STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This skill is a code pattern library, not a methodological advisor.
| Can Do | Cannot Do |
|---|---|
| Show how published papers implemented methods | Explain when to use one method over another |
| Provide tested STATA syntax | Advise on identification strategy |
| Indicate which robustness tests accompany analyses | Discuss research design trade-offs |
| Cite source papers for code patterns | Recommend optimal research design |
When users ask methodology questions (e.g., "Should I use entropy balancing or PSM?", "How do I address endogeneity?", "Is my identification strategy valid?"):
Use references/REFERENCES.md as the primary index, then read targeted .do files.
Search references/REFERENCES.md to identify relevant papers. The index contains structured metadata:
Example queries on REFERENCES.md:
Read only the identified .do files to extract actual syntax. This reduces context usage and improves accuracy.
For very specific syntax queries (e.g., "how does absorb() handle singletons?"), grep .do files directly:
| Task | Grep Pattern |
|---|---|
| Panel regressions | reghdfe|xtreg|areg |
| Fixed effects | absorb\(|i\.year|i\.firm |
| Clustering | cluster\(|vce\(cluster |
| Matching/PSM | psmatch2|teffects|cem|ebalance|pscore |
| IV regression | xtivreg|ivregress|ivreg2 |
| DiD | post.*treat|treat.*post|parallel.*trend |
| RDD | rdrobust|rddensity |
| Event studies | CAR|BHAR|abnormal.*return |
| Survival | stcox|streg|stset |
| Fama-MacBeth | fama.?macbeth|newey.*west |
| Bootstrap | bootstrap|bsample |
| Quantile regression | qreg|sqreg|bsqreg |
| Table output | esttab|outreg2|eststo |
| Winsorization | winsor|winsor2 |
126 STATA .do files from JAR Volumes 55-63 (2017-2025). See references/REFERENCES.md for complete catalog with paper titles and authors.
JAR_{volume}_{shortcode}.doJAR_{volume}_{issue}_{shortcode}_{authors}.do| Volume | Year | Papers |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | 2017 | 9 |
| 56 | 2018 | 12 |
| 57 | 2019 | 9 |
| 58 | 2020 | 13 |
| 59 | 2021 | 4 |
| 60 | 2022 | 22 |
| 61 | 2023 | 22 |
| 62 | 2024 | 25 |
| 63 | 2025 | 10 |
* Firm and year FE with firm-clustered SEs (most common)
reghdfe depvar indepvar controls, absorb(firm year) cluster(firm)
* Industry-year FE
reghdfe depvar indepvar controls, absorb(ind_year) cluster(firm)
eststo clear
eststo: reghdfe depvar indepvar controls, absorb(firm year) cluster(firm)
esttab using "table.tex", replace star(* 0.10 ** 0.05 *** 0.01) se
winsor2 varlist, cuts(1 99) replace
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。