Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when deciding which aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This is the router. It tells you which aejmic- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for microeconomic THEORY and its applications: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is theory-first — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.
Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process (vs. specialist JET / GEB / Theoretical Economics); it is less abstract/methodological than TE or Econometrica; and it is theory, not empirical applied micro (that is AEJ: Applied). Process tells: single-blind review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a submission fee (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see resources/official-source-map.md).
| Current symptom | Next skill |
|---|---|
| Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied) | aejmic-topic-selection |
| Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversold | aejmic-literature-positioning |
| The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneck | aejmic-theory-model |
| Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the work | aejmic-identification |
| Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missing | aejmic-robustness |
| Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messy | aejmic-tables-figures |
| Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not land | aejmic-writing-style |
| Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, README | aejmic-replication-package |
| Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject odds | aejmic-referee-strategy |
| Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflight | aejmic-submission |
| Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategy | aejmic-rebuttal |
aejmic-topic-selection — lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory questionaejmic-literature-positioning — stake the result against the closest theoremaejmic-theory-model — the central skill: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategyaejmic-identification — what makes the result tight / what identifies parametersaejmic-robustness — extensions, edge cases, applied robustnessaejmic-tables-figures — propositions, numerical examples, experimental tablesaejmic-writing-style — make the result land (abstract + intro last)aejmic-replication-package — proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)aejmic-referee-strategy — pre-empt the objections theory referees raiseaejmic-submission — AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)aejmic-rebuttal — after the R&R
aejmic-writing-styleis a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.
aejmic-theory-model must settle firstAEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.
| Archetype | Likely first bottleneck | Enter at |
|---|---|---|
| pure theory (mechanism/game/decision) | equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generality | aejmic-theory-model |
| theory with structural estimation | parameter identification + counterfactual validity | aejmic-identification → aejmic-theory-model |
| theory-grounded experiment | design maps to the model's prediction; pre-registration | aejmic-topic-selection → aejmic-identification |
| IO theory / applied micro-theory | the mechanism's robustness to modeling choices | aejmic-theory-model → aejmic-robustness |
A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — which assumption is doing the work (owned by aejmic-identification) and does the mechanism extend (owned by aejmic-robustness), both anchored to aejmic-theory-model. Route to aejmic-theory-model to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then aejmic-robustness for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to aejmic-tables-figures and aejmic-rebuttal.
if decision_letter_arrived: -> aejmic-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit: -> aejmic-submission
elif anticipating_referees: -> aejmic-referee-strategy
elif proof_appendix_or_code: -> aejmic-replication-package
elif prose_or_intro: -> aejmic-writing-style
elif exhibits_or_examples: -> aejmic-tables-figures
elif extensions_or_edge_cases: -> aejmic-robustness
elif which_assumption_or_id: -> aejmic-identification
elif model_or_proof_unsettled: -> aejmic-theory-model
elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy: -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning
else: -> aejmic-topic-selection
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。