本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ccs-camera-ready

Use when preparing an accepted ACM CCS paper for the ACM Digital Library proceedings, covering de-anonymization, the ACM sigconf final format, ACM rights and eRights forms, badge placement from artifact evaluation, incorporation of shepherd and minor-revision requirements, disclosure-timing coordination, registration, and in-person presentation.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

CCS Camera Ready

Use this after acceptance or after clearing a minor revision. Reopen the current CCS camera-ready instructions, the ACM rights form, the registration page, and the notification or shepherd email before advising authors.

Camera-ready audit

  • Convert the anonymous submission to the public proceedings version: author names, affiliations, acknowledgements, funding, and artifact links restored.
  • Apply the ACM sigconf final template and the ACM rights-management block; the DOI, the conference reference string, and the copyright notice come from the ACM eRights system.
  • Incorporate exactly what the shepherd or the minor-revision decision required, without expanding the contribution beyond what was reviewed.
  • Place any artifact-evaluation badges earned (Available, Functional, Reusable, Results Reproduced) as instructed; badge placement is part of the ACM camera-ready workflow.
  • Confirm the final title and abstract match the HotCRP-registered title and abstract if the cycle froze them at registration.
  • Coordinate disclosure timing: the public proceedings version and any released exploit or advisory should not appear before the agreed vendor-disclosure date.

Badge placement map

Badge earned in artifact evaluationWhere it goesWhat to confirm
Artifacts AvailableFirst page, with the archival DOI/URLThe archive is public and permanent before camera-ready
Artifacts Evaluated - FunctionalFirst pageThe committee's functional result is final
Artifacts Evaluated - ReusableFirst pageDocumentation matches the reusable claim
Results ReproducedFirst pageThe reproduced results match the camera-ready numbers

De-anonymization sweep

  • Restore the author block, acknowledgements, grants, and contribution statements the anonymous version stripped.
  • Rewrite third-person self-citations into natural first person where it improves clarity.
  • Replace anonymized repository placeholders with the public, licensed, archived artifact and test every link from a logged-out browser.
  • Re-check that de-anonymizing did not silently reveal an embargoed vendor before its patch.

ACM proceedings reflow

  • Switching from the submission build to the final sigconf build changes spacing; recheck every page break, protocol figure, and wide result table after adding the author block.
  • Material that fit the 12-page anonymous body can overflow once affiliations, acknowledgements, and the rights block are added; confirm the final length against the camera-ready page instruction rather than assuming.
  • Keep theorem, protocol, and section numbering identical to the reviewed version so the meta-review and shepherd record stay traceable.

Worked example: integrating a shepherd requirement

The shepherd asked that the adaptive-attack results move from the appendix into the main evaluation. Camera-ready move: promote the adaptive table into Section 6, add one sentence interpreting the degraded defense numbers honestly, and leave the full attack derivation in the appendix — without strengthening any claim the reviewers did not see.

Hedged logistics

  • Registration pricing, the exact camera-ready and rights-form deadlines, and badge-placement mechanics change every cycle; confirm against the notification email and current instructions.

Output format

[Camera-ready status] Ready / Needs fixes / Blocked
[Final package] <PDF / source / bib / ACM rights form / badges / artifacts>
[Policy checks] <format / authors / disclosure timing / registration / presentation>
[Reviewer-change map] <shepherd/revision requirement -> final edit>
[Remaining owner] <person -> task>

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when drafting an AAAI author response (rebuttal) under the single short character-limited author-feedback window, the no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-generated-review handling, and the AAAI two-phase review process where Phase-2 papers receive one feedback round before SPC/AC discussion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when designing or auditing AAAI experiments for the broad-AI program committee, including baselines, ablations, statistical significance, robustness, human evaluation, AI-for-Social-Impact and alignment/safety evidence, compute and cost reporting, and reproducibility-checklist alignment for Phase-1 survival.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when positioning an AAAI paper's novelty against archival work, contemporaneous arXiv or workshop papers, and AAAI/IJCAI/NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR neighbors across the broad AI scope, while staying inside AAAI's dual-submission and AI-as-source policy constraints and writing a related-work section legible to non-specialist reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist (placed after references), experimental traceability, seed and hyperparameter reporting, compute and cost disclosure, dataset access and licensing, code/data ZIP readiness, and the claim-to-evidence map that Phase-1 reviewers use to judge rigor across AAAI's broad AI scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

brycewang-stanford/Awesome-Journal-Skills1,2482026年9月27日 更新

brycewang-stanford のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する