本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

stats

Econometrics skill for descriptive statistics and summary tables. Activates when the user asks about: "descriptive statistics", "summary statistics", "summary table", "Table 1", "balance table", "means and standard deviations", "correlation matrix", "data summary", "sample characteristics", "variable distributions", "描述性统计", "描述统计", "汇总统计", "统计表", "均值标准差", "平衡性检验", "相关矩阵", "样本特征", "变量分布"

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.9 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Descriptive Statistics & Summary Tables Skill

This skill generates publication-quality summary statistics tables, balance tables, and correlation matrices — the essential "Table 1" found in every empirical economics paper.

When to Use

  • Before any regression: Summarize your sample to understand distributions and detect issues
  • For "Data" section of papers: Standard Table 1 with means, SDs, and sample sizes
  • Treatment/control comparison: Balance tables with t-tests or normalized differences
  • Variable relationships: Correlation matrices for initial exploration

Summary Statistics Table (Table 1)

Python

# Python — publication-quality summary stats
import pandas as pd

# Basic summary stats
desc = df[['income', 'age', 'education', 'hours_worked']].describe().T
desc = desc[['count', 'mean', 'std', 'min', '25%', '50%', '75%', 'max']]
desc.columns = ['N', 'Mean', 'SD', 'Min', 'P25', 'Median', 'P75', 'Max']
print(desc.round(3).to_string())

# Using tableone for clinical/econ style Table 1
# pip install tableone
from tableone import TableOne
table1 = TableOne(df, columns=['income', 'age', 'education', 'hours_worked'],
                  categorical=['female', 'race'],
                  groupby='treatment', pval=True)
print(table1.tabulate(tablefmt="github"))
table1.to_excel("table1.xlsx")

R

# R — modelsummary::datasummary
library(modelsummary)

# Full descriptive table
datasummary(income + age + education + hours_worked ~
            N + Mean + SD + Min + Median + Max,
            data = df,
            output = "table1.tex")   # or .docx, .html

# By group (treatment/control)
datasummary(income + age + education ~
            treatment * (N + Mean + SD),
            data = df,
            output = "balance.tex")

# Alternative: stargazer
library(stargazer)
stargazer(df[, c("income", "age", "education", "hours_worked")],
          type = "latex",
          summary.stat = c("n", "mean", "sd", "min", "median", "max"),
          title = "Summary Statistics",
          out = "table1.tex")

Stata

* Stata — estpost/esttab for summary stats
estpost summarize income age education hours_worked, detail
esttab using "table1.tex", cells("count mean(fmt(3)) sd(fmt(3)) min max") ///
    nomtitle nonumber label replace title("Summary Statistics")

* By group
estpost ttest income age education hours_worked, by(treatment)
esttab using "balance.tex", cells("mu_1(fmt(3)) mu_2(fmt(3)) b(fmt(3) star)") ///
    star(* 0.10 ** 0.05 *** 0.01) replace ///
    collabels("Control" "Treatment" "Diff") ///
    title("Balance Table")

* Alternative: asdoc (simpler)
asdoc summarize income age education hours_worked, stat(N mean sd min max) ///
    save(table1.doc) replace

Balance Tables (Treatment vs Control)

Normalized Differences

Preferred over t-tests for balance assessment (Imbens & Rubin 2015): Δ = (X̄₁ − X̄₀) / √(S₁² + S₀²). Rule: |Δ| < 0.25 is acceptable.

# Python — normalized differences
import numpy as np

def normalized_diff(treated, control):
    return (treated.mean() - control.mean()) / \
           np.sqrt(treated.var() + control.var())

for col in ['income', 'age', 'education']:
    nd = normalized_diff(df.loc[df.treatment==1, col],
                         df.loc[df.treatment==0, col])
    print(f"{col}: Norm. Diff. = {nd:.3f} {'✓' if abs(nd) < 0.25 else '✗'}")
# R — cobalt for comprehensive balance
library(cobalt)
bal.tab(treatment ~ income + age + education + female,
        data = df, thresholds = c(m = 0.25),
        stats = c("mean.diffs", "variance.ratios"))
love.plot(treatment ~ income + age + education + female,
          data = df, binary = "std", threshold = 0.25)
* Stata — balance table with normalized differences
* After matching or for raw comparison:
iebaltab income age education female, grpvar(treatment) ///
    save("balance.xlsx") replace rowvarlabel ///
    pttest starsnoadd normdiff

Correlation Matrix

# Python — correlation matrix with significance
import scipy.stats as stats

vars = ['income', 'age', 'education', 'hours_worked']
corr = df[vars].corr()

# With p-values
def corr_with_pval(df, vars):
    n = len(vars)
    corr_mat = pd.DataFrame(index=vars, columns=vars)
    pval_mat = pd.DataFrame(index=vars, columns=vars)
    for i in range(n):
        for j in range(n):
            r, p = stats.pearsonr(df[vars[i]].dropna(), df[vars[j]].dropna())
            corr_mat.iloc[i,j] = f"{r:.3f}{'***' if p<.01 else '**' if p<.05 else '*' if p<.1 else ''}"
    return corr_mat

print(corr_with_pval(df, vars))
# R — correlation matrix
library(modelsummary)
datasummary_correlation(df[, c("income", "age", "education", "hours_worked")],
                        output = "correlation.tex")

# With significance stars
library(Hmisc)
rcorr(as.matrix(df[, c("income", "age", "education")]))
* Stata — correlation matrix with significance
pwcorr income age education hours_worked, star(0.05) sig
* Export to LaTeX:
estpost correlate income age education hours_worked, matrix
esttab using "corr.tex", unstack not noobs replace

Missing Data Summary

# Python — missing data report
missing = df.isnull().sum()
missing_pct = (missing / len(df) * 100).round(2)
missing_report = pd.DataFrame({'N_Missing': missing, 'Pct_Missing': missing_pct})
missing_report = missing_report[missing_report.N_Missing > 0].sort_values('Pct_Missing', ascending=False)
print(missing_report)
# R — missing data summary
library(naniar)
miss_var_summary(df)
vis_miss(df)    # missingness heatmap
* Stata — missing data
misstable summarize
misstable patterns

Reporting Standards

For the "Data" Section of Papers

  1. Table 1: N, Mean, SD (and optionally Min, Max, Median) for all variables used in analysis
  2. Panel structure: If panel data, report N units, T periods, and total N×T
  3. Balance table: If treatment/control design, show balance with t-tests or normalized differences
  4. Sample construction: Note any sample restrictions (e.g., "dropped observations with missing income")
  5. Winsorization: If applied, note percentiles (e.g., "winsorized at 1st and 99th percentiles")

Formatting Conventions

ConventionDetails
Decimal places2–3 for continuous variables; 3 for proportions
Standard errorsIn parentheses below means (if reporting SE of mean)
Stars on differences* p<0.10, ** p<0.05, *** p<0.01
Sample sizeReport N per column and per variable if different
NotesState data source, sample period, variable definitions

Common Pitfalls

  • Reporting means for skewed variables: Use median or log-transform for income, firm size, etc.
  • Ignoring missingness: Always report % missing for each variable
  • Balance test p-hacking: Use normalized differences instead of t-tests; many variables will be "significant" by chance with large N
  • Wrong clustering for SE: Summary stats use individual-level data but main analysis may cluster at group level

Related Skills & Commands

  • /analyze: Full analysis workflow that starts with descriptive statistics
  • ols-regression: Proceed to regression after describing your data
  • matching: Balance tables are critical for matching-based designs
  • table: Advanced formatting for publication-quality tables
  • /plot: Visualize distributions and correlations

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6042026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6042026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6042026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6042026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6042026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,6042026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する