本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

causal-inference-mixtape

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement a DiD regression", "write a causal inference pipeline", "set up an event study", "implement instrumental variables", "run a regression discontinuity design", "build a synthetic control model", "implement propensity score matching", "write parallel trends test", "implement Bacon decomposition", or needs code templates for causal inference methods in Python, R, or Stata. Based on Scott Cunningham's Causal Inference: The Mixtape.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md5.9 KB
  • prompts/01-implement-method.md2.6 KB
  • prompts/02-robustness-checks.md3.4 KB
  • README-original.md4.6 KB
  • references/method-patterns.md12.5 KB
  • references/r-stata-comparison.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Causal Inference: The Mixtape — Code Skill

Practitioner-oriented causal inference skill built from Scott Cunningham's Causal Inference: The Mixtape repository. Covers 10 identification strategies with ready-to-run code templates in Python, R, and Stata.


Methods Covered

MethodPythonRStataReference
OLS / Regressionstatsmodelsestimatrreg/reghdfereferences/method-patterns.md §1
Difference-in-Differencesstatsmodels + C()lfe/fixestxtreg/reghdfereferences/method-patterns.md §2
Event Study (Dynamic DiD)manual lead/lagestimatrreghdfereferences/method-patterns.md §3
Staggered DiD / TWFEstatsmodelsbacondecompbacondecompreferences/method-patterns.md §4
Regression Discontinuitystatsmodels polynomialrdrobustrdplot/rdrobustreferences/method-patterns.md §5
Instrumental Variableslinearmodels IV2SLSAER/ivregivregress 2slsreferences/method-patterns.md §6
Synthetic Controlrpy2 → R SynthSynth + SCtoolssynthreferences/method-patterns.md §7
Matching / PSM / IPWmanual logit + weightsMatchIt + Zeligteffects/cemreferences/method-patterns.md §8
DAGs / Collider Biasdagitty (conceptual)dagitty/ggdag—references/method-patterns.md §9
Randomization Inferencepermutation loopri2ritestreferences/method-patterns.md §10

Core Workflow

Implement a Causal Method

  1. Identify the method from the table above
  2. Load the appropriate template from references/method-patterns.md
  3. Adapt variable names, fixed effects, and clustering to the user's data
  4. Add robustness checks (parallel trends for DiD, McCrary for RDD, first-stage F for IV)

Choose the Right Language

ScenarioRecommendation
ML pipeline integrationPython (statsmodels + linearmodels)
Synthetic ControlR (Synth package) or Stata (synth) — Python lacks mature implementation
Bacon decompositionR (bacondecomp) or Stata — no Python equivalent
Publication-ready tablesStata (outreg2/esttab) or R (stargazer/modelsummary)
Coarsened Exact MatchingStata (cem) or R (MatchIt) — no Python equivalent
Quick prototypingPython with statsmodels

Cross-Language Equivalents

TaskPythonRStata
OLS with robust SEsmf.ols().fit(cov_type='HC1')lm_robust()reg y x, robust
Cluster SEfit(cov_type='cluster', cov_kwds={'groups': g})`felm(y ~ x0
Two-way FEC(id) + C(time) in formula`felm(y ~ xid + time)`
IV / 2SLSIV2SLS.from_formula('y ~ 1 + exog + [endog ~ inst]')`ivreg(y ~ exoginst)`
DiDC(treat)*C(post)treat:post in formuladid_multiplegt or interaction

Key Python Patterns

DiD with Cluster-Robust SE

import statsmodels.formula.api as smf

model = smf.ols('y ~ C(treated)*C(post) + controls', data=df)
results = model.fit(cov_type='cluster', cov_kwds={'groups': df['firm_id']})

Event Study (Lead/Lag)

# Create relative time dummies
for k in range(-4, 5):
    col = f'rel_{k}' if k >= 0 else f'rel_m{abs(k)}'
    df[col] = (df['relative_time'] == k).astype(int)

# Drop t=-1 as reference
formula = 'y ~ ' + ' + '.join([c for c in rel_cols if c != 'rel_m1']) + ' + C(id) + C(year)'

IV / 2SLS

from linearmodels.iv import IV2SLS

model = IV2SLS.from_formula('y ~ 1 + exog + [endog ~ instrument]', data=df)
results = model.fit(cov_type='clustered', clusters=df['cluster_var'])

Robustness Check Patterns

MethodRequired Checks
DiDParallel trends (event study plot), placebo treatment dates
RDDMcCrary density test, bandwidth robustness (half/double IK optimal), polynomial robustness
IVFirst-stage F > 10, exclusion restriction argument, over-identification test
Synthetic ControlPre-treatment RMSPE, placebo distribution, leave-one-out
MatchingCovariate balance table, caliper sensitivity

Common Pitfalls

  1. TWFE with staggered treatment — standard two-way FE is biased when treatment timing varies. Use Bacon decomposition or Sun & Abraham / Callaway & Sant'Anna estimators.
  2. Synthetic Control with many treated units — the Synth package handles one treated unit. For multiple, use augmented synthetic control or stacked approach.
  3. RDD without McCrary test — always test for manipulation at the cutoff before estimating.
  4. IV weak instruments — report first-stage F-statistic. Below 10 indicates weak instrument bias.
  5. Python Synth gap — no mature Python Synth package exists. Use rpy2 to call R's Synth from Python.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/method-patterns.md — Detailed code templates for all 10 methods with full examples
  • references/r-stata-comparison.md — Cross-language package comparison and method coverage gaps

Prompt Files

  • prompts/01-implement-method.md — Copy-paste prompt for implementing any causal method
  • prompts/02-robustness-checks.md — Copy-paste prompt for generating robustness check code

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する