本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

post-acceptance

This skill should be used when the user asks to "prepare conference presentation", "create presentation slides", "design poster", "make academic poster", "write promotion content", "create Twitter thread", or mentions post-acceptance conference preparation. Provides comprehensive workflow for presentation, poster, and promotion content creation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(7)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • examples/post-acceptance-plan.md204 B
  • references/deliverable-checklists.md344 B
  • references/design-guidelines.md2.4 KB
  • references/poster-templates/basic-poster-template.md496 B
  • references/presentation-templates/basic-template.md420 B
  • references/promotion-examples/twitter-example.md711 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Post-Acceptance Conference Preparation

A post-acceptance conference preparation workflow that helps researchers efficiently complete presentations, posters, and promotional content.

Core Features

1. Presentation Slide Creation

Guidance for creating conference presentation slides:

Time Control

  • 15-minute talk: 10-15 slides
  • 20-minute talk: 15-20 slides
  • 30-minute talk: 20-30 slides
  • Average 1-1.5 minutes per slide

Content Structure

  • Title slide (1)
  • Motivation/Problem (2-3)
  • Method overview (3-5)
  • Key results (3-5)
  • Conclusion (1-2)
  • Q&A/Thank you (1)

Visual Design Principles

  • One key message per slide
  • Use figures and diagrams over text
  • Consistent color scheme and fonts
  • Minimum font size: 24pt for body, 32pt for titles
  • High-contrast colors for readability

Presentation Tips

  • Practice timing with a stopwatch
  • Prepare backup slides for anticipated questions
  • Use animations sparingly and purposefully
  • Include slide numbers for Q&A reference

2. Academic Poster Design

Guidance for creating conference posters:

Standard Sizes

  • Portrait: 24x36 inches or A0 (841x1189mm)
  • Landscape: 36x24 inches or A0 landscape
  • Check conference requirements for specific size

Layout Structure

  • Title bar (top): Title, authors, affiliations, logos
  • Introduction (left): Problem statement, motivation
  • Method (center): Key approach, architecture diagram
  • Results (right): Main findings, tables, figures
  • Conclusion (bottom): Summary, future work, QR code

Design Guidelines

  • Readable from 4-6 feet distance
  • Title font: 72-96pt
  • Section headers: 36-48pt
  • Body text: 24-32pt
  • Use bullet points, not paragraphs
  • Include QR code linking to paper/code

3. Promotion Content Creation

Guidance for creating promotional content after paper acceptance:

Twitter/X Thread

  • Thread structure: Hook -> Problem -> Method -> Key Result -> Link
  • First tweet: Attention-grabbing summary with emoji
  • Include 1-2 key figures
  • End with paper link and relevant hashtags
  • Tag co-authors and relevant accounts

LinkedIn Post

  • Professional tone, 3-5 paragraphs
  • Highlight practical implications
  • Include key figure or diagram
  • Add relevant hashtags

Blog Post

  • 800-1500 words
  • Non-technical summary for broader audience
  • Include figures with explanations
  • Link to paper, code, and demo

When to Use

Use this skill in the following scenarios:

  • After paper acceptance - Prepare presentation materials for the conference
  • Poster session preparation - Design and create academic poster
  • Research promotion - Create social media and blog content
  • Conference talk preparation - Structure and practice presentation

Workflow

Presentation Workflow

Paper accepted -> Identify key messages -> Create slide outline -> Design slides -> Practice timing -> Prepare Q&A backup slides

Poster Workflow

Paper accepted -> Choose layout template -> Extract key content -> Design poster -> Print test at reduced size -> Final print

Promotion Workflow

Paper accepted -> Write Twitter thread -> Create LinkedIn post -> Draft blog post -> Schedule posts around conference dates

Best Practices

Presentation

  • Start with the "so what" - why should the audience care
  • Tell a story: problem -> insight -> solution -> impact
  • Use concrete examples and demos when possible
  • Anticipate questions and prepare answers
  • Arrive early to test equipment

Poster

  • Design for scanning, not reading
  • Use visual hierarchy to guide the eye
  • Include a "elevator pitch" summary
  • Bring business cards or QR codes
  • Practice a 2-minute and 5-minute explanation

Promotion

  • Post within 1-2 weeks of acceptance notification
  • Coordinate timing with co-authors
  • Engage with comments and questions
  • Share across multiple platforms
  • Include accessible descriptions for figures

Summary

This skill provides a comprehensive post-acceptance workflow covering three key areas: presentation slides, academic posters, and promotional content. Following these guidelines helps researchers effectively communicate their work at conferences and to the broader community.

Reference Files

Load only what is needed:

  • references/design-guidelines.md - visual design guidance
  • references/deliverable-checklists.md - slide/poster/promo-specific checklists
  • examples/post-acceptance-plan.md - compact delivery plan example

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する