本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

skill-improver

This skill should be used when the user asks to "apply skill improvements", "update skill from plan", "execute improvement plan", "fix skill issues", "implement skill recommendations", or mentions applying improvements from quality review reports. Reads improvement-plan-{name}.md files generated by skill-quality-reviewer and intelligently merges and executes the suggested changes to improve Claude Skills quality.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(9)

  • SKILL.md6.9 KB
  • examples/improvement-plan-example.md2.0 KB
  • examples/update-report-example.md1.2 KB
  • references/error-handling.md812 B
  • references/merge-strategies.md14.1 KB
  • references/plan-format.md10.6 KB
  • references/supported-updates.md791 B
  • scripts/backup-skill.sh1.4 KB
  • scripts/verify-update.sh6.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Skill Improver

Execute improvement plans generated by skill-quality-reviewer to automatically update and fix issues in Claude Skills.

Core Workflow

Read improvement-plan-{name}.md
    ↓
Parse improvement items (High/Medium/Low priority)
    ↓
Group changes by file
    ↓
Detect and resolve conflicts
    ↓
Backup original files
    ↓
Execute updates (Edit or Write tools)
    ↓
Verify results
    ↓
Generate update-report

When to Use

Trigger phrases:

  • "Apply improvements from improvement-plan-git-workflow.md"
  • "Update my skill based on the quality report"
  • "Execute the improvement plan for api-helper"
  • "Fix the issues identified in quality review"

Use this skill when:

  • Applying improvements from an improvement plan
  • Updating a skill based on quality review feedback
  • Executing recommended fixes from skill-quality-reviewer
  • Implementing structured improvements to skill documentation

Step-by-Step Guide

Step 1: Load the Improvement Plan

Read the improvement-plan-{skill-name}.md file generated by skill-quality-reviewer.

# Plan is typically in current directory
ls improvement-plan-*.md

# Or specify full path
read /path/to/improvement-plan-my-skill.md

Validate the plan:

  • File exists and is readable
  • Contains priority sections (High/Medium/Low)
  • Has structured improvement items
  • Includes file paths and suggested changes

See references/plan-format.md for detailed plan structure.

Step 2: Parse and Group Changes

Extract all improvement suggestions and organize by target file.

Extract from each item:

  • File path (e.g., SKILL.md:line:line or references/file.md)
  • Dimension (Description Quality, Content Organization, etc.)
  • Impact (+X points)
  • Current content
  • Suggested content
  • Reason for change

Build update queue:

by_file = {
  "SKILL.md": [change1, change2, ...],
  "references/guide.md": [change3, ...],
  "examples/demo.md": [change4, ...],
}

Step 3: Detect and Resolve Conflicts

Check for conflicts when multiple changes affect the same content.

Resolution strategy:

  1. High priority takes precedence over medium/low
  2. If same priority, preserve first change
  3. Flag conflicts for manual review
  4. Document resolution in update report

See references/merge-strategies.md for detailed merge logic.

Step 4: Sort by Priority

Order changes by priority within each file.

Priority order:

  1. High Priority (execute first)
  2. Medium Priority (execute second)
  3. Low Priority (execute last)

Step 5: Backup and Execute

Backup location: ~/.claude/skills/backup/{skill-name}-{timestamp}/

# Use backup script
~/.claude/skills/skill-improver/scripts/backup-skill.sh <skill-path>

Apply changes:

  • Use Edit tool for existing content
  • Use Write tool for new files
  • Verify each change was applied

Step 6: Verify and Report

Verification checks:

  1. YAML syntax valid
  2. All modified files exist and are valid
  3. New files were created successfully
  4. No unintended changes occurred
# Use verify script
~/.claude/skills/skill-improver/scripts/verify-update.sh <skill-path>

Generate update-report-{skill-name}-{timestamp}.md documenting:

  • Summary (files modified, files created, total changes)
  • Changes Applied (per-file breakdown)
  • Quality Improvement (before/after scores)
  • Verification Results
  • Backup Location

See examples/update-report-example.md for report template.

Priority Handling

High Priority

Execute first. These typically address:

  • Critical description issues
  • Major writing style problems
  • Missing structural elements
  • Security-related concerns

Medium Priority

Execute after High. These typically address:

  • Content organization improvements
  • Additional examples
  • Documentation enhancements

Low Priority

Execute last. These typically address:

  • Minor clarifications
  • Nice-to-have improvements
  • Polish and refinement

Integration with Skill Quality Reviewer

This skill works seamlessly with skill-quality-reviewer:

Current Skill (67/100 D+)
    ↓ [skill-quality-reviewer]
Improvement Plan
    ↓ [skill-improver]
Improved Skill (87/100 B+)
    ↓ [skill-quality-reviewer]
Quality Report (validation)

Iterate until desired quality level reached.

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/plan-format.md - Improvement plan file structure and format
  • references/merge-strategies.md - Detailed merge algorithms and conflict resolution
  • references/error-handling.md - Error handling strategies
  • references/supported-updates.md - Supported update types with examples

Example Files

  • examples/improvement-plan-example.md - Sample improvement plan
  • examples/update-report-example.md - Sample update report

Scripts

  • scripts/backup-skill.sh - Create backup of skill before updates
  • scripts/verify-update.sh - Verify skill integrity after updates

Best Practices

Before Applying Updates

  1. Review the improvement plan - Understand what will change
  2. Verify backup location - Ensure backups can be restored
  3. Check for manual changes - Note any uncommitted local modifications
  4. Estimate impact - Review expected quality improvement

During Update Execution

  1. Process in priority order - High → Medium → Low
  2. Verify after each file - Check updates were applied correctly
  3. Log all changes - Document what was modified
  4. Handle conflicts gracefully - Flag for review if needed

After Applying Updates

  1. Review the update report - Confirm all changes were intended
  2. Test the skill - Verify it still works correctly
  3. Compare scores - Check quality improvement matches expectations
  4. Keep backup - Retain backup until confident in changes

Usage Examples

Example 1: Apply improvements to local skill

User: "Apply improvements from improvement-plan-git-workflow.md"

[Claude executes the workflow:]
1. Reads improvement-plan-git-workflow.md
2. Parses all improvement items
3. Groups changes by file
4. Detects and resolves conflicts
5. Sorts by priority
6. Backs up git-workflow skill
7. Executes updates
8. Verifies results
9. Generates update-report-git-workflow-timestamp.md

Example 2: Update skill from quality review

User: "Update my api-helper skill based on quality report"

[Claude:]
1. Locates improvement-plan-api-helper.md
2. Applies all recommended changes
3. Verifies skill structure
4. Reports quality improvement: 72/100 → 91/100

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する