本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

web-design-reviewer

This skill enables visual inspection of websites running locally or remotely to identify and fix design issues. Triggers on requests like "review website design", "check the UI", "fix the layout", "find design problems". Detects issues with responsive design, accessibility, visual consistency, and layout breakage, then performs fixes at the source code level.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md10.3 KB
  • references/framework-fixes.md7.3 KB
  • references/visual-checklist.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Web Design Reviewer

This skill enables visual inspection and validation of website design quality, identifying and fixing issues at the source code level.

Scope of Application

  • Static sites (HTML/CSS/JS)
  • SPA frameworks such as React / Vue / Angular / Svelte
  • Full-stack frameworks such as Next.js / Nuxt / SvelteKit
  • CMS platforms such as WordPress / Drupal
  • Any other web application

Prerequisites

Required

  1. Target website must be running

    • Local development server (e.g., http://localhost:3000)
    • Staging environment
    • Production environment (for read-only reviews)
  2. Browser automation must be available

    • Screenshot capture
    • Page navigation
    • DOM information retrieval
  3. Access to source code (when making fixes)

    • Project must exist within the workspace

Workflow Overview

flowchart TD
    A[Step 1: Information Gathering] --> B[Step 2: Visual Inspection]
    B --> C[Step 3: Issue Fixing]
    C --> D[Step 4: Re-verification]
    D --> E{Issues Remaining?}
    E -->|Yes| B
    E -->|No| F[Completion Report]

Step 1: Information Gathering Phase

1.1 URL Confirmation

If the URL is not provided, ask the user:

Please provide the URL of the website to review (e.g., http://localhost:3000)

1.2 Understanding Project Structure

When making fixes, gather the following information:

ItemExample Question
FrameworkAre you using React / Vue / Next.js, etc.?
Styling MethodCSS / SCSS / Tailwind / CSS-in-JS, etc.
Source LocationWhere are style files and components located?
Review ScopeSpecific pages only or entire site?

1.3 Automatic Project Detection

Attempt automatic detection from files in the workspace:

Detection targets:
├── package.json     → Framework and dependencies
├── tsconfig.json    → TypeScript usage
├── tailwind.config  → Tailwind CSS
├── next.config      → Next.js
├── vite.config      → Vite
├── nuxt.config      → Nuxt
└── src/ or app/     → Source directory

1.4 Identifying Styling Method

MethodDetectionEdit Target
Pure CSS*.css filesGlobal CSS or component CSS
SCSS/Sass*.scss, *.sassSCSS files
CSS Modules*.module.cssModule CSS files
Tailwind CSStailwind.config.*className in components
styled-componentsstyled. in codeJS/TS files
Emotion@emotion/ importsJS/TS files
CSS-in-JS (other)Inline stylesJS/TS files

Step 2: Visual Inspection Phase

2.1 Page Traversal

  1. Navigate to the specified URL
  2. Capture screenshots
  3. Retrieve DOM structure/snapshot (if possible)
  4. If additional pages exist, traverse through navigation

2.2 Inspection Items

Layout Issues

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Element OverflowContent overflows from parent element or viewportHigh
Element OverlapUnintended overlapping of elementsHigh
Alignment IssuesGrid or flex alignment problemsMedium
Inconsistent SpacingPadding/margin inconsistenciesMedium
Text ClippingLong text not handled properlyMedium

Responsive Issues

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Non-mobile FriendlyLayout breaks on small screensHigh
Breakpoint IssuesUnnatural transitions when screen size changesMedium
Touch TargetsButtons too small on mobileMedium

Accessibility Issues

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Insufficient ContrastLow contrast ratio between text and backgroundHigh
No Focus StateCannot determine state during keyboard navigationHigh
Missing alt TextNo alternative text for imagesMedium

Visual Consistency

IssueDescriptionSeverity
Font InconsistencyMixed font familiesMedium
Color InconsistencyNon-unified brand colorsMedium
Spacing InconsistencyNon-uniform spacing between similar elementsLow

2.3 Viewport Testing (Responsive)

Test at the following viewports:

NameWidthRepresentative Device
Mobile375pxiPhone SE/12 mini
Tablet768pxiPad
Desktop1280pxStandard PC
Wide1920pxLarge display

Step 3: Issue Fixing Phase

3.1 Issue Prioritization

block-beta
    columns 1
    block:priority["Priority Matrix"]
        P1["P1: Fix Immediately\n(Layout issues affecting functionality)"]
        P2["P2: Fix Next\n(Visual issues degrading UX)"]
        P3["P3: Fix If Possible\n(Minor visual inconsistencies)"]
    end

3.2 Identifying Source Files

Identify source files from problematic elements:

  1. Selector-based Search

    • Search codebase by class name or ID
    • Explore style definitions with grep_search
  2. Component-based Search

    • Identify components from element text or structure
    • Explore related files with semantic_search
  3. File Pattern Filtering

    Style files: src/**/*.css, styles/**/*
    Components: src/components/**/*
    Pages: src/pages/**, app/**
    

3.3 Applying Fixes

Framework-specific Fix Guidelines

See references/framework-fixes.md for details.

Fix Principles

  1. Minimal Changes: Only make the minimum changes necessary to resolve the issue
  2. Respect Existing Patterns: Follow existing code style in the project
  3. Avoid Breaking Changes: Be careful not to affect other areas
  4. Add Comments: Add comments to explain the reason for fixes where appropriate

Step 4: Re-verification Phase

4.1 Post-fix Confirmation

  1. Reload browser (or wait for development server HMR)
  2. Capture screenshots of fixed areas
  3. Compare before and after

4.2 Regression Testing

  • Verify that fixes haven't affected other areas
  • Confirm responsive display is not broken

4.3 Iteration Decision

flowchart TD
    A{Issues Remaining?}
    A -->|Yes| B[Return to Step 2]
    A -->|No| C[Proceed to Completion Report]

Iteration Limit: If more than 3 fix attempts are needed for a specific issue, consult the user


Output Format

Review Results Report

# Web Design Review Results

## Summary

| Item | Value |
|------|-------|
| Target URL | {URL} |
| Framework | {Detected framework} |
| Styling | {CSS / Tailwind / etc.} |
| Tested Viewports | Desktop, Mobile |
| Issues Detected | {N} |
| Issues Fixed | {M} |

## Detected Issues

### [P1] {Issue Title}

- **Page**: {Page path}
- **Element**: {Selector or description}
- **Issue**: {Detailed description of the issue}
- **Fixed File**: `{File path}`
- **Fix Details**: {Description of changes}
- **Screenshot**: Before/After

### [P2] {Issue Title}
...

## Unfixed Issues (if any)

### {Issue Title}
- **Reason**: {Why it was not fixed/could not be fixed}
- **Recommended Action**: {Recommendations for user}

## Recommendations

- {Suggestions for future improvements}

Required Capabilities

CapabilityDescriptionRequired
Web Page NavigationAccess URLs, page transitions✅
Screenshot CapturePage image capture✅
Image AnalysisVisual issue detection✅
DOM RetrievalPage structure retrievalRecommended
File Read/WriteSource code reading and editingRequired for fixes
Code SearchCode search within projectRequired for fixes

Reference Implementation

Implementation with Playwright MCP

Playwright MCP is recommended as the reference implementation for this skill.

CapabilityPlaywright MCP ToolPurpose
Navigationbrowser_navigateAccess URLs
Snapshotbrowser_snapshotRetrieve DOM structure
Screenshotbrowser_take_screenshotImages for visual inspection
Clickbrowser_clickInteract with interactive elements
Resizebrowser_resizeResponsive testing
Consolebrowser_console_messagesDetect JS errors

Configuration Example (MCP Server)

{
  "mcpServers": {
    "playwright": {
      "command": "npx",
      "args": ["-y", "@playwright/mcp@latest", "--caps=vision"]
    }
  }
}

Other Compatible Browser Automation Tools

ToolFeatures
SeleniumBroad browser support, multi-language support
PuppeteerChrome/Chromium focused, Node.js
CypressEasy integration with E2E testing
WebDriver BiDiStandardized next-generation protocol

The same workflow can be implemented with these tools. As long as they provide the necessary capabilities (navigation, screenshot, DOM retrieval), the choice of tool is flexible.


Best Practices

DO (Recommended)

  • ✅ Always save screenshots before making fixes
  • ✅ Fix one issue at a time and verify each
  • ✅ Follow the project's existing code style
  • ✅ Confirm with user before major changes
  • ✅ Document fix details thoroughly

DON'T (Not Recommended)

  • ❌ Large-scale refactoring without confirmation
  • ❌ Ignoring design systems or brand guidelines
  • ❌ Fixes that ignore performance
  • ❌ Fixing multiple issues at once (difficult to verify)

Troubleshooting

Problem: Style files not found

  1. Check dependencies in package.json
  2. Consider the possibility of CSS-in-JS
  3. Consider CSS generated at build time
  4. Ask user about styling method

Problem: Fixes not reflected

  1. Check if development server HMR is working
  2. Clear browser cache
  3. Rebuild if project requires build
  4. Check CSS specificity issues

Problem: Fixes affecting other areas

  1. Rollback changes
  2. Use more specific selectors
  3. Consider using CSS Modules or scoped styles
  4. Consult user to confirm impact scope

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

a1

無料

VS-Enhanced Research Question Refiner - Prevents Mode Collapse and derives differentiated research questions Enhanced VS 3-Phase process: Modal question avoidance, alternatives presentation, differentiated RQ recommendation Use when: refining research ideas, formulating research questions, clarifying scope Triggers: research question, 연구 질문, PICO, SPIDER, research idea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a2

無料

VS-Enhanced Theoretical Framework Architect with Critique & Visualization Full VS 5-Phase process: Modal theory avoidance, Long-tail exploration, differentiated framework presentation Absorbed A3 (Devil's Advocate) critique and A6 (Conceptual Framework Visualizer) capabilities Use when: building theoretical foundations, designing conceptual models, deriving hypotheses, critiquing frameworks, visualizing models Triggers: theoretical framework, 이론적 프레임워크, conceptual model, 개념적 모형, hypothesis derivation, critique, devil's advocate, 반론, visualization, diagram

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

a5

無料

Agent A5 - Paradigm & Worldview Advisor - Philosophical foundations for research design. Covers ontology, epistemology, axiology, and methodology alignment. Use when: establishing philosophical foundations, justifying methodological choices, writing positionality statements Triggers: paradigm, 패러다임, ontology, epistemology, worldview, 세계관, philosophical foundations, 철학적 기초

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Academic paper writing skill with 12-agent pipeline. v2.5: Style Calibration (learn author's writing voice from past papers) + Writing Quality Check (writing quality checklist for natural prose). Supports IMRaD, literature review, theoretical, case study, policy brief, and conference paper structures. APA 7.0 (default), Chicago, MLA, IEEE, Vancouver citation formats. Bilingual abstracts (zh-TW + EN). Multi-format output (LaTeX, DOCX, PDF, Markdown). Triggers on: write paper, academic paper, paper outline, write abstract, revise paper, check citations, convert to LaTeX, guide my paper, parse reviews, revision roadmap, 寫論文, 學術論文, 論文大綱, 寫摘要, 修改論文, 檢查引用, 引導我寫論文, 帶我規劃論文, 逐章規劃, 論文架構, 審查意見, 修訂路線圖.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Systematic writing framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers from optimized outline to submission-ready manuscript. Use when users want to: (1) write a paper from a detailed outline, (2) ensure quality control during writing, (3) maintain consistency across chapters, (4) prepare a submission-ready manuscript, or (5) systematically execute a planned paper. Triggered by phrases like 'write the paper from this outline,' 'compose the full manuscript,' 'execute the outline,' or when users have completed strategic planning (academic-paper-strategist skill) and are ready to write. Takes optimized outline as input; outputs complete manuscript with iterative quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills4,5982026年10月12日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する