本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

research-setup

Interactive setup wizard that configures a new project for the social-science-research plugin. Asks the user questions about their field, institution, journals, datasets, key researchers, and R color palette, then writes the answers into references/domain-profile.md and CLAUDE.md. Make sure to use this skill first whenever a user is starting fresh or wants to configure the plugin. Triggers include: "set up my project", "configure the plugin", "run setup", "initialize this project", "I just installed the plugin", "set my field", "set my institution", "configure my domain profile", or any request to personalize the plugin for a specific research context.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Research Setup Wizard

Walk the user through setup using AskUserQuestion menus wherever possible. Collect all answers, then write config files in one pass.


Step 0: Check Existing Config

Read CLAUDE.md and references/domain-profile.md silently. If either has real content (not placeholders), tell the user what's already configured and offer to confirm or update each section.


Step 1: Field & Identity

AskUserQuestion — 2 questions at once:

  1. Field (single select, header: "Field"): "What is your field or subfield?" — Options: "Political Science", "Economics", "Sociology", "Public Health". User selects Other for unlisted fields.

  2. Institution (single select, header: "Institution"): "What is your institution?" — Options: "Duke University", "Harvard University", "Stanford University", "UC Berkeley". User selects Other for unlisted fields.

Store field and institution for customizing later steps.


Step 2: Name & Project Title

Ask conversationally (not via AskUserQuestion):

  1. "What is your name (for paper authorship)? You can skip this for now."
  2. "Do you have a working title for your current project? Fine to skip if you're still exploring."

Wait for the user's response before moving to Step 3.


Step 3: Journals

AskUserQuestion — 2 multi-select questions based on the user's field:

  1. Top journals (multiSelect, header: "Top journals"): "Select your top journals (pick all that apply):" — Offer the 4 most prestigious journals for the user's selected field. Use your knowledge of the field's top venues.

  2. Secondary journals (multiSelect, header: "Secondary"): "Select secondary or subfield journals:" — Offer 4 secondary/subfield journals appropriate to the user's field.

User can multi-select presets and add custom journals via Other.


Step 4: Datasets

AskUserQuestion — 2 multi-select questions based on the user's field:

  1. Common datasets (multiSelect, header: "Datasets"): "Which datasets do you commonly use?" — Offer the 4 most-used datasets for the user's field. Use your knowledge of field-standard data sources.

  2. Additional sources (multiSelect, header: "More data"): "Any additional data sources?" — Offer 4 cross-disciplinary sources: World Bank Open Data, IPUMS, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Census Bureau.


Step 5: Researchers & Colors

AskUserQuestion — 2 questions at once:

  1. Researchers (single select, header: "Researchers"): "Add key researchers for targeted literature searches?" — Options: "Skip for now" / "Add researchers".

  2. Colors (single select, header: "Colors"): "Which color palette should R figures use?" — If the institution is well-known, offer its official brand colors as the recommended option with a preview showing the hex codes. Otherwise offer: "Custom colors" / "Skip for now".

If the user chose "Add researchers", ask conversationally for names, institutions, and Google Scholar URLs. Do NOT guess researcher names.

If the user chose "Custom colors", ask conversationally for primary and secondary hex codes.


Step 6: Write Config Files

references/domain-profile.md

Read the existing file and update each section with the user's answers. Preserve the file's existing structure and comments. Only replace sections the user answered; leave unanswered sections unchanged. Add an "Institutional Colors" section at the end if one doesn't exist, with the user's hex codes (or defaults #012169 / #f2a900 if skipped).

IMPORTANT: Do NOT write to rules/r-code-conventions.md. Colors live in references/domain-profile.md only.

CLAUDE.md

Update the project header placeholders:

  • [YOUR PROJECT NAME] → user's project title (or leave placeholder if skipped)
  • [YOUR NAME] → user's name (or leave placeholder if skipped)
  • [YOUR INSTITUTION] → user's institution

Step 7: Confirm

Setup complete:
- references/domain-profile.md — field, [N] journals, [N] datasets[, N researchers][, colors]
- CLAUDE.md — project name and institution

Update anytime: references/domain-profile.md
Next step: /new-project

Note any skipped sections and where to add them later.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する