本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

skill-development

This skill should be used when the user asks to create a new skill, repair an existing skill, improve trigger descriptions, reorganize skill structure, or make a Claude skill more reusable and internally consistent.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(4)

  • SKILL.md4.4 KB
  • references/checklist.md640 B
  • references/integrity-checks.md610 B
  • references/skill-creator-original.md11.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Skill Development

Use this skill to create or repair Claude skills in the current local environment, not in an abstract plugin template.

Goal

Produce a skill that is:

  • easy to trigger,
  • lean at the SKILL.md layer,
  • backed by real references/, examples/, and scripts/ files when they are mentioned,
  • free of dead local references.

Core rules

  • Keep one skill = one durable job.
  • Treat the frontmatter description as the main trigger surface.
  • Keep SKILL.md focused on workflow and boundaries.
  • Move detailed catalogs, templates, and long explanations into references/ or examples/.
  • Do not mention files that do not exist.
  • Do not inherit stale names, agents, or sibling skill references without verifying they exist locally.

Default workflow

1. Inspect the current environment first

Before writing anything:

  • inspect the target skill directory,
  • inspect neighboring skills that already solve a similar problem,
  • verify which agents, commands, and sibling skills actually exist,
  • identify stale references before adding new ones.

Use the local inventory as the authority. Do not write guidance against an imagined plugin layout.

2. Lock the skill contract

Define four things before editing:

  1. what the skill does,
  2. what triggers it,
  3. what it explicitly does not do,
  4. which bundled resources are actually needed.

If the skill only needs a short workflow, keep it short. Do not create references/, examples/, or scripts/ just because the directories are conventional.

3. Write or repair the frontmatter

The frontmatter should:

  • use the real skill identifier in name,
  • use a third-person trigger description,
  • include concrete phrases a user would naturally say,
  • stay short enough to scan quickly.

Prefer descriptions of this form:

---
name: skill-name
description: This skill should be used when the user asks to "...", "...", or needs help with ....
---

4. Keep the main file lean

A good SKILL.md should usually contain:

  • a short goal section,
  • role boundaries,
  • a default workflow,
  • safety or quality rules,
  • a short list of additional resources.

Move these out of the main file when they get long:

  • templates,
  • exhaustive checklists,
  • edge-case catalogs,
  • sample outputs,
  • long examples.

5. Add only real bundled resources

Use bundled resources deliberately:

  • references/ for detailed guidance that may be loaded selectively,
  • examples/ for real example outputs or scaffolds,
  • scripts/ for deterministic helper logic.

If a resource is mentioned in SKILL.md, it must exist. If a resource exists but is never referenced or used, delete it.

6. Run integrity checks before closing

At minimum, verify:

  • frontmatter parses,
  • referenced local files exist,
  • sibling skill or agent references are real,
  • SKILL.md is not overloaded with material that belongs in references,
  • temporary logs, caches, and editor artifacts are not left inside the skill directory.

Typical repair patterns

When the skill is too long

  • keep the trigger and workflow in SKILL.md,
  • move catalogs and deep detail into references/,
  • keep a short read order so another model knows what to load first.

When the skill is too thin

  • add a default workflow,
  • add at least one concrete example or checklist,
  • make the boundaries explicit so the skill is not just a slogan.

When the skill has stale references

  • remove dead paths immediately,
  • replace historical names with current local names,
  • re-check neighboring agents/commands/skills against the live directory.

Recommended output shape

When creating or repairing a skill, prefer ending with:

  • what changed,
  • which files were created or updated,
  • what integrity checks were run,
  • what still needs manual follow-up, if anything.

References

Load only what is needed:

  • references/checklist.md - compact quality checklist before closing a skill edit
  • references/integrity-checks.md - concrete local checks for missing files, dead references, and drift
  • references/skill-creator-original.md - legacy background reference; use for context, not as the live source of truth

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5992026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5992026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5992026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5992026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5992026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5992026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する