本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

citation-verification

This skill provides reference guidance for citation verification in academic writing. Use when the user asks about "citation verification best practices", "how to verify references", "preventing fake citations", or needs guidance on citation accuracy. This skill supports ml-paper-writing by providing detailed verification principles and common error patterns.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(9)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB
  • references/api-usage.md8.1 KB
  • references/common-errors.md8.4 KB
  • references/README.md2.0 KB
  • references/verification-rules.md9.8 KB
  • scripts/api-clients.py16.3 KB
  • scripts/format-checker.py18.1 KB
  • scripts/README.md2.2 KB
  • scripts/verify-citations.py21.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Citation Verification Reference Guide

A reference guide for citation verification in academic paper writing, providing verification principles and best practices.

Core Principle: Proactively verify every citation during the writing process using WebSearch and Google Scholar.

Core Problems

Citation issues in academic papers seriously impact research integrity:

  1. Fake citations - Citing non-existent papers (common issue with AI-generated citations)
  2. Incorrect information - Mismatched authors, titles, years, etc.
  3. Inconsistent formatting - Mixed citation formats
  4. Missing citations - Referenced but uncited work

These issues can lead to:

  • Paper rejection or retraction
  • Damage to academic reputation
  • Reviewers questioning research rigor

Special risk with AI-assisted writing: AI-generated citations have approximately 40% error rate; every citation must be verified via WebSearch.

Verification Principles

This skill provides verification principles based on WebSearch and Google Scholar:

1. Proactive Verification (Verify During Writing)

Core idea: Verify immediately when adding a citation, rather than checking after writing is complete.

  • Search for the paper via WebSearch each time a citation is needed
  • Confirm the paper exists on Google Scholar
  • Add to bibliography only after verification passes

2. Google Scholar Verification

Why Google Scholar:

  • Most comprehensive academic literature coverage
  • Provides citation count (credibility indicator)
  • Directly provides BibTeX format
  • Free and no API required

Verification steps:

  1. WebSearch query: "site:scholar.google.com [paper title] [first author]"
  2. Confirm the paper appears in results
  3. Check citation count (abnormally low counts may indicate issues)
  4. Click "Cite" to get BibTeX

3. Information Matching Verification

Information that must match:

  • Title (minor differences allowed, e.g., capitalization)
  • Authors (at least the first author must match)
  • Year (±1 year difference allowed, considering preprints)
  • Publication venue (conference/journal name)

4. Claim Verification

Key principle: When citing a specific claim, you must confirm the claim actually appears in the paper.

  • Use WebSearch to access the paper PDF
  • Search for relevant keywords
  • Confirm the accuracy of the claim
  • Record the section/page where the claim appears

Verification Workflow

Integration into Writing Process

Need a citation during writing
    ↓
WebSearch to find the paper
    ↓
Google Scholar to verify existence
    ↓
Confirm paper details
    ↓
Get BibTeX
    ↓
(If citing a specific claim) Verify the claim
    ↓
Add to bibliography

Key point: Verification is part of the writing process, not a separate post-processing step.

Usage Guide

Using with ml-paper-writing

The verification principles of this skill are integrated into the Citation Workflow of the ml-paper-writing skill.

Auto-trigger: Citation verification is automatically executed when writing papers with the ml-paper-writing skill.

Manual reference: Refer to this skill when you need detailed verification principles.

Verification Step Example

Scenario: Need to cite the Transformer paper

Step 1: WebSearch lookup
Query: "Attention is All You Need Vaswani 2017"
Result: Found multiple sources for the paper

Step 2: Google Scholar verification
Query: "site:scholar.google.com Attention is All You Need Vaswani"
Result: ✅ Paper exists, 50,000+ citations, NeurIPS 2017

Step 3: Confirm details
- Title: "Attention is All You Need"
- Authors: Vaswani, Ashish; Shazeer, Noam; Parmar, Niki; ...
- Year: 2017
- Venue: NeurIPS (NIPS)

Step 4: Get BibTeX
- Click "Cite" on Google Scholar
- Select BibTeX format
- Copy BibTeX entry

Step 5: Add to bibliography
- Paste into .bib file
- Use \cite{vaswani2017attention} in the paper

Handling Verification Failures

If the paper cannot be found on Google Scholar:

  1. Check spelling - Is the title or author name correct?
  2. Try different queries - Use different keyword combinations
  3. Find alternative sources - Try arXiv, DOI
  4. Mark as pending - Use [CITATION NEEDED] marker
  5. Notify the user - Clearly state the citation cannot be verified

If information doesn't match:

  1. Confirm the source - Did you find the correct paper?
  2. Check versions - Preprint vs. published version
  3. Update information - Use the most accurate version
  4. Record discrepancies - Note the reason for differences

Best Practices

Preventing Fake Citations

  1. Never generate citations from memory - AI-generated citations have 40% error rate
  2. Use WebSearch to find - Verify every citation through WebSearch
  3. Confirm on Google Scholar - Verify paper existence on Google Scholar
  4. Verify promptly - Verify when adding citations, don't wait until finished

Handling Verification Failures

  1. Don't guess - If you can't find the paper, don't fabricate information
  2. Mark clearly - Use [CITATION NEEDED] to mark explicitly
  3. Notify the user - Clearly state which citations cannot be verified
  4. Provide reasons - Explain why verification failed (not found, info mismatch, etc.)

Improving Verification Accuracy

  1. Complete queries - Include title, author, year
  2. Check citation count - Citation count on Google Scholar is a credibility indicator
  3. Confirm venue - Verify conference/journal name is correct
  4. Verify claims - When citing specific claims, confirm they exist in the paper

Common Pitfalls

❌ Wrong approach:

  • Generating BibTeX from memory
  • Skipping Google Scholar verification
  • Assuming a paper exists
  • Not marking unverifiable citations

✅ Correct approach:

  • Search every citation with WebSearch
  • Confirm on Google Scholar
  • Copy BibTeX from Google Scholar
  • Clearly mark unverifiable citations

Summary

Core Principle: Proactively verify every citation during the writing process using WebSearch and Google Scholar.

Key Steps:

  1. WebSearch to find the paper
  2. Google Scholar to verify existence
  3. Confirm details
  4. Get BibTeX
  5. Verify claims (if needed)
  6. Add to bibliography

Failure handling: When verification fails, mark as [CITATION NEEDED] and clearly notify the user.

Integration: The principles of this skill are integrated into the ml-paper-writing skill for automatic verification.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する