本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

markdown-unwrap

Unwraps hard-wrapped markdown files so that each sentence ends with a newline instead of mid-sentence line breaks. Joins continuation lines within a paragraph into single lines, then re-breaks at sentence boundaries (period, question mark, exclamation point). Preserves blank lines, headings, fenced code blocks, block quotes, and list items. Use when asked to unwrap text, fix line breaks, reflow sentences, or clean up hard-wrapped markdown or .qmd files.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Markdown Unwrap

Reflow a markdown (or .qmd) file so that each sentence occupies its own line. This is the inverse of hard-wrapping: mid-sentence newlines are removed and the text is re-broken only at sentence endings.

Input Arguments

PositionRequiredDescription
1YesPath to the input .md or .qmd file
2NoOutput path. Defaults to overwriting the input file in-place

Example invocations:

/markdown-unwrap paper/paper.qmd
/markdown-unwrap README.md README-unwrapped.md

Algorithm

Process the file line-by-line, maintaining a current paragraph buffer:

  1. Pass-through lines — output immediately, do not buffer:

    • Blank lines (flush the buffer first, then emit the blank line)
    • ATX headings (#, ##, …)
    • Fenced code block delimiters (``` or ~~~); toggle a in-code-block flag and pass all lines through until the closing fence
    • Block-quote lines starting with >
    • List item lines starting with -, *, +, or a digit followed by ./)
    • YAML front-matter delimiters --- / ... (pass the entire front-matter block through unchanged)
  2. Buffering — for all other lines, append the line's text to the current buffer (joining with a single space, trimming leading/trailing whitespace from each line).

  3. Flushing — when a pass-through line (or end-of-file) is encountered, flush the buffer:

    • Split the accumulated text into sentences at (?<=[.!?])\s+ — i.e., after a sentence-ending punctuation mark followed by whitespace.
    • Emit each sentence on its own line.
    • Clear the buffer.
  4. Write the result to the output path (or overwrite the input if no output path was given).

What Is Preserved

  • Blank lines (paragraph separators)
  • Fenced code blocks (contents unchanged)
  • YAML front matter
  • Headings, list items, and block quotes (each kept on its own line)
  • All text content — only whitespace between words is affected

What Changes

  • Mid-sentence hard-wrap newlines are removed
  • Each sentence ends with exactly one newline
  • Trailing spaces within paragraphs are removed

Implementation Notes

Implement the algorithm directly in your response — read the file, process it line-by-line following the rules above, and write the result. No external script is needed.

The sentence-split heuristic: a period followed by whitespace and an uppercase letter is a sentence boundary unless the word immediately before the period is a known abbreviation. Maintain a blocklist of common abbreviations that should never trigger a split:

  • Titles: Mr, Mrs, Ms, Dr, Prof, Sr, Jr, Rev, Gov
  • Latin: e.g, i.e, et al, vs, etc
  • Academic: Fig, Eq, Sec, Ch, Vol, No, pp

When the token before the period matches one of these (case-insensitively), do not split. For ? and ! there is no abbreviation concern — always split.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する