本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

modeling-dividend-recapitalizations

Structures dividend recap analysis with leverage impact, credit agreement compliance, and return enhancement calculation. Use when modeling dividend recaps, evaluating interim distributions, or analyzing recapitalization options.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Modeling Dividend Recapitalizations

Structures dividend recap analysis with leverage impact, credit agreement compliance, and return enhancement calculation.

When To Use

  • Sponsor is considering an interim cash distribution funded by incremental debt prior to exit
  • Evaluating whether a portfolio company can support additional leverage for a dividend recap
  • Comparing a dividend recap against alternative liquidity events (partial sale, secondary, continuation fund)
  • Stress-testing credit agreement headroom before approaching lenders for recap financing
  • Quantifying IRR and MOIC enhancement from accelerating cash-on-cash returns

Inputs To Gather

  • Current capital structure: Senior debt outstanding (revolver drawn, term loan balances), subordinated/mezzanine layers, total equity invested at cost
  • Credit agreement terms: Maximum leverage ratio (Total Debt / EBITDA), secured leverage cap, fixed charge coverage minimum, restricted payments basket language, pro forma incurrence test thresholds [VERIFY against actual credit agreement]
  • Company financials: Trailing twelve-month (TTM) EBITDA, forward projections (2–3 years), capex requirements, working capital seasonality, cash on balance sheet
  • Proposed recap parameters: Target dividend amount, proposed new debt instrument (term loan B, second lien, holdco PIK), indicative pricing (spread, OID, floor), expected tenor
  • Sponsor economics: Equity check at entry, any prior distributions, current fund vintage and deployment pace, LP reporting considerations

Workflow

  1. Establish pre-recap baseline

    • Build or refresh the operating model with TTM financials and management projections
    • Calculate current leverage (Total Debt / EBITDA, Net Debt / EBITDA, Senior / EBITDA)
    • Compute current free cash flow profile and debt service coverage ratio (DSCR)
  2. Size the dividend

    • Determine maximum incremental debt capacity under credit agreement covenants
    • Apply the restricted payments basket test — identify whether the dividend falls within builder basket, general basket, or requires an incurrence-based exception [VERIFY covenant language for specific permitted payment carve-outs]
    • Deduct transaction fees (arrangement fees, legal, advisory) from gross proceeds to derive net distributable amount
    • Sense-check dividend size against market comps for similar recap transactions (typically 1.0×–2.5× incremental turns of leverage)
  3. Model pro forma capital structure

    • Layer in new debt tranche with proposed terms (rate, amortization, maturity, call protection)
    • Recalculate blended cost of debt and weighted average maturity
    • Produce pro forma leverage and coverage ratios at close and for each projected period
    • Confirm no covenant breach at closing or within the projection horizon under the base case
  4. Assess credit impact

    • Run downside scenarios: revenue decline of 10–20%, margin compression of 100–300 bps, working capital blow-out
    • Identify the EBITDA breakeven level at which covenant thresholds are breached
    • Calculate cushion percentages on each financial covenant post-recap
    • Evaluate rating agency implications if applicable (Moody's/S&P leverage thresholds for the sector) [VERIFY sector-specific rating benchmarks]
  5. Quantify return enhancement

    • Recalculate sponsor IRR and MOIC with the dividend included as an interim cash flow
    • Compare gross and net IRR/MOIC pre- and post-recap across multiple exit timing scenarios (e.g., exit in Year 3, 4, 5)
    • Compute DPI (distributions to paid-in) impact on fund-level metrics
    • Show cash-on-cash return at the time of the dividend (dividend ÷ equity invested)
  6. Sensitivity and scenario analysis

    • Build a two-way sensitivity table: dividend size vs. exit EBITDA multiple
    • Vary interest rate assumptions (fixed vs. floating, hedge cost) to stress debt service
    • Model early repayment of recap debt from excess cash flow to show deleveraging trajectory
    • Present bear/base/bull return profiles with and without the recap

Output

  • Executive summary: One-page overview of proposed recap — dividend amount, pro forma leverage, covenant headroom, and IRR/MOIC enhancement
  • Pro forma capitalization table: Pre- and post-recap side-by-side with all debt tranches, rates, maturities, and total equity value
  • Covenant compliance matrix: Each financial covenant tested at close and through the projection period with cushion percentages
  • Returns waterfall: Sponsor IRR and MOIC with and without recap, across exit timing scenarios
  • Sensitivity tables: Dividend size vs. leverage, EBITDA decline vs. covenant breach, exit multiple vs. IRR
  • Risk flags: Identified risks including refinancing exposure, floating rate sensitivity, and covenant tightness

Quality Checks

  • Pro forma leverage ratios tie exactly to the credit agreement definitions (confirm EBITDA add-backs, pro forma adjustments match lender methodology) [VERIFY]
  • Restricted payments test uses the correct basket and references the operative credit agreement section
  • IRR calculations use actual cash flow dates — not period-end approximations
  • All incremental debt terms reflect current market conditions for the company's credit profile
  • Downside scenarios are genuinely stressful, not cosmetic — test at least a 15% EBITDA decline
  • Dividend amount plus fees plus minimum cash does not exceed gross debt proceeds
  • Model cross-checks: ending cash balance ties to cash flow statement, debt schedule ties to balance sheet, interest expense ties to average balances × applicable rates

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Evaluates activist investor campaigns with thesis assessment, proposed changes, and likely outcome analysis. Use when analyzing activist situations, evaluating campaign theses, or assessing activist track records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates corporate vulnerability to shareholder activism with governance assessment, valuation gaps, and operational improvement opportunities. Use when assessing activist risk, identifying vulnerabilities, or preparing defensive analyses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates bolt-on acquisitions for existing platforms with strategic fit, synergy quantification, and return contribution analysis. Use when screening add-on targets, building platform acquisition strategies, or modeling tuck-in economics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates signal half-life, turnover implications, and capacity constraints for systematic alpha factors. Use when analyzing signal persistence, evaluating factor decay, or estimating strategy capacity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates alternative data sources including satellite, NLP sentiment, web scraping, and geolocation for alpha signal generation. Use when analyzing alt data, evaluating new data sources, or integrating non-traditional signals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

Evaluates competition law exposure with market definition, HHI analysis, and remedy estimation for proposed transactions. Use when assessing merger clearance risk, analyzing market concentration, or preparing HSR filings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CaseMark/skills442026年9月9日 更新

CaseMark のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する