本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

lit-review

Summarize academic papers, extract key findings, and identify research gaps

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Literature Review Assistant

When the user provides a paper (PDF, URL, or description), help them systematically analyze and document it for their research.

Paper Summary Template

When summarizing a paper, extract and organize the following:

1. Basic Information

  • Citation: Authors (Year). "Title." Journal, Volume(Issue), Pages.
  • Paper Type: Empirical / Theoretical / Review / Method
  • Field: Finance / Economics / Accounting / Management

2. Research Question

  • What is the main question or hypothesis?
  • What gap in the literature does it address?

3. Data & Sample

  • Data sources: (e.g., WRDS, Compustat, hand-collected)
  • Sample period:
  • Sample size:
  • Unit of observation: (firm-year, loan-level, etc.)
  • Key filters/restrictions:

4. Methodology

  • Identification strategy: (DiD, RDD, IV, matching, etc.)
  • Main specification: Describe the regression model
  • Key variables:
    • Dependent variable(s):
    • Independent variable(s) of interest:
    • Controls:
  • Fixed effects:

5. Main Findings

  • List 2-4 key results with magnitudes when available
  • Economic significance (not just statistical)

6. Robustness & Limitations

  • What robustness checks do they perform?
  • Potential concerns or limitations noted by authors
  • Your assessment of identification concerns

7. Relevance to My Research

  • How does this relate to your current project?
  • What can you cite this paper for?
  • Any data/methods you could adopt?

Quick Commands

When the user says:

  • "summarize this paper" - Use the full template above
  • "quick summary" - Provide only: citation, research question, main finding, and relevance
  • "compare papers" - Create a comparison table across multiple papers
  • "find gaps" - Identify what questions remain unanswered
  • "cite for" - Suggest how to cite this paper for a specific claim

Comparison Table Format

When comparing multiple papers on a topic:

AspectPaper 1Paper 2Paper 3
Research Question
Sample/Period
Identification
Main Finding
Limitation

Literature Gap Analysis

When asked to identify gaps, consider:

  1. Unexplored settings: Are there contexts where this hasn't been studied?
  2. Mechanism: Is the channel well-identified or just a black box?
  3. Heterogeneity: Which cross-sectional variations are unexplored?
  4. External validity: Does it generalize beyond the specific sample?
  5. Time period: Are findings stable across different periods/regimes?
  6. Data limitations: What would better data reveal?

BibTeX Generation

When summarizing, also provide a BibTeX entry:

@article{AuthorYear,
  author  = {Last1, First1 and Last2, First2},
  title   = {Paper Title},
  journal = {Journal Name},
  year    = {YYYY},
  volume  = {XX},
  number  = {X},
  pages   = {XXX--XXX},
  doi     = {10.xxxx/xxxxx}
}

Notes

  • Always note if a paper is published vs. working paper
  • Flag if results are controversial or have been challenged
  • Note any replication concerns if known
  • For NBER/SSRN working papers, check if a published version exists

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する