本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

split-pdf

Download, split, and deeply read academic PDFs. Use when asked to read, review, or summarize an academic paper. Splits PDFs into 4-page chunks, reads them in small batches, and produces structured reading notes — avoiding context window crashes and shallow comprehension.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB
  • methodology.md4.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Split-PDF: Download, Split, and Deep-Read Academic Papers

CRITICAL RULE: Never read a full PDF. Never. Only read the 4-page split files, and only 3 splits at a time (~12 pages). Reading a full PDF will either crash the session with an unrecoverable "prompt too long" error — destroying all context — or produce shallow, hallucinated output. There are no exceptions.

When This Skill Is Invoked

The user wants you to read, review, or summarize an academic paper. The input is either:

  • A file path to a local PDF (e.g., ./articles/smith_2024.pdf)
  • A search query or paper title (e.g., "Gentzkow Shapiro Sinkinson 2014 competition newspapers")

Important: You cannot search for a paper you don't know exists. The user MUST provide either a file path or a specific search query — an author name, a title, keywords, a year, or some combination that identifies the paper. If the user invokes this skill without specifying what paper to read, ask them. Do not guess.

Step 1: Acquire the PDF

If a local file path is provided:

  • Verify the file exists
  • If the file is NOT already inside ./articles/, copy it there (do not move — preserve the original location)
  • Proceed to Step 2

If a search query or paper title is provided:

  1. Use WebSearch to find the paper
  2. Use WebFetch or Bash (curl/wget) to download the PDF
  3. Save it to ./articles/ in the project directory (create the directory if needed)
  4. Proceed to Step 2

CRITICAL: Always preserve the original PDF. The downloaded or provided PDF in ./articles/ must NEVER be deleted, moved, or overwritten at any point in this workflow. The split files are derivatives — the original is the permanent artifact. Do not clean up, do not remove, do not tidy. The original stays.

Step 2: Split the PDF

Create a subdirectory for the splits and run the splitting script:

from PyPDF2 import PdfReader, PdfWriter
import os, sys

def split_pdf(input_path, output_dir, pages_per_chunk=4):
    os.makedirs(output_dir, exist_ok=True)
    reader = PdfReader(input_path)
    total = len(reader.pages)
    prefix = os.path.splitext(os.path.basename(input_path))[0]

    for start in range(0, total, pages_per_chunk):
        end = min(start + pages_per_chunk, total)
        writer = PdfWriter()
        for i in range(start, end):
            writer.add_page(reader.pages[i])

        out_name = f"{prefix}_pp{start+1}-{end}.pdf"
        out_path = os.path.join(output_dir, out_name)
        with open(out_path, "wb") as f:
            writer.write(f)

    print(f"Split {total} pages into {-(-total // pages_per_chunk)} chunks in {output_dir}")

Directory convention:

articles/
├── smith_2024.pdf                    # original PDF — NEVER DELETE THIS
└── split_smith_2024/                 # split subdirectory
    ├── smith_2024_pp1-4.pdf
    ├── smith_2024_pp5-8.pdf
    ├── smith_2024_pp9-12.pdf
    └── ...

The original PDF remains in articles/ permanently. The splits are working copies. If anything goes wrong, you can always re-split from the original.

If PyPDF2 is not installed, install it: pip install PyPDF2

Step 3: Read in Batches of 3 Splits

Read exactly 3 split files at a time (~12 pages). After each batch:

  1. Read the 3 split PDFs using the Read tool
  2. Update the running notes file (notes.md in the split subdirectory)
  3. Pause and tell the user:

"I have finished reading splits [X-Y] and updated the notes. I have [N] more splits remaining. Would you like me to continue with the next 3?"

  1. Wait for the user to confirm before reading the next batch

Do NOT read ahead. Do NOT read all splits at once. The pause-and-confirm protocol is mandatory.

Step 4: Structured Extraction

As you read, collect information along these dimensions and write them into notes.md:

  1. Research question — What is the paper asking and why does it matter?
  2. Audience — Which sub-community of researchers cares about this?
  3. Method — How do they answer the question? What is the identification strategy?
  4. Data — What data do they use? Where precisely did they find it? What is the unit of observation? Sample size? Time period?
  5. Statistical methods — What econometric or statistical techniques do they use? What are the key specifications?
  6. Findings — What are the main results? Key coefficient estimates and standard errors?
  7. Contributions — What is learned from this exercise that we didn't know before?
  8. Replication feasibility — Is the data publicly available? Is there a replication archive? A data appendix? URLs for the underlying data?

These questions extract what a researcher needs to build on or replicate the work — a structured extraction more detailed and specific than a typical summary.

The Notes File

The output is notes.md in the split subdirectory:

articles/split_smith_2024/notes.md

This file is updated incrementally after each batch. Structure it with clear headers for each of the 8 dimensions. After each batch, update whichever dimensions have new information — do not rewrite from scratch.

By the time all splits are read, the notes should contain specific data sources, variable names, equation references, sample sizes, coefficient estimates, and standard errors. Not a summary — a structured extraction.

When NOT to Split

  • Papers shorter than ~15 pages: read directly (still use the Read tool, not Bash)
  • Policy briefs or non-technical documents: a rough summary is fine
  • Triage only: read just the first split (pages 1-4) for abstract and introduction

Quick Reference

StepAction
AcquireDownload to ./articles/ or use existing local file
Split4-page chunks into ./articles/split_<name>/
Read3 splits at a time, pause after each batch
WriteUpdate notes.md with structured extraction
ConfirmAsk user before continuing to next batch

For detailed explanation of why this method works, see methodology.md.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5972026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する