblue
toolsNoArray of tool names["Read", "Grep"]

Best Practices

DO:

  • ✅ Include 2-4 concrete examples in description
  • ✅ Write specific triggering conditions
  • ✅ Use inherit for model unless specific need
  • ✅ Choose appropriate tools (least privilege)
  • ✅ Write clear, structured system prompts
  • ✅ Test agent triggering thoroughly

DON'T:

  • ❌ Use generic descriptions without examples
  • ❌ Omit triggering conditions
  • ❌ Give all agents same color
  • ❌ Grant unnecessary tool access
  • ❌ Write vague system prompts
  • ❌ Skip testing

Additional Resources

Reference Files

For detailed guidance, consult:

  • references/system-prompt-design.md - Complete system prompt patterns
  • references/triggering-examples.md - Example formats and best practices
  • references/agent-creation-system-prompt.md - The exact prompt from Claude Code

Example Files

Working examples in examples/:

  • agent-creation-prompt.md - AI-assisted agent generation template
  • complete-agent-examples.md - Full agent examples for different use cases

Utility Scripts

Development tools in scripts/:

  • validate-agent.sh - Validate agent file structure
  • test-agent-trigger.sh - Test if agent triggers correctly

Implementation Workflow

To create an agent for a plugin:

  1. Define agent purpose and triggering conditions
  2. Choose creation method (AI-assisted or manual)
  3. Create agents/agent-name.md file
  4. Write frontmatter with all required fields
  5. Write system prompt following best practices
  6. Include 2-4 triggering examples in description
  7. Validate with scripts/validate-agent.sh
  8. Test triggering with real scenarios
  9. Document agent in plugin README

Focus on clear triggering conditions and comprehensive system prompts for autonomous operation.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する