本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

Getting Started with Research Superpowers

Introduction to literature search & review skills - systematic paper finding, screening, extraction, and citation traversal

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

<!-- ╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗ ║ 本文件为开源 Skill 原始文档,收录仅供学习与研究参考 ║ ║ CoPaper.AI 收集整理 | https://copaper.ai ║ ╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝ 来源仓库: https://github.com/kthorn/research-superpower 项目名称: research-superpower 开源协议: MIT License 收录日期: 2026-04-02 声明: 本文件版权归原作者所有。此处收录旨在为社会科学实证研究者 提供 AI Agent Skills 的集中参考。如有侵权,请联系删除。 -->

Getting Started with Research Superpowers

Research Superpowers gives Claude Code systematic workflows for literature searching and review.

Focus: Finding, screening, and extracting data from published papers. NOT for analyzing experimental data or designing experiments.

What You Can Do

Use these skills for systematic literature reviews:

  • Search literature - PubMed and Semantic Scholar integration
  • Build screening rubrics - Define and test relevance criteria collaboratively
  • Screen papers - Two-stage screening (abstract → deep dive) with scoring
  • Extract data - Find specific methods, results, measurements from papers
  • Traverse citations - Smart backward/forward citation following
  • Large-scale screening - Parallel subagent processing for 50+ papers
  • Track findings - Organized research sessions with summaries, PDFs, and deduplication

Available Skills

Literature Search & Review Skills (skills/research/)

  • answering-research-questions - Main orchestration workflow (search → screen → extract → synthesize)
  • building-screening-rubrics - Collaborative rubric design with test-driven refinement
  • searching-literature - PubMed search with keyword optimization
  • evaluating-paper-relevance - Two-stage screening (abstract → deep dive)
  • subagent-driven-review - Parallel screening for large searches (50+ papers)
  • checking-chembl - Check if medicinal chemistry papers have curated SAR data in ChEMBL
  • traversing-citations - Semantic Scholar citation network traversal
  • finding-open-access-papers - Unpaywall API to find free versions of paywalled papers
  • cleaning-up-research-sessions - Safe cleanup of intermediate files after research complete

Basic Workflow

When user asks a literature search question:

  1. Read answering-research-questions skill - Main orchestration
  2. Announce: "I'm using the Answering Research Questions skill"
  3. Parse query - Extract keywords, data types, constraints
  4. Create research folder - Propose name, initialize tracking
  5. Optional: Build rubric - For large searches (50+ papers), use building-screening-rubrics skill
  6. Search → Screen → Extract → Traverse - Follow the workflow
  7. Check in regularly - Every 10 papers, checkpoint every 50

Research Session Folders

Each query creates a folder in research-sessions/:

research-sessions/YYYY-MM-DD-query-description/
├── SUMMARY.md              # Main findings
├── papers-reviewed.json    # Deduplication tracking (DOI → status)
├── papers/                 # Downloaded PDFs and supplementary data
└── citations/              # Citation graph tracking

Core Principles

For systematic literature review:

  • Precision over breadth - Find papers with specific data you need, not just topical matches
  • Test-driven screening - Build and validate rubrics before bulk processing
  • Smart citation following - Only traverse relevant citations to avoid exponential explosion
  • Deduplicate aggressively - Track ALL reviewed papers by DOI (even non-relevant)
  • Cache abstracts - Save for re-screening when rubrics change
  • Report progress - Update user every 10 papers as work proceeds
  • Checkpoint frequently - Ask to continue or stop every 50 papers
  • Reproducible - Save rubrics, queries, and methodology with research sessions

API Information

PubMed E-utilities (no key required):

  • Search: https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esearch.fcgi
  • Details: https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/esummary.fcgi
  • Full text: https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils/efetch.fcgi

Semantic Scholar (free tier works, optional key for higher limits):

  • Paper: https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/DOI:{doi}
  • References: https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{id}/references
  • Citations: https://api.semanticscholar.org/graph/v1/paper/{id}/citations

Finding Skills

Use the find-skills script to search for relevant skills:

# From project directory
./scripts/find-skills              # List all skills
./scripts/find-skills literature   # Search for "literature"
./scripts/find-skills 'cite|ref'   # Regex search

Remember

  • Always start by reading the relevant research skill
  • Announce skill usage when you begin
  • Track everything in the research folder
  • Check in with user regularly during long searches
  • Deduplicate using papers-reviewed.json (DOI as key)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6032026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6032026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6032026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6032026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6032026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6032026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する