本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

advmat-figures

Use when designing or auditing figures for an Advanced Materials manuscript, including the lead figure, multi-panel characterization figures, and the Table-of-Contents graphic, where visual quality is a house expectation. Designs figure strategy; does not run the analysis or write prose.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Advanced Materials Figures (advmat-figures)

When to trigger

  • You have many candidate panels and need a coherent figure set
  • Your lead figure does not convey the central advance at a glance
  • Characterization panels are crowded, mislabeled, or unreadable at column width
  • You have no Table-of-Contents (TOC) graphic, or it is an afterthought
  • A coauthor wants to "add one more panel just in case"

Figure strategy for Adv. Mater.

Advanced Materials is a visually demanding journal — striking, cover-quality figures are a house expectation, and the journal actively selects work for cover art. But visual polish must serve the science. The hierarchy:

  • Lead figure (Figure 1) — usually a schematic of the material/design concept plus the single most decisive piece of evidence. A reader skimming should grasp the advance from this figure and its caption alone.
  • Characterization figures — each closes one link of the structure → property → function chain (e.g. one figure for structure by XRD/TEM, one for the property, one for the device + benchmarking).
  • The TOC graphic — a small, self-explaining image plus a short blurb that sells the advance to a browsing reader; treat it as a designed object, not a cropped panel.
  • Everything else — optimization sweeps, extra samples, raw traces → Supporting Information.

If a panel does not advance the central claim or one essential link, move it to the SI.

Multi-panel characterization figures

Materials figures are dense by nature; discipline keeps them readable:

PrinciplePractice
One figure, one linkGroup panels that jointly prove one claim (e.g. all structure)
Reading orderLabel (a),(b),(c) top-left to bottom-right; caption follows it
Scale bars, alwaysEvery micrograph carries a scale bar in the image, not only the caption
Consistent color-codingThe same sample/condition keeps one color across all figures
Annotate the featureArrow/label the lattice fringe, peak, or interface that matters
Overlay, don't scatterShow theory-vs-experiment or before-vs-after on shared axes

Production standards (Wiley format)

  • Design for the journal's two-column layout; check legibility at final printed width.
  • Fonts, axis labels, and tick numbers legible at print size; keep a consistent typeface across figures.
  • Vector formats for line art/schematics; high-resolution raster (meeting Wiley's DPI requirement) for micrographs — verify the current DPI/format spec.
  • Color is free in Adv. Mater. (online and print), but keep palettes color-blind-safe and distinguishable in grayscale; never encode by color alone.
  • Define every symbol, abbreviation, and unit in the caption; give micrographs their scale and technique.
  • Match nomenclature and units to the main text; use SI units and consistent significant figures.

The TOC graphic and cover art

  • The TOC entry (graphic + short text) is a required, high-visibility asset — design it to communicate the advance to a non-specialist in one glance.
  • If aiming for cover consideration, prepare a separate high-resolution cover image; do not repurpose a cramped data panel. Verify current cover-submission format and dimensions.

Checklist

  • Figure 1 conveys the central advance (concept + decisive evidence) at a glance
  • Each figure closes exactly one link of the structure → property → function chain
  • Every micrograph has an in-image scale bar and names its technique
  • Sample/condition color-coding is consistent across all figures
  • Legible at two-column print width; consistent fonts and units
  • Color-blind-safe and grayscale-distinguishable; not color-dependent
  • A designed TOC graphic + blurb exists and sells the advance
  • Non-essential panels/datasets moved to the SI

Anti-patterns

  • A lead figure too dense to parse without the main text
  • Micrographs with no scale bar, or scale bars only mentioned in the caption
  • Ten-panel megafigures that bury the takeaway
  • Inconsistent color-coding of the same sample across figures
  • Color-only encoding that fails in grayscale or for color-blind readers
  • A TOC graphic that is a cropped, unreadable data panel

Output format

【Figure count】N — each essential?  yes / cut list
【Fig. 1 conveys the advance at a glance】yes / redesign
【Per-figure single chain-link】list
【Scale bars on all micrographs】yes / fix
【Consistent color-coding】yes / fix
【Color-blind / grayscale safe】yes / fix
【TOC graphic】designed + blurb?  yes / fix
【Next】advmat-supplementary (SI) or advmat-length-management (fit format)

Figure DPI, format, TOC-graphic, and cover-art specifications are set by Wiley and change — verify current requirements on the official Advanced Materials author page.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する