本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

newproject

Scaffold a new research project with standard directory structure, CLAUDE.md template, and documented README. Use this at the start of every new project to ensure consistent organization.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md3.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

New Project Scaffold

Create a new research project folder with Scott's standard structure. This skill is invoked at the start of every project.

What Gets Created

[project-name]/
├── CLAUDE.md              # Permanent research rules (copied from template)
├── README.md              # Project-specific overview (auto-generated)
├── code/
│   ├── R/
│   ├── python/
│   └── stata/
├── data/
│   ├── raw/               # Original source data (never modify)
│   └── clean/             # Cleaned/merged datasets
├── output/
│   ├── tables/
│   └── figures/
├── documents/             # Outside PDFs, papers (use /split-pdf on these)
├── decks/                 # Beamer presentations (rhetoric of decks)
├── notes/                 # Scratch notes, random ideas, misc
└── progress_logs/         # Session continuity across Claude conversations

Execution

  1. Get the project name from the argument. If none provided, ask.

    • Convert spaces to hyphens, lowercase
  2. Determine location — default is current working directory. Confirm if unclear.

  3. Create all directories:

    mkdir -p [project-name]/{code/{R,stata,python},data/{raw,clean},output/{figures,tables},documents,decks,notes,progress_logs}
    
  4. Copy CLAUDE.md from ~/mixtapetools/claude/CLAUDE.md:

    • Replace [Your Name] with Scott
    • Update project name in the overview section
  5. Generate README.md with:

    • Project title
    • Visual directory tree in a fenced code block (monospace)
    • Explanation of each folder's purpose
    • Note that CLAUDE.md is copied from a permanent template and edited per-project
    • Note that README.md is for project-specific documentation
    • Note that progress_logs/ maintains continuity across Claude sessions
    • Placeholder sections: Overview, Collaborators, Status, Key Files

    The README must include this tree block:

    ```
    [project-name]/
    ├── CLAUDE.md              # Research rules & estimation philosophy (permanent)
    ├── README.md              # This file — project-specific notes
    ├── code/
    │   ├── R/                 # R scripts
    │   ├── python/            # Python scripts
    │   └── stata/             # Stata do-files
    ├── data/
    │   ├── raw/               # Original source data (never modify these)
    │   └── clean/             # Cleaned and merged datasets
    ├── output/
    │   ├── tables/            # Generated tables (LaTeX, CSV)
    │   └── figures/           # Generated figures (PDF, PNG)
    ├── documents/             # Outside papers and PDFs (split with /split-pdf)
    ├── decks/                 # Beamer presentations (rhetoric of decks philosophy)
    ├── notes/                 # Scratch notes, ideas, miscellaneous
    └── progress_logs/         # Session logs for continuity across Claude conversations
    ```
    
  6. Create initial progress log at progress_logs/YYYY-MM-DD_setup.md:

    • Record the creation date
    • List next steps as a checklist
  7. Report success — show structure with ls, remind user to update CLAUDE.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する