本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

calculating-fund-performance-metrics

Computes fund performance with gross/net IRR, MOIC, DPI, RVPI, TVPI, PME, and direct alpha methodologies. Use when calculating fund performance, reconciling return metrics, or benchmarking against peer groups.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Calculating Fund Performance Metrics

When To Use

  • Preparing quarterly or annual LP performance reports requiring IRR, MOIC, and multiple-based metrics
  • Reconciling gross vs. net return figures across portfolio companies or fund segments
  • Benchmarking fund returns against public market equivalents (PME) or peer group composites
  • Responding to LP due diligence requests that require auditable performance calculations
  • Validating administrator-produced performance figures before distribution

Inputs To Gather

  • Cash flow schedule: Date-stamped capital calls (drawdowns) and distributions for each LP and the fund overall, including recallable distributions if applicable
  • NAV / residual values: Most recent fair market value of unrealized holdings, broken out by portfolio company; confirm valuation date and methodology (ASC 820 / IPEV guidelines) [VERIFY]
  • Fee and carry structure: Management fee rate, fee basis (committed vs. invested capital), catch-up percentage, carried interest rate, preferred return / hurdle rate, GP clawback terms
  • Benchmark index data: Total-return index series (e.g., S&P 500 TR, Russell 2000 TR, MSCI World) aligned to fund cash flow dates for PME and direct alpha calculations
  • Fund terms: Vintage year, commitment period end date, fund term, any recycling provisions that affect DPI/RVPI interpretation
  • FX rates (if multi-currency): Spot rates at each cash flow date and reporting date

Workflow

  1. Validate the cash flow ledger

    • Confirm every capital call and distribution has a settlement date (not just call/notice date)
    • Reconcile total called capital against the capital account statement
    • Flag any netting of calls against distributions on the same date — separate them for IRR accuracy
  2. Calculate gross return metrics (deal-level)

    • Gross IRR: XIRR across deal-level cash flows (cost basis in, proceeds + remaining FMV out). Use actual dates; do not approximate with quarterly periods
    • Gross MOIC: (Realized proceeds + Unrealized FMV) / Total invested cost
    • If partial realizations exist, split realized vs. unrealized MOIC components
  3. Calculate net return metrics (fund-level)

    • Build a net cash flow series: LP contributions (capital calls including fees) as outflows, LP distributions as inflows, ending NAV (net of accrued carry and expenses) as terminal inflow
    • Net IRR: XIRR on the net LP cash flow series
    • Net MOIC: (Cumulative distributions + Net NAV) / Cumulative contributions
    • DPI (Distributions to Paid-In): Cumulative distributions / Cumulative contributions
    • RVPI (Residual Value to Paid-In): Net NAV / Cumulative contributions
    • TVPI (Total Value to Paid-In): DPI + RVPI (cross-check: must equal Net MOIC)
  4. Compute public market equivalent (PME) metrics

    • Kaplan-Schoar PME (KS-PME): Compound each fund cash flow at the benchmark index return to the reporting date. KS-PME = FV of distributions / FV of contributions. Value > 1.0 indicates outperformance
    • Direct Alpha: Discount/compound all fund cash flows at benchmark returns; compute IRR on the residual series. The resulting rate is the annualized excess return over the index
    • PME+ (Long-Nickels): Scale distributions by a factor λ so that the NAV of the hypothetical public investment equals the fund's residual NAV; compute IRR on the scaled series [VERIFY methodology variant if LP has a preferred convention]
  5. Perform reasonableness and cross-checks

    • TVPI must equal DPI + RVPI within rounding tolerance
    • Net IRR must be lower than gross IRR (if not, investigate fee/carry application)
    • For mature funds (>75% DPI), RVPI should be a small fraction of TVPI
    • Compare IRR to MOIC-implied return for the holding period — large divergence signals cash flow timing issues or J-curve distortion
    • Confirm KS-PME and direct alpha directionally agree on outperformance/underperformance
  6. Present results

    • Organize into a calculation worksheet with clearly labeled sections: Gross Metrics, Net Metrics, PME/Benchmark Metrics
    • State the as-of date, benchmark index used, and NAV valuation date
    • Footnote any assumptions (e.g., "distributions assumed reinvested at index return for PME")

Output

A structured calculation worksheet containing:

  • Gross metrics table: Gross IRR, Gross MOIC (total / realized / unrealized) per deal and aggregate
  • Net metrics table: Net IRR, Net MOIC, DPI, RVPI, TVPI at fund level (and by vintage or strategy segment if requested)
  • PME summary: KS-PME ratio, direct alpha (annualized), benchmark used, observation period
  • Methodology notes: IRR solver used (XIRR convention), valuation basis for unrealized, fee/carry netting approach
  • Reconciliation checks: TVPI = DPI + RVPI confirmation, gross-to-net bridge summary

Quality Checks

  • IRR calculations use exact dates (XIRR), not period-approximated IRR, to avoid distortion from uneven cash flow timing
  • Management fees are applied on the correct basis (committed capital during commitment period, invested capital thereafter) [VERIFY against LPA terms]
  • Carried interest is computed net of preferred return and catch-up, consistent with the fund's distribution waterfall [VERIFY waterfall structure — American vs. European]
  • PME index series is total-return (dividends reinvested), not price-only
  • All metrics use the same as-of / valuation date — mixing dates across metrics invalidates comparisons
  • If fund recycles distributions, DPI and TVPI may exceed typical ranges; note recycling impact explicitly
  • Mark any input sourced from preliminary or unaudited financials with [VERIFY]

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

CaseMark のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する