本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

partnership-marketing

Builds reach through other people's audiences — co-marketing partnerships, creator and influencer programs, and community building. Use this to find and evaluate partners, structure a joint campaign or creator deal, plan a community strategy, or decide whether a partnership is worth the coordination cost.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.0 KB
  • references/sources.md1.7 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Partnership marketing

Borrowing an audience is the cheapest reach available and the easiest to do badly.

Affiliates sit next to this rather than inside it: they are a paid channel with commercial terms, their own mechanics and their own fraud controls. revenue:referral-programs covers them.

Evaluating a partner

Fit matters more than size. The test is overlap of audience with non-overlap of offering: they serve the same people, and you do not compete for the same budget.

Check before committing:

  • Audience overlap — same buyer, or merely same industry? Same industry is not enough.
  • Engagement over follower count. A small responsive audience beats a large indifferent one, and follower counts are the easiest number to inflate.
  • Their audience's trust in them. You are borrowing that, and you can spend it.
  • What they get. A partnership that only serves you does not get executed, whatever was agreed.

Structuring

Write down, before anything ships: what each side produces, what each promotes and when, how leads or revenue are attributed, who owns the assets afterward, and what happens if one side does not deliver. Most partnerships fail on the last two, discovered late.

For creator deals specifically: pay for the work, not for promises about performance; require disclosure without exception; and give creative latitude — audiences detect a script and the whole value is that they trust the person's own voice.

Community

A community is a long commitment that pays late. Do not start one to hit a quarterly number.

It works when members get value from each other rather than only from you. That requires a reason to return that is not your product, visible norms, and consistent presence — a community that is quiet for a month does not recover easily. Seed it deliberately with people who will actually post; an empty room stays empty.

Measuring

Attribute honestly. Partnership traffic is often assisted rather than last-touch, so last-touch attribution will under-count it and you will kill something that was working. Agree the measurement method before launch, when neither side is defending a result.

Sources

references/sources.md in this skill lists the outside authorities that settle the questions here — what each one is authoritative for, and what you may do with it. Check them before answering on anything they cover, and cite what you used. Most are free to read and not free to reproduce; the use note on each is binding.

Never

  • Partner with someone whose audience you have not actually looked at.
  • Run a creator campaign without disclosure. The regulatory exposure is real and the reputational cost is worse.
  • Judge a community on member count.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Designs and audits who can reach what — authentication, authorization models, privileged access, service credentials, and joiner-mover-leaver process. Use this to design a permissions model, run an access review, reduce standing privilege, handle offboarding, set up SSO or MFA, manage service and machine credentials, or diagnose why permissions have sprawled.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0422026年9月18日 更新

Concentrates marketing and sales effort on a named set of accounts rather than on volume — qualifying whether the model fits your economics at all, building the account list and the buying group inside each, tiering effort against account value, coordinating so the account experiences one campaign rather than several, and measuring account progression instead of leads. Use this to decide whether to run an account-based program, build one, or work out why an existing one produces activity and no pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0422026年9月18日 更新

Gets new users from signup to first real value — signup flow, onboarding, time-to-value, and the early experience that determines whether someone becomes a user or a lapsed account. Use this to design or fix signup and onboarding, diagnose why signups do not convert to active use, reduce time-to-value, or decide what a new user must accomplish first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0422026年9月18日 更新

Designs orchestrator-and-subagent hierarchies for a repository — splitting agents by exclusive write surface, pairing every producer with an independent auditor, and enforcing the split with a script that runs in CI. Use this whenever the user wants to set up, expand, audit, or fix a multi-agent or subagent structure for a codebase; asks how to divide work between agents; wants agent charters, roles, or a surface map written; or is hitting agents that collide on the same files, review their own work, or drift from their remit. Also use when sizing a roster or deciding whether a new agent is justified.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0422026年9月18日 更新

Governs models and AI systems in production — intended use, evaluation, monitoring, human oversight, documentation, and the decision to deploy or retire. Use this before deploying a model or AI feature, when defining evaluation criteria, when a model's behavior has drifted, when assessing AI risk or regulatory exposure, or when deciding whether an AI system is fit for a consequential decision.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0422026年9月18日 更新

Produces executive-level research — market sizing, competitor mapping, trend analysis, and strategic intelligence — grounded in cited sources with the confidence in each claim made explicit. Use this to analyze a market or industry, map competitors, evaluate a market-entry or build-versus-buy decision, produce a research brief, or assemble evidence for a decision. Also use when comparing options that need a structured, evidence-based verdict rather than an opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cbrock84/headcount2,0422026年9月18日 更新

cbrock84 のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する