Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which advmat-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from scope-fit through revision for an Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) manuscript. Routes — does not replace — the specialized skills.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This is the router. It does not do the work of any specialized skill; it names which advmat- skill fits your current stage* and hands off.
Default assumption: unless told otherwise, the target is Advanced Materials (Adv. Mater.) — Wiley-VCH's flagship materials-science journal. The defining bar is a genuine materials-science advance (a new material, mechanism, or property — not an incremental improvement) that is rigorously characterized by multiple complementary techniques, ideally carried through to a device-level demonstration benchmarked against the state of the art, and communicated with cover-quality figures. If the work is solid but incremental or narrowly functional, its home is more likely Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, or Advanced Materials Interfaces, and advmat-scope-fit will say so.
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure if the advance is novel / broad enough for Adv. Mater. | advmat-scope-fit |
| Result is real but the "why this is an advance" is unclear | advmat-results-framing |
| Characterization is thin, or the experimental section sprawls | advmat-methods |
| Figures are dense; no cover-quality lead figure or TOC graphic | advmat-figures |
| Manuscript leans on the SI; reader can't follow without it | advmat-supplementary |
| Prose is wordy, hedged, or not Wiley house style | advmat-writing-style |
| Over the Communication (~4 pp) or Article (~10 pp) format budget | advmat-length-management |
| Need a cover letter that argues advance + broad impact | advmat-cover-letter |
| Ready to submit; need format / file / metadata preflight | advmat-submission |
| Choosing suggested/opposed referees; anticipating objections | advmat-referee-strategy |
| Received a reviewer report or editor decision; need to respond | advmat-revision |
advmat-scope-fit — settle the advance + broad-impact gate first; redirect to a sibling journal if it failsadvmat-results-framing — lock the single central advance and its significanceadvmat-methods — make the multi-technique characterization airtight; full experimental detail to the SIadvmat-figures — design the lead figure and the TOC graphic to convey the advance at a glanceadvmat-supplementary — partition extended data / methods into Supporting Information; the paper must stand aloneadvmat-writing-style — Wiley house style, concision, defined nomenclature and unitsadvmat-length-management — fit the Communication or Article format (display items and words counted together)advmat-cover-letter — argue the advance + broad-impact case to the editorsadvmat-submission — final preflight (format, files, article type, ORCID, TOC graphic)advmat-referee-strategy — suggested / opposed referees; pre-empt the characterization / benchmarking objectionsadvmat-revision — after the reviewer reports arrive
advmat-writing-styleandadvmat-length-managementare late polish stages. Do not trim to the page format before the central advance, characterization, and figures are stable, or you will cut load-bearing evidence.
advmat-scope-fitadvmat-results-framingadvmat-methodsadvmat-figuresadvmat-supplementaryadvmat-length-managementadvmat-cover-letteradvmat-submissionadvmat-referee-strategyadvmat-revisionReadiness is a two-column question: is the science settled, and does it fit the format? Fill this board before invoking advmat-submission; any cell still marked OPEN routes you back to the named skill.
ADV. MATER. STATUS BOARD verdict owner skill
======================================== ======== =====================
GATE materials advance + broad impact OPEN advmat-scope-fit
(fails → retarget AFM / Adv.Sci.)
ADVANCE one central new material / OPEN advmat-results-framing
mechanism / property, stated plainly
CHAR multi-technique characterization OPEN advmat-methods
proves structure→property claim
FIG lead figure + TOC graphic = OPEN advmat-figures
the advance at a glance
SI paper stands alone; SI holds OPEN advmat-supplementary
extended data / full experimental
STYLE Wiley house style, units defined OPEN advmat-writing-style
FIT inside Communication / Article OPEN advmat-length-management
format (display items counted)
CASE cover letter argues advance+impact OPEN advmat-cover-letter
REFS suggested / opposed referees named OPEN advmat-referee-strategy
---------------------------------------- -------- ---------------------
all rows CLOSED → advmat-submission preflight → submit
reviewer report arrives → advmat-revision
Advanced Materials shares Wiley-VCH production and rigor standards with Advanced Functional Materials, Advanced Science, Small, and Advanced Materials Interfaces, but differs on the gate:
If advmat-scope-fit returns a "specialist / incremental" verdict, retarget rather than fighting the impact gate.
advmat-scope-fit — editors triage on advance/impact first; a wrong-venue paper burns a submission cycleadvmat-length-management before the science is stable — you will cut characterization the referees needadvmat-revision responses before you have actually changed the manuscript and added the requested dataDurable norms only. Verify current word/page limits, article types, formats, and policies on the official Wiley Advanced Materials author page.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。