本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

advmat-supplementary

Use when partitioning content between an Advanced Materials main text and its Supporting Information, ensuring the paper stands alone while extended data, full experimental detail, and secondary characterization live in the SI. Organizes the Supporting Information; does not write the main text.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Advanced Materials Supporting Information (advmat-supplementary)

When to trigger

  • The manuscript is over the Communication/Article format and detail must move out of the body
  • A reader cannot judge the material without opening the SI
  • You have extended datasets, full recipes, or control experiments with no home
  • You are unsure what belongs in the SI versus what must stay in the main text
  • Reviewers of a prior version asked for data that would bloat the body

The stand-alone rule (non-negotiable)

The main text must be fully understandable and convincing on its own. The Supporting Information supports the paper; it must never be load-bearing for the central advance. A reader who never opens the SI should still grasp the material, the decisive evidence that it is what you claim, the property, and the benchmarked function.

  • The central advance, the decisive characterization, and the headline benchmarked metric live in the main text.
  • The SI holds the exhaustive backup a skeptical referee or a group trying to reproduce the work will want.
  • Every SI item is cited from the main text at the point it becomes relevant.

If removing the SI collapses the argument, the partition is wrong — pull the essential piece back into the main text (and trim elsewhere via advmat-length-management).

What belongs in Supporting Information

ContentHome
Full synthesis recipes, optimization sweepsSI
Extended characterization (more samples, techniques)SI
Full device fabrication protocols, control devicesSI
Complete benchmarking table with all referencesSI
Per-sample statistics, histograms, batch dataSI
Additional figures, movies, large data tablesSI
DFT/computational details, input filesSI
The central advance and its decisive evidenceMain text
The property mechanism linking structure to functionMain text
The headline benchmarked metric with n and spreadMain text

SI organization

  • Mirror the main text's logic: order SI sections to match the order they are cited.
  • Give SI sections clear headings and self-contained captions; label SI figures/tables distinctly (Figure S1, Table S1).
  • Include an SI Experimental Section detailed enough to reproduce the material if the main-text version is condensed.
  • Keep the SI honest: it is peer-reviewed alongside the paper — not a place to bury weak or contradictory data.
  • Provide computational and raw-data availability per current Wiley policy (repository + DOI where required).

Checklist

  • The main text is convincing without ever opening the SI
  • No decisive evidence for the advance lives only in the SI
  • Every SI item is cited from the main text at the relevant point
  • SI sections ordered to match their citation order
  • SI figures/tables labeled S1, S2, ... distinctly from main-text items
  • The full reproducible recipe/protocol is in the SI if condensed in the body
  • Nomenclature and units are consistent between main text and SI
  • Data/computational availability handled per current Wiley policy

Anti-patterns

  • A paper that silently depends on the SI to be believed
  • Burying the decisive characterization or the benchmarking in the SI
  • An SI that is a disorganized data dump rather than a structured appendix
  • SI figures referenced out of order or never cited from the body
  • Nomenclature/unit drift between main text and SI
  • Using the SI to smuggle in claims the referees did not scrutinize

Output format

【Main text stands alone】yes / fix (pull back: ...)
【SI sections】S1: ... / S2: ... (cited from body?)
【Decisive evidence only in SI?】none / move back: ...
【SI figure/table labels】S-prefixed?  yes / fix
【Reproducible recipe present】yes / fix
【Nomenclature consistent body↔SI】yes / fix
【Next】advmat-writing-style or advmat-length-management

SI scope, file formats, and data-deposition rules are set by Wiley and evolve — verify on the official Advanced Materials author page.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する