本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

conducting-reg-ab-compliance

Structures Regulation AB II compliance with asset-level data requirements, servicer reporting, and shelf registration eligibility. Use when ensuring Reg AB compliance, preparing ABS reporting, or structuring shelf eligibility.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.4 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Conducting Reg Ab Compliance

Structures Regulation AB II compliance with asset-level data requirements, servicer reporting, and shelf registration eligibility.

When To Use

  • Preparing or reviewing asset-level data filings on EDGAR (Form ABS-EE)
  • Evaluating shelf registration eligibility under Rule 415 for ABS offerings
  • Structuring servicer reporting obligations and compliance certifications
  • Conducting pre-offering diligence on Reg AB II data field completeness
  • Reviewing ongoing periodic reporting (Form 10-D, Form 10-K) for ABS issuers
  • Assessing whether a new asset class or pool structure triggers additional Reg AB requirements

Inputs To Gather

  • Asset class designation — RMBS, CMBS, CLO, auto ABS, credit card ABS, equipment ABS, etc., as each triggers a distinct Schedule AL field set [VERIFY: confirm applicable Schedule AL for the specific asset class]
  • Shelf registration statement (Form SF-3) and any pending amendments
  • Prospectus and prospectus supplement with waterfall descriptions and pool-level data
  • Servicer compliance certifications (annual and event-driven)
  • Historical Form ABS-EE filings for the issuing entity, if any
  • Transaction agreements — PSA, servicing agreement, indenture, administration agreement
  • Third-party due diligence reports (Rule 15Ga-2 findings letters)
  • CEO certification of disclosure under Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d)

Workflow

1. Determine Shelf Eligibility (Form SF-3)

  • Confirm the depositor has filed all required Exchange Act reports for at least 12 months [VERIFY: check for any SEC no-action relief modifying this timeline]
  • Verify that prior ABS offerings by the same depositor included compliant transaction-level and asset-level data
  • Confirm the depositor has not been an unregistered shell company within the preceding 12 calendar months
  • Check that the depositor satisfies the timely filing requirement — no delinquent 10-D or 10-K filings
  • Flag any prior SEC comment letters on the depositor's shelf or periodic filings that remain unresolved

2. Map Asset-Level Data Fields (Schedule AL)

  • Identify the correct Schedule AL template for the asset class (e.g., Schedule AL-1 for RMBS, Schedule AL-2 for CMBS)
  • Map each required field to the available data in the servicer's system or loan tape
  • Flag fields with missing, unavailable, or non-conforming data — document whether omission is permitted under the "not applicable" or "no data" response codes
  • For CLO/CDO structures, determine whether the SEC treats the asset class as requiring asset-level reporting or whether relief applies [VERIFY: current SEC guidance on CLO asset-level data requirements]
  • Validate XML tagging per EDGAR technical specifications for Form ABS-EE submission

3. Review Servicer Reporting Obligations

  • Confirm the servicing agreement requires delivery of a servicer compliance statement (Item 1122 of Reg AB)
  • Verify the platform servicer, master servicer, and any sub-servicers each provide a separate Item 1122 assessment
  • Check that an independent registered public accounting firm has provided an attestation report under Item 1122(b)
  • Confirm servicer event-of-default triggers align with Reg AB reporting deadlines
  • Review the servicing criteria applicable to each servicer role (cash collection, investor remittance, pool performance reporting, investor communication)

4. Validate Periodic Reporting

  • Form 10-D (distribution report): Confirm filing within 15 days after each distribution date; verify pool performance data, waterfall allocations, trigger test results, and any servicer advances are accurately disclosed
  • Form 10-K (annual report): Confirm inclusion of servicer compliance statements, attestation reports, and updated asset-level data; verify CEO certification
  • Form 8-K / Form ABS-15G: Confirm timely filing of material event notices (e.g., early amortization triggers, servicer replacements, credit enhancement draws)
  • Review third-party due diligence findings letter filings under Rule 15Ga-2 for any unresolved scope limitations

5. Assess Third-Party Due Diligence Compliance

  • Confirm that any third-party diligence provider has furnished a findings letter to the issuer and filed Form ABS-15G on EDGAR
  • Verify the prospectus discloses the scope, criteria, and findings of the third-party review
  • Check whether the diligence scope covers a statistically valid sample or the full pool, and that the methodology is disclosed

Output

  • Reg AB II Compliance Checklist — field-by-field assessment of Schedule AL completeness with gap flags
  • Shelf Eligibility Memo — confirming or identifying deficiencies in Form SF-3 eligibility criteria
  • Servicer Reporting Matrix — mapping each servicer's obligations under Items 1121/1122, with attestation status
  • Periodic Filing Tracker — status of 10-D, 10-K, 8-K, and ABS-EE filings with upcoming deadlines
  • Remediation Log — list of data gaps, non-conformances, and recommended corrective actions with responsible parties

Quality Checks

  • Every Schedule AL field must be accounted for — no silent omissions; use "N/A — field not applicable to [asset class]" or "DATA GAP — [field name] unavailable from servicer" for each missing item
  • Cross-reference waterfall descriptions in the prospectus against the distribution report (10-D) to confirm consistency
  • Verify all filing deadlines against the actual transaction calendar, not generic SEC deadlines [VERIFY: confirm any filing extensions or COVID-era relief still in effect]
  • Confirm that CEO certifications reference the correct Exchange Act rule (13a-14(d) or 15d-14(d), not the generic Sarbanes-Oxley certifications)
  • Flag any reliance on SEC no-action letters, staff guidance, or exemptive orders and confirm they remain current
  • Mark all jurisdiction- or regulation-dependent points with [VERIFY] for attorney review before filing

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

CaseMark のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する