本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

amann-submission

Use when running the final pre-submission preflight for an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) proposal or invited full review via the Manuscript Central portal — proposal-vs-invited-review route, deadlines, formatting, CV, and anonymity. Final checks; it does not draft content.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(3)

  • SKILL.md4.6 KB
  • templates/checklist.md851 B
  • templates/manuscript_template.md1007 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Submission Preflight (amann-submission)

When to trigger

  • A deadline is near — last check before uploading a proposal to Manuscript Central
  • A proposal was accepted and you are submitting the invited full review
  • Confirming format, CV, and anonymity requirements for the right route
  • Unsure which files the portal expects for a proposal vs. a full review

Process facts (检索于 2026-06;以官网为准 — re-confirm on the AOM/Annals pages)

  • Publisher / venue. Annals is the Academy of Management's review-of-the-field journal, published with Taylor & Francis. It is distinct from AMR (original theory) and AMJ (empirical). Submission is via Manuscript Central: https://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/aomannals.
  • Two routes, in order. (1) Proposal — the mandatory gate: ≤5 pages, single-spaced, 1-inch margins, 12pt, with the four headings (Focus of the review / Related reviews / Review scope and process / New insights); references and visuals do not count. (2) Invited full review — submitted only after a proposal is accepted; typically ~50 pages of text plus tables/figures/refs.
  • Deadlines. Proposals are on a twice-yearly cycle — April 1 and October 1; not reviewed until the deadline passes; decisions ~6 weeks after the deadline. Two issues publish per year (January and July).
  • Anonymity. Proposals are double-blind (reviewed by the Associate Editors) — anonymize the proposal. The invited full review forgoes double-blind (read by the Associate Editor and Editor), so anonymity requirements differ between the two routes — confirm current rules on the portal.
  • CV. A current CV may be required for the editors' eyes only (not seen by reviewers) — confirm at submission (待核实).
  • Style / format. Follow the current Annals/Taylor & Francis author guidelines for manuscript format and references (house style 待核实 — confirm APA vs. other on the live page). Length, abstract, and exact formatting specifics are volatile.
  • Fees / APC. Any submission fee or APC is volatile — re-confirm on the official pages; do not assert an amount.

Preflight checklist

Route & files

  • Route chosen: proposal (≤5pp, four headings) or invited full review (after acceptance)
  • Proposal uses the four required headings verbatim and meets the ≤5pp / single-spaced / 1-in / 12pt limit
  • Targeting the correct April 1 / October 1 deadline
  • Full review (if invited) within the expected ~50-page norm; tables/figures/refs prepared

Front matter

  • Title, abstract (review-style — contribution to the field), and keywords present
  • Author affiliations complete; CV prepared if required (editors-only)

Anonymity & declarations

  • Proposal anonymized for double-blind review (proposal route)
  • Full-review anonymity handled per current rules (it forgoes double-blind)
  • Confirmed not under review elsewhere; AI not listed as an author

Volatile re-confirms

  • Portal specifics, fee/APC, CV requirement, house style, anonymity — re-checked on AOM/Annals pages (检索于 2026-06)

Anti-patterns

  • Uploading a full review without an accepted proposal — out of process at Annals
  • A proposal that exceeds 5 pages or omits one of the four required headings
  • Missing the April 1 / October 1 window because intake was assumed to be rolling
  • Asserting a fee/APC or editor name from memory rather than the live page
  • Failing to anonymize the proposal (it is double-blind) or mishandling the full-review anonymity difference
  • A primary-paper abstract on a review submission

Output format

【Route】proposal (≤5pp, 4 headings) / invited full review (~50pp)
【Deadline】targeting April 1 / October 1? <which>
【Proposal headings】Focus / Related reviews / Scope & process / New insights present? Y/N
【Anonymity】proposal anonymized (double-blind); full-review rule confirmed? Y/N
【CV】prepared if required (editors-only)? Y/N
【Volatile re-confirms】portal / fee / style / anonymity checked on AOM page? Y/N
【Next step】submit via Manuscript Central → amann-review-process for what to expect

Supplementary resources

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する