本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

daily-paper-generator

Use when the user asks to "generate daily paper", "search arXiv for EEG papers", "find EEG decoding papers", "review brain-computer interface papers", or wants to create paper summaries for EEG/brain decoding/speech decoding research. This skill automates searching arXiv for recent papers on EEG decoding, EEG speech decoding, or brain foundation models, reviewing paper quality, and generating structured Chinese/English summaries.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md8.9 KB
  • example/daily paper example.md6.1 KB
  • references/keywords.md1.9 KB
  • references/quality-criteria.md4.0 KB
  • references/writing-style.md4.6 KB
  • scripts/arxiv_search.py4.6 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Daily Paper Generator

Overview

Automate the workflow of discovering, reviewing, and summarizing recent research papers on arXiv related to EEG decoding, brain-computer interfaces, and neural foundation models.

Core workflow:

  1. Search arXiv for recent papers (within 3 months) using Chrome browser
  2. Retrieve paper metadata from arXiv pages
  3. Evaluate paper quality using structured criteria
  4. Select top 3 papers
  5. Generate structured summaries with Chinese and English reviews
  6. Save results as Markdown files in daily paper/ directory

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • User asks to "generate daily paper" or "find recent EEG papers"
  • User wants to discover research on EEG decoding, speech decoding from EEG, or brain foundation models
  • User needs paper reviews with both Chinese and English summaries
  • User wants to track recent arXiv publications in neuro/AI intersection

Output Format

Each paper summary follows this structure (see example/daily paper example.md for complete example):

1. Header Section

# Paper Title

## 作者及单位
Author list
Institution

## arXiv 链接
https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID

**发表日期**: YYYY-MM-DD
**arXiv ID**: XXXX.XXXXX
**分类**: cs.LG, q-bio.NC, eess.SP

2. Review Sections

中文评语 (~300 words):

  • Background (1-2 sentences): Research context and importance
  • Challenges (2-3 sentences): Problems with existing methods
  • Contribution (1-2 sentences): Core contribution of this work
  • Method (2-3 sentences): Key technical details
  • Results (2-3 sentences): Main findings and metrics
  • Analysis & Limitations (1-2 sentences): Significance and limitations

English Review (fluent academic English):

  • Concise summary following the same structure as Chinese review
  • Use natural academic prose (avoid AI-like patterns)
  • Apply scientific writing best practices

3. Main Figure Section

## 主图
[预留论文主图位置]

4. Metadata Table

## 论文元数据

| 项目 | 内容 |
|------|------|
| **标题** | Paper Title |
| **第一作者** | First Author Name |
| **作者列表** | Full author list |
| **第一作者单位** | Institution |
| **发表日期** | YYYY-MM-DD |
| **arXiv 链接** | https://arxiv.org/abs/ID |
| **PDF 链接** | https://arxiv.org/pdf/ID |
| **分类** | cs.LG, q-bio.NC, eess.SP |

5. Integrated Format (for publishing)

## 整合格式

Daily Paper MMDD

Paper Title

https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID

[Chinese Review]

[English Review]

6. Appendix

## 附录

**github连接:** [Available/Not Available]

**补充说明**

[Key insights, impact points]

**Sources:**
- [arXiv Abstract](URL)
- [arXiv HTML](URL)
- [Paperverse Review](URL) (if available)

Quick Reference

TaskMethod
Search arXivUse Chrome MCP tools (chrome-mcp-helper)
Get paper detailsNavigate to arXiv pages and extract metadata
Evaluate qualityUse criteria in references/quality-criteria.md
Write Chinese reviewFollow style in references/writing-style.md
Write English reviewApply scientific-writing skill best practices
Create outputUse template in example/daily paper example.md

Workflow

Step 1: Search arXiv Using Chrome

Search keywords (see references/keywords.md for full list):

  • EEG decoding: EEG decoding, brain decoding, neural decoding
  • Speech decoding: speech decoding from EEG, EEG speech reconstruction
  • Foundation models: EEG foundation model, large EEG model, brain foundation model

Method: Use Chrome browser with arXiv search

  1. Navigate to arXiv search using Chrome MCP tools:

    • URL: https://arxiv.org/search/
    • Add search parameters: ?searchtype=all&query=KEYWORDS&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first
  2. Search URL pattern:

    https://arxiv.org/search/?searchtype=all&query=EEG+decoding&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first
    https://arxiv.org/search/?searchtype=all&query=EEG+foundation+model&abstracts=show&order=-announced_date_first
    
  3. Time filtering: Use date filters or sort by announced_date_first to get recent papers

  4. Extract paper information from search results:

    • Paper title
    • Authors
    • arXiv ID
    • Abstract preview
    • Publication date

Step 2: Retrieve Paper Details

For each candidate paper, navigate to its arXiv abs page and extract:

URL pattern: https://arxiv.org/abs/ARXIV_ID

Extract from page:

  • Title (from <h1> tag)
  • Authors (from .authors element)
  • Abstract (from blockquote.abstract)
  • Submission date (from .dateline)
  • arXiv ID (from URL or page)
  • Categories (from .subjects)
  • Comments (if present)
  • First author institution (if available in comments or author affiliations)

Step 3: Evaluate Paper Quality

Review each paper using the 5-dimension criteria in references/quality-criteria.md:

DimensionWeightKey Points
Innovation30%Novelty of contribution
Method Completeness25%Clarity and reproducibility
Experimental Thoroughness25%Validation depth
Writing Quality10%Clarity of expression
Relevance & Impact10%Domain importance

Scoring: Rate each dimension 1-5, calculate weighted sum.

Process:

  1. Screen by title/abstract for relevance
  2. Navigate to full paper page for detailed review
  3. Score each dimension
  4. Rank by total score
  5. Select top 3

Step 4: Generate Paper Summaries

For each selected paper, create a summary following the structure in example/daily paper example.md:

Required sections:

  1. Title (H1 heading)
  2. 作者及单位 (Authors and Institution)
  3. arXiv 链接 (with metadata: date, ID, categories)
  4. 中文评语 (Chinese review, ~300 words)
  5. English Review (fluent academic English)
  6. 主图 (placeholder for main figure)
  7. 论文元数据 (metadata table)
  8. 整合格式 (integrated format for publishing)
  9. 附录 (appendix with github link,补充说明, sources)

Writing Chinese review (see references/writing-style.md):

  • Background: 研究背景和重要性
  • Challenges: 现有方法的不足
  • Contribution: 本工作的核心贡献
  • Method: 关键技术细节
  • Results: 主要发现和指标
  • Analysis & Limitations: 意义和局限性

Writing English review:

  • Apply scientific-writing skill best practices
  • Use anti-AI writing principles (natural, varied sentence structure)
  • Keep concise and direct
  • Avoid formulaic transitions ("furthermore", "moreover", "additionally")

Step 5: Save Output

Create Markdown files in the daily paper/ directory:

daily paper/
├── 2025-01-26-1430-paper-1.md
├── 2025-01-26-1430-paper-2.md
└── 2025-01-26-1430-paper-3.md

Filename format: YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM-paper-N.md

Important: 使用时间戳(精确到分钟)避免覆盖之前生成的文件。

Example Output

See example/daily paper example.md for a complete example of the DeeperBrain paper summary with all sections properly formatted.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/keywords.md - Complete search keyword list and arXiv URL patterns
  • references/quality-criteria.md - Detailed 5-dimension evaluation criteria with scoring rubrics
  • references/writing-style.md - Chinese review structure, templates, and example analysis

Example Files

  • example/daily paper example.md - Complete output example with all sections
  • scripts/arxiv_search.py - Legacy Python script (deprecated, use Chrome instead)

Chrome MCP Tools

Use Chrome MCP tools for browser automation:

  • Navigation: Open arXiv search and paper pages
  • Screenshot: Capture pages for analysis
  • Tabs: Manage multiple arXiv pages
  • Content extraction: Parse paper metadata from HTML

Important Notes

  1. Time range: Search focuses on papers from the last 3 months (check submission dates)
  2. Link format: Use arXiv abs page links (https://arxiv.org/abs/ID), not direct PDF links
  3. Review length: Chinese reviews should be approximately 300 words
  4. Quality focus: Prioritize content quality (innovation, method, experiments) over quantitative metrics
  5. Bilingual output: Both Chinese and English reviews are required for each paper
  6. Chrome required: This workflow uses Chrome browser automation via MCP tools
  7. Complete format: Ensure all 9 sections are included in each summary
  8. Consistent naming: Use Daily Paper MMDD format in integrated section

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する