本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

advmat-workflow

Use when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Advanced Materials Workflow (advmat-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It does not do the work of any specialized skill; it names which advmat- skill fits your current stage* and hands off.

Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) — Wiley-VCH's flagship materials-science journal. The defining bar is a genuine materials-science advance (a new material, mechanism, or property — not an incremental improvement) that is rigorously characterized by multiple complementary techniques, ideally carried through to a device-level demonstration benchmarked against the state of the art, and communicated with cover-quality figures. If the work is solid but incremental or narrowly functional, its home is more likely Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, or Advanced Materials Interfaces, and advmat-scope-fit will say so.

When to trigger

  • User asks "what should I do next?" on a materials manuscript
  • User drops a draft and needs the current bottleneck diagnosed
  • User is unsure whether the result is "Adv. Mater.-worthy" or belongs in a sibling Advanced-portfolio journal
  • The manuscript is over the Communication/Article length format and content must be re-partitioned
  • User received a Wiley reviewer report and needs to switch into response mode

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Unsure if the advance is novel / broad enough for Adv. Mater.advmat-scope-fit
Result is real but the "why this is an advance" is unclearadvmat-results-framing
Characterization is thin, or the experimental section sprawlsadvmat-methods
Figures are dense; no cover-quality lead figure or TOC graphicadvmat-figures
Manuscript leans on the SI; reader can't follow without itadvmat-supplementary
Prose is wordy, hedged, or not Wiley house styleadvmat-writing-style
Over the Communication (~4 pp) or Article (~10 pp) format budgetadvmat-length-management
Need a cover letter that argues advance + broad impactadvmat-cover-letter
Ready to submit; need format / file / metadata preflightadvmat-submission
Choosing suggested/opposed referees; anticipating objectionsadvmat-referee-strategy
Received a reviewer report or editor decision; need to respondadvmat-revision

Default order

  1. advmat-scope-fit — settle the advance + broad-impact gate first; redirect to a sibling journal if it fails
  2. advmat-results-framing — lock the single central advance and its significance
  3. advmat-methods — make the multi-technique characterization airtight; full experimental detail to the SI
  4. advmat-figures — design the lead figure and the TOC graphic to convey the advance at a glance
  5. advmat-supplementary — partition extended data / methods into Supporting Information; the paper must stand alone
  6. advmat-writing-style — Wiley house style, concision, defined nomenclature and units
  7. advmat-length-management — fit the Communication or Article format (display items and words counted together)
  8. advmat-cover-letter — argue the advance + broad-impact case to the editors
  9. advmat-submission — final preflight (format, files, article type, ORCID, TOC graphic)
  10. advmat-referee-strategy — suggested / opposed referees; pre-empt the characterization / benchmarking objections
  11. advmat-revision — after the reviewer reports arrive

advmat-writing-style and advmat-length-management are late polish stages. Do not trim to the page format before the central advance, characterization, and figures are stable, or you will cut load-bearing evidence.

Decision heuristics

  • "Reviewer 2 will ask 'why not Adv. Funct. Mater.?'" → advmat-scope-fit
  • "I can state the material but not why it is a genuine advance" → advmat-results-framing
  • "A referee will say the phase assignment isn't proven" → advmat-methods
  • "My lead figure has ten panels and no single takeaway" → advmat-figures
  • "You can't judge the material without reading the SI" → advmat-supplementary
  • "I'm over the page limit and every figure is huge" → advmat-length-management
  • "The editor needs to be told why this matters beyond my subfield" → advmat-cover-letter
  • "Submitting tonight" → advmat-submission
  • "Who should I suggest as a referee?" → advmat-referee-strategy
  • "Three reviewer reports just landed" → advmat-revision

Manuscript status board

Readiness is a two-column question: is the science settled, and does it fit the format? Fill this board before invoking advmat-submission; any cell still marked OPEN routes you back to the named skill.

ADV. MATER. STATUS BOARD                  verdict   owner skill
========================================  ========  =====================
GATE  materials advance + broad impact    OPEN      advmat-scope-fit
      (fails → retarget AFM / Adv.Sci.)
ADVANCE one central new material /        OPEN      advmat-results-framing
      mechanism / property, stated plainly
CHAR  multi-technique characterization     OPEN      advmat-methods
      proves structure→property claim
FIG   lead figure + TOC graphic =          OPEN      advmat-figures
      the advance at a glance
SI    paper stands alone; SI holds         OPEN      advmat-supplementary
      extended data / full experimental
STYLE Wiley house style, units defined     OPEN      advmat-writing-style
FIT   inside Communication / Article        OPEN      advmat-length-management
      format (display items counted)
CASE  cover letter argues advance+impact    OPEN      advmat-cover-letter
REFS  suggested / opposed referees named    OPEN      advmat-referee-strategy
----------------------------------------  --------  ---------------------
all rows CLOSED → advmat-submission preflight → submit
reviewer report arrives → advmat-revision

Differences vs. sibling Advanced-portfolio journals

Advanced Materials shares Wiley-VCH production and rigor standards with Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, and Advanced Materials Interfaces, but differs on the gate:

  • Adv. Mater.: a broadly significant materials advance — a new material, mechanism, or property that reshapes how a field thinks. Incremental optimization is declined on impact grounds even when flawless.
  • AFM / Small / Adv. Sci. / AMI: excellent, rigorous, but appropriately specialist or incremental work with a well-defined audience.

If advmat-scope-fit returns a "specialist / incremental" verdict, retarget rather than fighting the impact gate.

Anti-patterns

  • Do not skip advmat-scope-fit — editors triage on advance/impact first; a wrong-venue paper burns a submission cycle
  • Do not run advmat-length-management before the science is stable — you will cut characterization the referees need
  • Do not let the Supporting Information become the place where the real evidence hides
  • Do not draft advmat-revision responses before you have actually changed the manuscript and added the requested data

Durable norms only. Verify current word/page limits, article types, formats, and policies on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する