Transforms workflow to use Manus-style persistent markdown files for planning, progress tracking, and knowledge storage. Use when starting complex tasks, multi-step projects, research tasks, or when the user mentions planning, organizing work, tracking progress, or wants structured output.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Work like Manus: Use persistent markdown files as your "working memory on disk."
Before ANY complex task:
task_plan.md in the working directoryFor every non-trivial task, create THREE files:
| File | Purpose | When to Update |
|---|---|---|
task_plan.md | Track phases and progress | After each phase |
notes.md | Store findings and research | During research |
[deliverable].md | Final output | At completion |
Loop 1: Create task_plan.md with goal and phases
Loop 2: Research → save to notes.md → update task_plan.md
Loop 3: Read notes.md → create deliverable → update task_plan.md
Loop 4: Deliver final output
Before each major action:
Read task_plan.md # Refresh goals in attention window
After each phase:
Edit task_plan.md # Mark [x], update status
When storing information:
Write notes.md # Don't stuff context, store in file
Create this file FIRST for any complex task:
# Task Plan: [Brief Description]
## Goal
[One sentence describing the end state]
## Phases
- [ ] Phase 1: Plan and setup
- [ ] Phase 2: Research/gather information
- [ ] Phase 3: Execute/build
- [ ] Phase 4: Review and deliver
## Key Questions
1. [Question to answer]
2. [Question to answer]
## Decisions Made
- [Decision]: [Rationale]
## Errors Encountered
- [Error]: [Resolution]
## Status
**Currently in Phase X** - [What I'm doing now]
For research and findings:
# Notes: [Topic]
## Sources
### Source 1: [Name]
- URL: [link]
- Key points:
- [Finding]
- [Finding]
## Synthesized Findings
### [Category]
- [Finding]
- [Finding]
Never start a complex task without task_plan.md. This is non-negotiable.
Before any major decision, read the plan file. This keeps goals in your attention window.
After completing any phase, immediately update the plan file:
Large outputs go to files, not context. Keep only paths in working memory.
Every error goes in the "Errors Encountered" section. This builds knowledge for future tasks.
Use 3-file pattern for:
Skip for:
| Don't | Do Instead |
|---|---|
| Use TodoWrite for persistence | Create task_plan.md file |
| State goals once and forget | Re-read plan before each decision |
| Hide errors and retry | Log errors to plan file |
| Stuff everything in context | Store large content in files |
| Start executing immediately | Create plan file FIRST |
See reference.md for:
See examples.md for:
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。