本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

literature-review-tools

Recommend AND run open-source AI tools, agents, Claude Code / Codex skills, and MCP servers for any stage of a literature review — searching, reading, extracting, synthesizing, screening, citation-checking, and paper writing. Use when the user asks "what tool should I use to..." OR "install/run/use <tool> to ..." for research/lit-review work: automating a survey or related-work section, PDF→Markdown extraction for LLMs (MinerU/marker/docling), PRISMA / systematic review (ASReview), citation-backed Q&A over PDFs (PaperQA2), wiring papers into Claude/Cursor via MCP (arxiv/paper-search/zotero servers), or chatting with a Zotero library. Ships a launcher (scripts/litrun.py) that installs each tool in an isolated venv and runs it. Curated catalog of 70+ vetted projects. 支持中英文(用于「文献综述工具选型」与「一键安装/运行」)。

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(6)

  • SKILL.md10.0 KB
  • recipes/recipes.json9.1 KB
  • recipes/workflows.json3.4 KB
  • reference/catalog.md12.7 KB
  • scripts/fetch_arxiv.py3.9 KB
  • scripts/litrun.py20.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Literature Review Tools — Select & Run

A curated, use-case-organized catalog of the strongest open-source AI tools for literature review — plus a launcher that actually installs and runs the top ones. Covers: end-to-end research agents, deep-research / auto-survey generators, autonomous "idea→paper" systems, citation-backed RAG over PDFs, PRISMA screening, MCP servers, Zotero/Obsidian integrations, PDF→structured extraction, citation graphs, and paper-writing / peer-review assistants.

Full source of truth (README, always current star counts): https://github.com/brycewang-stanford/lit-review-agent-tools

Two modes

  • Recommend — user asks "what should I use to …". Route with the tables below; cite the catalog for details.
  • Run — user asks to install / run / use a specific tool ("turn this PDF into Markdown with MinerU", "ask PaperQA2 about these papers", "set up the arXiv MCP server"). Drive scripts/litrun.py via Bash — do not hand the user raw pip commands to copy.

Run mode — how to drive scripts/litrun.py

The launcher installs each supported tool into its own venv under ~/.lit-review-tools/ (uses uv if present, else python -m venv) and reads API keys from one shared ~/.lit-review-tools/.env. Machine-readable recipes: recipes/recipes.json.

Typical flow when the user wants to use a tool:

  1. python3 scripts/litrun.py doctor — check toolchain + which API keys are already set.
  2. python3 scripts/litrun.py info <id> — confirm what the tool needs (entry, required env).
  3. If a required key is missing, ask the user for it, then litrun.py env --set KEY=VALUE (never echo the value back in full).
  4. python3 scripts/litrun.py run <id> -- <tool args> — installs on first use, then runs. For PDF tools pass the real file path; e.g. run mineru -- -p paper.pdf -o ./out -b pipeline.
  5. For MCP servers, don't "run" them — litrun.py mcp <id> prints the client config block to register in Claude Code / Cursor.

Commands: list [--category C] [--kind K] · info <id> · doctor · env [--set K=V] · install <id> · run <id> -- <args> · mcp <id> [--storage PATH] [--client claude|cursor] · ui <id>.

Runnable ids by kind:

  • python-cli (auto install+run): mineru, marker, docling (PDF→Markdown) · paper-qa (cited Q&A) · asreview (PRISMA screening UI)
  • python-script (bundled, auto install+run): arxiv-fetch (search arXiv & download PDFs, no key)
  • python-lib (install + run example): gpt-researcher, storm (deep research; need API keys) · scholarly, pyalex (API clients)
  • mcp-server (install + mcp config): arxiv-mcp-server, paper-search-mcp, zotero-mcp

For gpt-researcher and storm, litrun.py ui <id> clones the repo and launches the full web UI (GPT Researcher → FastAPI at :8000; STORM → Streamlit at :8501). These are long-running servers — launch them with a background Bash call and tell the user the URL. gpt-researcher's UI needs OPENAI_API_KEY + TAVILY_API_KEY set first (litrun writes them into the repo's .env); STORM takes its keys in the app sidebar.

Chained pipelines

For multi-tool tasks, prefer a named workflow over hand-wiring steps: litrun.py workflow list then litrun.py workflow run <id> [--input PATH] [--query "..."] [--question "..."] [--max N]. Built-ins:

  • pdf-to-markdown — a PDF/folder → clean Markdown (MinerU)
  • pdf-corpus-qa — a folder of PDFs → citation-backed answer (PaperQA2)
  • pdf-md-then-qa — convert to Markdown and answer a question over the corpus
  • topic-to-pdfs — arXiv query → download top-N PDFs (arxiv-fetch, no key)
  • topic-to-review — arXiv query → download PDFs → citation-backed answer (PaperQA2). The end-to-end "retrieve then review" pipeline; no MCP client needed. Needs OPENAI_API_KEY for the QA step.

Add --dry-run first to show the exact resolved step commands without executing — good for confirming paths with the user before a heavy run. Workflows fail fast if a required API key is missing.

Guardrails: installs and downloads happen under the user's home and hit the network — for a heavy first install (marker/docling pull in PyTorch) say so before running. Never fabricate API keys. If a run fails, show the real error rather than claiming success. Paths in this file (scripts/…, recipes/…) are relative to this skill's directory.

Recommend mode — how to route

  1. Identify which stage of the lit-review workflow the user is on (search → read → extract → synthesize → screen → cite-check → write/review).
  2. Match it to a category below and recommend the ⭐ editor's pick first, then 1–2 alternatives.
  3. For anything beyond the top pick — full star counts, every project in a category, or a category not summarized here — read reference/catalog.md. Do not guess project names or URLs; pull them from the catalog.
  4. Give a one-line "why this one" tied to the user's constraint (Claude Code vs. standalone, open vs. commercial, privacy/local, medical, etc.). If the pick is a runnable id above, offer to install/run it.

⚡ 30-second picker

Use Claude Code, want end-to-end research→paper ──────────▶ academic-research-skills ⭐
Want AI to research a topic → cited report ───────────────▶ GPT Researcher / STORM
Want fully autonomous "idea → submittable paper" ────────▶ AI-Scientist-v2 / AutoResearchClaw
Citation-backed Q&A over a pile of PDFs ──────────────────▶ PaperQA2
Rigorous PRISMA review (thousands of abstracts) ─────────▶ ASReview / prismAId
Clean Markdown from PDFs to feed an LLM ─────────────────▶ MinerU / Docling / marker
Lit capabilities inside Claude / Cursor (MCP) ───────────▶ paper-search-mcp / zotero-mcp
Chat with your library inside Zotero ────────────────────▶ zotero-gpt / PapersGPT
Pre-submission AI peer review ───────────────────────────▶ open_reviewer / ai-peer-review

Categories (top pick per category)

CategoryEditor's pick ⭐When
All-in-one research agents & skillsacademic-research-skillsClaude Code user wanting research→write→review→revise, with integrity/citation gates
Deep research & auto-surveySTORM / gpt-researcherTopic → cited survey / report / related-work
Autonomous science (idea→paper)AI-Scientist(-v2) / AutoResearchClawFully automated discovery: lit + hypotheses + experiments + writing
Literature Q&A / RAGpaper-qa (PaperQA2)Citation-backed answers over a PDF corpus
Systematic review & screeningASReviewActive-learning screening of thousands of abstracts (PRISMA)
MCP serverszotero-mcp / arxiv-mcp-serverWire papers into Claude / Cursor / Cline
Zotero / Obsidian integrationzotero-gptChat with your library inside your reference manager
PDF → structured extractionMinerU / docling / markerTurn PDFs into clean Markdown/JSON for LLMs
Citation graphs & API clientsscholarly / pyalexCitation-network analysis; scripting academic DBs
Writing & peer-review assistantsopen_reviewer / ai-peer-reviewDraft, polish, and pre-submission review
Awesome listsAwesome-Auto-Research-ToolsBrowse the whole landscape

Decision table (map need → recommendation)

User's needRecommend
Claude Code, end-to-end research→paperacademic-research-skills (most complete, #1 in space)
Generic "research this topic for me" agentGPT Researcher / STORM
Wiki/survey-style long-form with citationsSTORM / Co-STORM
Fully autonomous "idea → submittable paper"AI-Scientist-v2 / AutoResearchClaw
Cited Q&A over many PDFsPaperQA / PaperQA2
Rigorous PRISMA systematic reviewASReview or prismAId
PDF → clean Markdown for an LLMMinerU / Docling / marker
Lit capabilities in an MCP clientpaper-search-mcp / zotero-mcp
Chat with library inside Zoterozotero-gpt / PapersGPT
AI pre-review before submissionopen_reviewer / ai-peer-review
Just want to browse the landscapeThe Awesome lists section

Notes & caveats

  • Open-source is prioritized. Commercial/closed tools (Elicit, Consensus, Scite, SciSpace, Research Rabbit, Connected Papers) are listed for reference only — see the catalog's commercial section.
  • Star counts drift. The catalog's numbers are periodic GitHub-API snapshots — treat as rough popularity signals, not exact. For live numbers, point the user at the repo.
  • Match the constraint, not just the task. Privacy/local → local-deep-research; medical → medsci-skills / paperai; Codex instead of Claude → academic-research-skills-codex.

Full catalog with every project, star count, and one-line description: reference/catalog.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する