本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

conducting-liquidity-and-viability-analysis

Assesses going-concern viability with 13-week cash flow models, liquidity runway, and critical vendor analysis. Use when evaluating liquidity crises, building 13-week models, or assessing near-term solvency.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.0 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Conducting Liquidity And Viability Analysis

When To Use

  • Building or reviewing a 13-week cash flow (TWCF) model for a distressed company
  • Evaluating whether a business can fund operations through a restructuring timeline
  • Assessing liquidity runway to determine filing urgency or need for DIP financing
  • Identifying critical vendors whose non-payment would trigger operational shutdown
  • Supporting going-concern opinions, lender negotiations, or board-level solvency decisions

Inputs To Gather

  • Bank statements and cash ledger — trailing 13 weeks minimum; 26 weeks preferred for seasonality
  • A/R aging schedule — with collection history and concentration by customer
  • A/P aging schedule — including past-due balances and vendor payment terms
  • Revolver/ABL borrowing base certificate — current availability, reserves, and eligibility criteria
  • Debt service schedule — principal, interest, fees, and covenant compliance dates
  • Payroll registers — by pay period, including taxes, benefits, and contractor payments
  • Capital expenditure commitments — contractual and discretionary, with deferral feasibility
  • Intercompany funding flows — if multi-entity, map cash pooling and restricted subsidiaries
  • Material contracts list — leases, supply agreements, and any minimum purchase obligations

Workflow

  1. Establish the cash baseline

    • Reconcile opening cash across all accounts (operating, restricted, escrow)
    • Identify trapped cash in foreign subsidiaries or restricted accounts
    • Confirm revolver availability net of reserves, letters of credit, and borrowing base limits
  2. Build the 13-week cash flow model

    • Use a direct-method (receipts and disbursements) format — not indirect/accrual
    • Week 1–2: populate from known scheduled payments and confirmed receivables
    • Weeks 3–6: use rolling historical conversion rates for A/R and A/P
    • Weeks 7–13: apply trend-based or management-forecast assumptions with clear labels
    • Segregate operating cash flow from restructuring-related professional fees and costs
    • Model revolver draws/repayments dynamically based on weekly net cash position
  3. Stress-test and scenario the model

    • Base case: management forecast with historical adjustment
    • Downside case: 10–20% revenue haircut, accelerated payables, delayed collections
    • Liquidity crisis case: loss of top customer or key supplier, revolver freeze
    • Identify the week where each scenario breaches minimum cash or triggers covenant default
  4. Perform critical vendor analysis

    • Classify vendors into tiers: (1) sole-source/operational necessity, (2) important but substitutable, (3) discretionary
    • For Tier 1 vendors, assess: lead time for alternatives, contractual cure periods, lien exposure
    • Estimate the cost of vendor defection (production stoppage, lost revenue, substitute pricing)
    • Flag vendors with cross-default or setoff rights against receivables
  5. Assess going-concern viability

    • Calculate liquidity runway in weeks under each scenario
    • Determine if the company can fund: (a) ordinary operations, (b) restructuring costs, (c) adequate protection payments simultaneously
    • Evaluate whether a consensual out-of-court process is feasible or if a filing is required to access DIP financing, the automatic stay, or Section 363 sale process [VERIFY — jurisdiction-specific filing considerations and local rules]
    • Identify specific triggers that would move the timeline forward (e.g., vendor acceleration, lender sweep, covenant breach date)
  6. Document assumptions and sensitivities

    • Create an assumptions page listing every conversion rate, growth factor, and timing assumption
    • Flag which assumptions have the highest cash impact if wrong (tornado chart or sensitivity table)
    • Note all data gaps and their estimated materiality

Output

  • 13-Week Cash Flow Model — weekly receipts and disbursements with beginning/ending cash, revolver balance, and minimum liquidity line
  • Scenario Summary Table — side-by-side comparison of base, downside, and crisis cases showing the week liquidity is exhausted
  • Critical Vendor Matrix — tiered vendor list with sole-source flags, estimated switching cost, and recommended payment priority
  • Liquidity Runway Assessment — narrative memo stating weeks of runway under each scenario, key triggers, and recommended next steps (e.g., engage DIP lenders, prepare first-day motions, negotiate forbearance)
  • Assumptions and Sensitivity Log — tabular list of all model inputs with source, confidence level, and cash impact range

Quality Checks

  • Confirm the TWCF beginning cash ties to the most recent bank statement — zero tolerance for unexplained variances
  • Verify that total 13-week disbursements are cross-checked against trailing actuals (±10% variance requires explanation)
  • Ensure revolver mechanics reflect actual credit agreement terms (borrowing base formula, reserves, dominion triggers) [VERIFY — confirm against executed credit agreement]
  • Validate that critical vendor tier assignments have been reviewed against supply chain and operations teams — not solely from financial data
  • Check that the downside scenario assumptions are genuinely adverse, not a marginal trim of the base case
  • Confirm professional fee estimates reflect actual engagement letters and anticipated restructuring scope
  • Flag any week where minimum operating cash falls below a two-week payroll coverage threshold

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

CaseMark のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する