本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

aejmic-workflow

Use when deciding which aejmic-* sub-skill to invoke next, or when sequencing manuscript work from topic selection through rebuttal for an American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) submission. Routes — it does not replace — the specialized skills.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

AEJ: Micro Workflow Router (aejmic-workflow)

Overview

This is the router. It tells you which aejmic- skill to use at the current stage* of a manuscript aimed at the American Economic Journal: Microeconomics (AEJ: Micro) — the American Economic Association's quarterly journal (founded 2009, one of four AEJs) for microeconomic THEORY and its applications: game theory, mechanism and market design, industrial-organization theory, contract theory, information economics, decision theory, behavioral theory, and theory-grounded experiments. AEJ: Micro is theory-first — it rewards a clean, general, well-motivated result, with structural/experimental applications welcome when the economics is the point.

Default assumption: unless the user says otherwise, treat the target as AEJ: Micro. Operational tells that you are at AEJ: Micro and not a sibling: it wants broad micro interest + the AEA editorial process (vs. specialist JET / GEB / Theoretical Economics); it is less abstract/methodological than TE or Econometrica; and it is theory, not empirical applied micro (that is AEJ: Applied). Process tells: single-blind review via the AEA submission system (author revealed to referees; referees anonymous), a submission fee (AEA member rate — volatile), JEL classification per AEA practice, and the AEA Data and Code Availability Policy for any paper with data, code, experiments, or numerical results. Re-verify volatile specifics on the official AEA pages (see resources/official-source-map.md).

When to trigger

  • The user asks "what should I do next?"
  • A draft needs its current bottleneck diagnosed
  • Work is ping-ponging between the model, the proofs, the framing, and the response letter
  • An AEJ: Micro decision letter arrived and the user needs to switch into revision mode

Routing table

Current symptomNext skill
Unsure the question is broad-micro-interesting theory (not JET/TE/AEJ:Applied)aejmic-topic-selection
Contribution vs. the closest existing result is fuzzy or oversoldaejmic-literature-positioning
The model, equilibrium concept, or proof architecture is the bottleneckaejmic-theory-model
Unclear what makes the result tight / which assumption is doing the workaejmic-identification
Extensions, edge cases, or (applied) robustness checks are missingaejmic-robustness
Propositions, numerical examples, or experimental exhibits are messyaejmic-tables-figures
Prose buries the result; abstract/intro do not landaejmic-writing-style
Proof appendix, numerical/structural/experimental code deposit, READMEaejmic-replication-package
Want to anticipate referee objections / calibrate desk-reject oddsaejmic-referee-strategy
Ready to submit via the AEA system; need a preflightaejmic-submission
Received an R&R; need a response-letter strategyaejmic-rebuttal

Default order

  1. aejmic-topic-selection — lock a broad-interest microeconomic-theory question
  2. aejmic-literature-positioning — stake the result against the closest theorem
  3. aejmic-theory-model — the central skill: model, equilibrium concept, proof strategy
  4. aejmic-identification — what makes the result tight / what identifies parameters
  5. aejmic-robustness — extensions, edge cases, applied robustness
  6. aejmic-tables-figures — propositions, numerical examples, experimental tables
  7. aejmic-writing-style — make the result land (abstract + intro last)
  8. aejmic-replication-package — proof appendix + code (AEA Data Editor)
  9. aejmic-referee-strategy — pre-empt the objections theory referees raise
  10. aejmic-submission — AEA system preflight (single-blind, JEL, fee)
  11. aejmic-rebuttal — after the R&R

aejmic-writing-style is a late-stage polish; do not rewrite the intro before the model and proofs settle.

Anti-patterns

  • Polishing prose or exhibits while the model or main proof is still moving — aejmic-theory-model must settle first
  • Treating AEJ: Micro like JET/GEB (specialist, maximal generality) or AEJ: Applied (empirical) — wrong fit gate
  • Deferring the proof appendix and any numerical/experimental code until acceptance — the AEA Data Editor checks before publication
  • Reporting an applied result with significance asterisks instead of standard errors

Routing by paper archetype

AEJ: Micro spans several branches; the bottleneck differs. Read the archetype, then enter the chain at the right link.

ArchetypeLikely first bottleneckEnter at
pure theory (mechanism/game/decision)equilibrium concept + proof strategy + generalityaejmic-theory-model
theory with structural estimationparameter identification + counterfactual validityaejmic-identification → aejmic-theory-model
theory-grounded experimentdesign maps to the model's prediction; pre-registrationaejmic-topic-selection → aejmic-identification
IO theory / applied micro-theorythe mechanism's robustness to modeling choicesaejmic-theory-model → aejmic-robustness

Worked routing example (illustrative)

A user says: "My mechanism-design result is proved, but a referee says it hinges on a knife-edge tie-breaking assumption and asks whether it survives a continuum of types." That is two distinct AEJ: Micro pushbacks — which assumption is doing the work (owned by aejmic-identification) and does the mechanism extend (owned by aejmic-robustness), both anchored to aejmic-theory-model. Route to aejmic-theory-model to restate the proof under the relaxed assumption, then aejmic-robustness for the continuum extension; only once the proposition is stable do you return to aejmic-tables-figures and aejmic-rebuttal.

Minimal decision snippet

if decision_letter_arrived:          -> aejmic-rebuttal
elif ready_to_submit:                -> aejmic-submission
elif anticipating_referees:          -> aejmic-referee-strategy
elif proof_appendix_or_code:         -> aejmic-replication-package
elif prose_or_intro:                 -> aejmic-writing-style
elif exhibits_or_examples:           -> aejmic-tables-figures
elif extensions_or_edge_cases:       -> aejmic-robustness
elif which_assumption_or_id:         -> aejmic-identification
elif model_or_proof_unsettled:       -> aejmic-theory-model
elif fit_or_positioning_fuzzy:       -> aejmic-topic-selection / aejmic-literature-positioning
else:                                -> aejmic-topic-selection

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する