本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Checking ChEMBL for Structured SAR Data

Check if medicinal chemistry papers are in ChEMBL database to access curated bioactivity data

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md13.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ 来源仓库: https://github.com/kthorn/research-superpower 项目名称: research-superpower 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02 声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 -->

Checking ChEMBL for Structured SAR Data

Overview

ChEMBL is a manually curated database of ~99,000 medicinal chemistry papers with extracted, standardized bioactivity data. If a paper is in ChEMBL, you can access structured data without parsing PDFs.

Core principle: Check ChEMBL first for medicinal chemistry papers. Curated data is more reliable than table parsing.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • Paper describes medicinal chemistry / drug discovery
  • Abstract mentions compound series, SAR, or activity data
  • Paper has IC50, MIC, Ki, EC50, or other bioactivity measurements
  • Before attempting to extract data from tables/figures
  • Paper scored ≥ 7 in relevance evaluation

When NOT to use:

  • Non-medicinal chemistry papers (cell biology, genomics, etc.)
  • Papers without activity measurements
  • Reviews without primary data
  • Very recent papers (< 6 months, likely not curated yet)

ChEMBL API Basics

Base URL: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/

No authentication required

CRITICAL: ChEMBL can ONLY be queried by DOI, NOT by PMID

  • The API returns PMID in results, but does not accept it as a query parameter
  • Always use DOI for lookups: ?doi=10.1234/example
  • PMID queries will return 0 results even if paper exists in ChEMBL

Two-step process:

  1. Check if paper (by DOI) is in ChEMBL
  2. If yes, retrieve bioactivity data

Step 1: Check if Paper in ChEMBL

Query by DOI (ONLY method that works):

curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/document.json?doi=DOI"

⚠️ IMPORTANT: Must use DOI, not PMID

# ✅ CORRECT - Use DOI
doi="10.1021/jm401507s"
curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/document.json?doi=$doi"

# ❌ WRONG - PMID won't work (will return 0 results)
pmid="24446688"
curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/document.json?pubmed_id=$pmid"  # Does NOT work!

If you only have PMID: Fetch DOI from PubMed first, then query ChEMBL with the DOI.

Response structure:

{
  "documents": [
    {
      "document_chembl_id": "CHEMBL3120156",
      "doi": "10.1021/jm401507s",
      "title": "Discovery and development of simeprevir (TMC435), a HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor.",
      "abstract": "Hepatitis C virus is a blood-borne infection...",
      "pubmed_id": 24446688,
      "journal": "J Med Chem",
      "year": 2014,
      "doc_type": "PUBLICATION"
    }
  ],
  "page_meta": {
    "total_count": 1
  }
}

Key fields:

  • document_chembl_id - Use this to retrieve activity data
  • doc_type - "PUBLICATION" (from literature) or "DATASET" (deposited)
  • pubmed_id - PMID is in the response, but cannot be used to query ChEMBL
  • If total_count = 0, paper not in ChEMBL

Parse response:

response=$(curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/document.json?doi=$doi")

if [ $(echo "$response" | jq -r '.page_meta.total_count') -gt 0 ]; then
  chembl_id=$(echo "$response" | jq -r '.documents[0].document_chembl_id')
  echo "✓ Found in ChEMBL: $chembl_id"
else
  echo "✗ Not in ChEMBL"
fi

Step 2: Get Activity Data Count

Query activity endpoint:

curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=CHEMBL3120156&limit=1"

Extract total count:

activity_url="https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=$chembl_id&limit=1"
activity_count=$(curl -s "$activity_url" | jq -r '.page_meta.total_count')

echo "→ $activity_count bioactivity data points"

Step 3: Report to User and Update Summary

Report immediately:

📄 [15/127] Screening: "Discovery and development of simeprevir"
   Abstract score: 9 → Fetching full text...
   ✓ ChEMBL: CHEMBL3120156 (101 activity data points)
   → IC50 data for HCV NS3 protease inhibitors available

Add to SUMMARY.md:

### [Discovery and development of simeprevir (TMC435), a HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor](https://doi.org/10.1021/jm401507s) (Score: 9)

**DOI:** [10.1021/jm401507s](https://doi.org/10.1021/jm401507s)
**PMID:** [24446688](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24446688/)
**ChEMBL:** [CHEMBL3120156](https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/document_report_card/CHEMBL3120156/) (101 data points)

**Key Findings:**
- IC50 data for HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitors (from ChEMBL)
- Lead compound simeprevir (TMC435) approved for HCV treatment
- Structures and full activity data: [ChEMBL API](https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=CHEMBL3120156)

**ChEMBL Activity Summary:**
- IC50 values for HCV NS3/4A protease
- PK parameters (AUC, Cmax, clearance)
- DMPK assays (metabolic stability, permeability)

Always include ChEMBL status:

  • If found: Add ChEMBL ID with link and data point count
  • If not found: Note "Not in ChEMBL" (still valuable information)

Step 4: Update Tracking Files

Add to papers-reviewed.json:

{
  "10.1021/jm401507s": {
    "pmid": "24446688",
    "status": "relevant",
    "score": 9,
    "chembl_id": "CHEMBL3120156",
    "chembl_activities": 101,
    "has_structured_data": true
  }
}

Optional: Extract Structured Data

For papers with rich ChEMBL data (>20 activities), consider extracting:

# Get all IC50 data
curl -s "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=CHEMBL3120156&standard_type=IC50&limit=100" > chembl_data.json

# Summary statistics
jq '[.activities[] | .standard_value | tonumber] | "Min: \(min), Max: \(max), Count: \(length)"' chembl_data.json

Report to user:

📊 ChEMBL data extracted:
   - IC50 values for HCV NS3/4A protease
   - All structures downloaded
   - Data saved to: chembl_CHEMBL3120156_ic50.json

Integration with Other Skills

During evaluating-paper-relevance workflow:

  1. After abstract screening (score ≥7)
  2. Before deep dive into full text
  3. Check ChEMBL using this skill
  4. If found:
    • Note ChEMBL ID in SUMMARY.md
    • Extract activity data (faster than PDF parsing)
    • Still fetch full text for methods, discussion, context
  5. If not found:
    • Proceed with normal PDF evaluation
    • Parse tables manually if needed

Workflow integration point:

Stage 2: Deep Dive
├─ 1. Fetch Full Text (PMC → DOI → Unpaywall)
├─ 1.5. Check ChEMBL ← ADD THIS STEP
│   ├─ Query by DOI
│   ├─ If found: note ChEMBL ID + activity count
│   └─ Report to user
├─ 2. Scan for Relevant Content
└─ 3. Extract Findings

Common Activity Types in ChEMBL

TypeDescriptionUnits
IC50Half-maximal inhibitory concentrationnM, µM
MICMinimum inhibitory concentrationµg/mL, nM
KiInhibition constantnM, µM
EC50Half-maximal effective concentrationnM, µM
KdDissociation constantnM, µM
PotencyGeneral potency measurementVarious

Filter by activity type:

curl "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=ID&standard_type=MIC"

ChEMBL Coverage

~99,000 documents (as of 2025)

Well represented:

  • Medicinal chemistry papers
  • SAR studies with compound series
  • Lead optimization campaigns
  • Papers in major journals (J Med Chem, Bioorg Med Chem, Eur J Med Chem, etc.)

Poorly represented:

  • Very recent papers (6-12 month curation lag)
  • Papers without extractable structures/activities
  • Non-drug-discovery research
  • Purely mechanistic studies

Typical hit rate:

  • ~30-40% of medicinal chemistry papers
  • Higher for SAR-focused journals

Advantages of ChEMBL Data

vs. PDF table parsing:

  • ✓ Structures already extracted (SMILES format)
  • ✓ Units standardized (all IC50s in nM)
  • ✓ Values validated and curated
  • ✓ Machine-readable JSON
  • ✓ No OCR errors
  • ✓ Linked to assay protocols
  • ✓ Queryable (filter by activity range, target, etc.)

When to still use PDF:

  • Full experimental procedures
  • Synthesis routes
  • Papers not in ChEMBL
  • Very recent papers
  • Context and interpretation

Progress Reporting

CRITICAL: Report ChEMBL check for every relevant paper

Example workflow report:

📄 [15/50] Screening: "Novel MmpL3 inhibitors..."
   Abstract score: 8 → Checking ChEMBL...
   ✓ ChEMBL: CHEMBL3456789 (34 data points)
   → Fetching full text...
   → Added to SUMMARY.md with ChEMBL link

For papers not in ChEMBL:

📄 [16/50] Screening: "Another paper..."
   Abstract score: 9 → Checking ChEMBL...
   ✗ Not in ChEMBL (likely too recent or review paper)
   → Fetching full text via Unpaywall...

Helper Script Pattern

For research sessions with many medicinal chemistry papers:

Create check_chembl.py:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import requests
import json
import sys

def check_chembl(doi):
    """Check if DOI is in ChEMBL and return summary

    IMPORTANT: Must use DOI, not PMID. ChEMBL API does not accept PMID queries.
    """

    # Query document (ONLY works with DOI)
    doc_url = f"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/document.json?doi={doi}"
    try:
        doc_response = requests.get(doc_url, timeout=10).json()
    except:
        return None

    # Check if found
    if doc_response.get('page_meta', {}).get('total_count', 0) == 0:
        return {'in_chembl': False}

    doc = doc_response['documents'][0]
    chembl_id = doc['document_chembl_id']

    # Get activity count
    act_url = f"https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id={chembl_id}&limit=1"
    try:
        act_response = requests.get(act_url, timeout=10).json()
        activity_count = act_response.get('page_meta', {}).get('total_count', 0)
    except:
        activity_count = 0

    return {
        'in_chembl': True,
        'chembl_id': chembl_id,
        'activity_count': activity_count,
        'doc_type': doc.get('doc_type'),
        'title': doc.get('title')
    }

if __name__ == "__main__":
    doi = sys.argv[1]
    result = check_chembl(doi)

    if result and result['in_chembl']:
        print(f"✓ {result['chembl_id']} ({result['activity_count']} activities)")
    else:
        print("✗ Not in ChEMBL")

Usage:

python3 check_chembl.py "10.1021/jm401507s"
# Output: ✓ CHEMBL3120156 (101 activities)

Common Mistakes

Querying by PMID: Using PMID instead of DOI → Always returns 0 results, ChEMBL only accepts DOI queries Skipping ChEMBL check: Not checking medicinal chemistry papers → Missing structured data that's already extracted Checking non-medchem papers: Checking genomics/cell biology papers → Wasting time, won't be in ChEMBL Not reporting status: Silent ChEMBL checks → User can't see what's happening Not adding to SUMMARY.md: Forgetting to include ChEMBL ID → Harder for user to access data later Only using ChEMBL: Not fetching full text when paper in ChEMBL → Missing context, methods, discussion Parsing PDFs when in ChEMBL: Manually extracting tables when structured data available → Wasting time and introducing errors

Quick Reference

TaskCommand
Check if DOI in ChEMBLcurl "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/document.json?doi=DOI"
Get activity countcurl "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=ID&limit=1"
Get all activitiescurl "https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/activity.json?document_chembl_id=ID&limit=1000"
Filter by activity typecurl "...activity.json?document_chembl_id=ID&standard_type=MIC"
ChEMBL paper pagehttps://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/document_report_card/CHEMBL_ID/

Permissions

Add to .claude/settings.local.json.template:

"Bash(curl*https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/api/data/*)",
"WebFetch(domain:www.ebi.ac.uk)"

Success Criteria

ChEMBL check successful when:

  • Every medicinal chemistry paper (score ≥7) checked
  • ChEMBL status reported to user immediately
  • ChEMBL ID added to SUMMARY.md (if found)
  • Activity count noted in summary
  • papers-reviewed.json updated with ChEMBL status

Next Steps

After checking ChEMBL:

  • If found: Consider extracting structured data for highly relevant papers (≥9)
  • Continue with full text evaluation for context
  • For papers not in ChEMBL: Proceed with normal PDF/table parsing
  • Update SUMMARY.md with all findings

Resources

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する