本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

orchestrator

Unified Agent Teams orchestrator for Diverga v12.0.0. Manages Agent Teams creation, VS Arena debate, and subagent dispatch. Single entry point for all parallel/debate workflows. Replaces research-orchestrator and vs-arena skills. Triggers: orchestrator, agent team, create team, parallel agents, debate, competing, collaborate, VS Arena

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Diverga Orchestrator

Role

Execution layer (HOW). Receives agent IDs, decides execution strategy, manages lifecycle.

Does NOT handle:

  • Paradigm detection (research-coordinator)
  • Checkpoint enforcement (research-coordinator)
  • Agent selection logic (research-coordinator)

No circular dependency: coordinator calls orchestrator, never reverse. Orchestrator receives agent IDs and executes; it does not call back into the coordinator.


Invocation

  1. Explicit: /diverga:orchestrator
  2. Natural language: "create team", "debate", "parallel agents", "run VS Arena", "compare methods", "competing hypotheses"
  3. Auto: research-coordinator delegates when parallel or debate execution is needed

Prerequisite Handling

Orchestrator does NOT enforce research checkpoints. It trusts the caller (coordinator or user) to have resolved prerequisites.

  • When called by coordinator: all prerequisites already resolved. Orchestrator receives agent IDs + context + execution mode.
  • When called directly by user: if .research/ context exists, read it; otherwise proceed without checkpoint gating.
  • Orchestrator's own checkpoint: only token cost confirmation before team creation.

Decision Logic

Request received
  |
  v
Check config.agent_teams.enabled
  |
  +-- false --> Always use subagents (Task with run_in_background)
  |
  +-- true --> Check CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS env var
       |
       +-- not set --> Subagent fallback + warn user
       |
       +-- set --> Evaluate scenario
            |
            +-- Inter-agent debate needed? --> Agent Teams
            |     (VS Arena, cross-method comparison, competing hypotheses)
            |
            +-- Parallel independent work? --> Agent Teams
            |     (multi-DB fetch, parallel review, concurrent analysis)
            |
            +-- Sequential pipeline? --> Subagents
            |     (G5->G6->F5 humanize, single agent tasks)
            |
            +-- Simple single agent? --> Direct Task dispatch

Agent Teams Mode

When config.agent_teams.enabled = true AND CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 is set.

Team Lifecycle

  1. Evaluate scenario -- determine if Teams adds value over subagents
  2. Create team -- natural language prompt to Claude Code (conversational team creation, NOT raw TeamCreate API call)
  3. Spawn teammates -- each teammate receives an agent-specific prompt with research context
  4. Monitor progress -- track teammate status
  5. Collect results -- gather outputs from all teammates
  6. Present at checkpoint -- deliver results for user review
  7. Cleanup -- delete team after user selection or task completion

VS Arena Protocol (7 Stages)

Stage 1: Context Collection

Gather research context from diverga_project_status or user input:

  • research_question (from CP_RESEARCH_DIRECTION or user)
  • paradigm (from CP_PARADIGM_SELECTION or user)
  • research_field (e.g., Education, Psychology, HRD)
  • target_journal (if available)
  • key_variables (if available)

Stage 2: Persona Selection

Select 3 of 5 personas (V1-V5) based on paradigm:

RuleAlways include 1 persona differing from CP_PARADIGM_SELECTION
ParadigmSelection
QuantitativeV1 + V4 + one of V2/V3/V5
QualitativeV4 + V1 + one of V2/V3/V5
MixedV3 + two of V1/V2/V4/V5
No paradigm setV1 + V3 + V4 (maximum paradigmatic spread)

All VS Arena personas run on opus.

Stage 3: Team Creation

Create the team and spawn 3 persona teammates:

TeamCreate("vs-arena-{topic}")
Spawn teammate for each selected persona with prompt:
  - Research context (question, field, paradigm, variables, journal)
  - Persona definition reference (agents/v{N}.md)
  - Persona constraints reference (config/personas.json cannotRecommend)
  - Instruction: provide exactly ONE methodology recommendation

Stage 4: Independent Research

Each persona investigates the research question independently. No inter-agent communication during this stage.

Stage 5: Cross-Critique

Teammates message each other directly via team mailbox (SendMessage):

  • Each persona receives the other two recommendations
  • Each writes a 2-3 sentence critique from their epistemological perspective
  • Personas may refine their recommendations based on feedback

Stage 6: Synthesis + Checkpoint

Lead collects all positions and presents at CP_METHODOLOGY_APPROVAL:

## VS Arena: Methodology Recommendations

### Option A: [Persona] Recommendation
Methodology: [name]
T-Score: [score]
Rationale: [brief]
Cross-critique from other personas: [summaries]

### Option B: ...
### Option C: ...

Which methodology would you like to proceed with? (A/B/C)

WAIT for user selection. Record decision.

Stage 7: Cleanup

TeamDelete after user makes selection.

Scenario Templates

ScenarioTeam NameTeammatesWhen
VS Arenavs-arena-{topic}3 of V1-V5CP_METHODOLOGY_APPROVAL or explicit request
Systematic Reviewsr-pipeline-{topic}I1 x3 (per DB)I0 multi-DB fetch
Cross-Methodmethod-compare-{topic}C1+C2+C3Competing design recommendations
Parallel Reviewreview-{topic}2-5 agentsQuality review from multiple angles
Custom{user-specified}User-specifiedExplicit orchestrator call

Custom Teams

Users can request custom teams via natural language:

User: "/diverga:orchestrator create a team with C1 and C2 to compare
       quantitative designs for my RCT study"

Orchestrator parses:
  - agents: [C1, C2]
  - purpose: competing design recommendations
  - team_name: "design-compare-rct"
  - teammate_count: 2
User: "Have 3 agents review my methodology section from different angles"

Orchestrator infers:
  - agents: [X1 (ethics), B2 (quality), G2 (publication readiness)]
  - purpose: parallel review
  - team_name: "review-methodology"
  - teammate_count: 3

Maximum teammates: 5 (per Claude Code best practices). If user requests more, suggest splitting into phases.


Subagent Mode (Fallback)

When teams are disabled or unavailable, all workflows fall back to subagent dispatch.

Same VS Arena stages, but:

  • Stage 3: Task(subagent_type="diverga:v{N}", model="opus", run_in_background=true) instead of team creation
  • Stage 5: SKIP cross-critique -- subagents cannot message each other. Orchestrator synthesizes comparison instead: reads all 3 outputs, identifies overlaps and contradictions, presents unified comparison.
  • Stage 6: Lead presents orchestrator-synthesized comparison at checkpoint

Cross-critique is permanently unavailable in subagent mode. This is a known limitation, not a bug. The orchestrator compensates with its own synthesis.


Model Routing

All agents route to their designated model tier. Source of truth: config/agents.json.

CategoryAgentDisplay NameTierModel
A: FoundationA1Research Question RefinerHIGHopus
A2Theory & Critique ArchitectHIGHopus
A5Paradigm AdvisorHIGHopus
B: EvidenceB1Literature ScoutMEDIUMsonnet
B2Quality AppraiserMEDIUMsonnet
C: DesignC1Quantitative Design & SamplingHIGHopus
C2Qualitative Design (Ethnography/AR)HIGHopus
C3Mixed Methods DesignHIGHopus
C5Meta-Analysis MasterHIGHopus
D: CollectionD2Data Collection SpecialistMEDIUMsonnet
D4Instrument DeveloperHIGHopus
E: AnalysisE1Quantitative Analysis & Code GenHIGHopus
E2Qualitative CodingHIGHopus
E3Mixed Methods IntegrationHIGHopus
F: QualityF5Humanization VerifierMEDIUMsonnet
G: PublicationG1Journal MatcherMEDIUMsonnet
G2Publication SpecialistMEDIUMsonnet
G5Academic Style AuditorMEDIUMsonnet
G6Academic Style HumanizerHIGHopus
I: Systematic ReviewI0SR Pipeline OrchestratorHIGHopus
I1Paper RetrievalMEDIUMsonnet
I2Screening AssistantMEDIUMsonnet
I3RAG BuilderLOWhaiku
X: Cross-CuttingX1Research GuardianHIGHopus

V1-V5 personas are not listed here -- they are always invoked through VS Arena at opus tier.

Always pass model parameter explicitly when dispatching:

# HIGH tier
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="opus", ...)
# MEDIUM tier
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="sonnet", ...)
# LOW tier
Task(subagent_type="general-purpose", model="haiku", ...)

Token Cost Awareness

Before creating a team, prompt the user:

"Agent Teams will spawn N independent sessions. Proceed?
 [Y] Yes  /  [S] Subagents instead  /  [N] Cancel"

Skip this prompt if the user explicitly requested teams.


Removed Modes

Autonomous modes (Sisyphus, OMC, ralph, ultrawork, ecomode) removed in v6.0. See CHANGELOG.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6062026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6062026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6062026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6062026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6062026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6062026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する