本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

age-rating-accuracy

Detects feature patterns that require a higher age rating than commonly submitted, enforcing Guideline 2.3.6 which requires age ratings to accurately reflect the app's content and social features.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Skill: Age Rating Accuracy

<!-- SEO: age rating 4+ 12+ 17+ stranger chat alcohol gambling UGC Guideline 2.3.6 iOS App Store rejection -->

Purpose

Detects feature patterns that require a higher age rating than commonly submitted, enforcing Guideline 2.3.6 which requires age ratings to accurately reflect the app's content and social features.

Apple Guideline

  • Primary: 2.3.6 — Performance: Accurate Metadata — Age Ratings
  • Related: 2.3.1
  • Reference: references/guidelines/2-performance.md

Real-World Rejection Cases

  • Case: Social chat app rated 4+ — reviewer found strangers could message each other — rejected, must be 12+ minimum Source: Apple Developer Forums (Guideline 2.3.6 enforcement) Root cause: Age rating must accurately reflect content; apps enabling stranger communication require 12+ or 17+ rating — reviewers test social features and will flag a 4+ rating if strangers can interact

Trigger

Invoke on any iOS/macOS project before App Store submission to verify the selected age rating is appropriate for the app's features.

Inputs

NameTypeDefaultDescription
project_rootpathcwdiOS/macOS project root
shared_contextobjectnilPre-collected context from appstore-full-audit Phase 1

Actions

Phase 1: Context Collection

Skip this phase if shared_context is provided.

  1. Glob **/*.swift — collect all Swift source files.
  2. Glob **/*.m — collect Objective-C source files.

Phase 2: Checks

  1. Stranger communication features (12+ minimum) Grep pattern "message"|"chat"|"inbox"|"direct message"|"DM"|"send.*message"|"message.*stranger" in **/*.swift. If found and app enables communication with unknown users (not just friends/contacts) → 🟠 HIGH. Flag for 12+ age rating review. Reviewer will test whether strangers can contact each other.

  2. Alcohol or substance references (17+ consideration) Grep pattern "alcohol"|"beer"|"wine"|"spirits"|"liquor"|"cocktail"|"whiskey" in **/*.swift. If found as primary app theme or purchasable content → 🟠 HIGH. Flag for 17+ age rating consideration.

  3. Gambling or wagering features (17+) Grep pattern SKProduct|StoreKit near "bet"|"wager"|"casino"|"slots"|"poker"|"gamble" in **/*.swift. If real-money or simulated gambling found → 🟠 HIGH. Flag for 17+ age rating requirement.

  4. Unmoderated user-generated content (12+ or 17+) Grep pattern "post"|"comment"|"UGC"|"userContent"|"community" in **/*.swift. If unmoderated UGC is possible and no contentFilter|moderateContent patterns detected → 🟠 HIGH. Unmoderated UGC apps typically require 12+ or 17+ rating depending on content type.

Phase 3: Output

Collect all findings from Phase 2 and build the prioritised findings list below. Include file paths and line numbers. Omit tiers with no findings.

Output Format

## Age Rating Accuracy — Findings

### 🔴 CRITICAL — Guaranteed rejection
- [ ] TODO: <exact actionable step> — `file:line` — Guideline 2.3.6

### 🟠 HIGH — Very likely rejection
- [ ] TODO: Review age rating — app enables stranger-to-stranger messaging; minimum 12+ rating required — `ChatViewController.swift` — Guideline 2.3.6
- [ ] TODO: Review age rating — alcohol purchasing/content found; consider 17+ rating — `DrinkMenuViewController.swift:44` — Guideline 2.3.6
- [ ] TODO: Review age rating — simulated gambling or wagering detected; 17+ rating required — `CasinoViewController.swift` — Guideline 2.3.6
- [ ] TODO: Review age rating — unmoderated user-generated content without content filter requires at minimum 12+ rating — Guideline 2.3.6

### 🟡 MEDIUM — Possible rejection
- [ ] TODO: Manually verify age rating in App Store Connect matches all features — use Apple's rating questionnaire as a checklist

### 🟢 LOW — Best practice
- [ ] TODO: Document the age rating rationale in review notes — helps reviewers understand why certain features are rated appropriately

Tools Used

Glob, Grep, Read

Constraints

  • Read-only. No file edits.
  • No network calls.
  • Skip Phase 1 if shared_context is provided by orchestrating agent.
  • Works on Swift, Objective-C, React Native, Flutter projects.

Quick Commands

Run these in your project root to check manually:

# Check for chat/messaging features (may require 12+ rating)
!grep -rn "message\|chat\|inbox\|DirectMessage\b\|\"DM\"" . --include="*.swift" | grep -v "//" | wc -l

# Check for gambling keywords
!grep -rn "bet\b\|wager\|casino\|gambling" . --include="*.swift" -i | grep -v "//"

# Check current age rating in project
!grep -rn "ITSAppUsesNonExemptEncryption\|MinimumOSVersion" . --include="*.plist" | head -5

Swift Anti-Pattern Reference

examples/swift/QualityPatterns.swift

Detection Steps

  1. Find target files

    • Glob: **/*.swift, **/*.m, **/Info.plist
  2. Search for rejection patterns

    • Grep alcohol\|tobacco\|gambling\|casino\|betting\|Gambling — regulated content categories
    • Grep nudity\|explicit\|adult.*content\|NSFW — mature content indicators
    • Grep violence\|gore\|brutal\|Violent — violence content indicators
    • Read Info.plist → check CFBundleShortVersionString for existing age rating indicators
    • Note: Apple determines age rating from a questionnaire about content (violence level, sexual content, profanity, drug/alcohol references, gambling) — not from hardware APIs used
  3. Determine verdict

    • Gambling/casino content found (casino\|betting\|roulette) → flag for 17+ content rating review
    • Explicit or mature content patterns found → flag for age-appropriate rating review
    • Cannot determine age rating from API usage alone — location/camera/messaging APIs do not affect rating
    • All content checks clean → 🟢 pass (confirm rating in App Store Connect questionnaire)
  4. Report

    • Content patterns found that may require a higher content rating
    • Note: Age rating is configured entirely in App Store Connect via a questionnaire — this is a content-pattern hint only
    • Fix: Review the age rating questionnaire in App Store Connect; select accurate answers for violence level, sexual content, profanity, drug references, and gambling

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Detects missing or insufficient in-app account deletion functionality required since June 30, 2022 under Guideline 5.1.1(v) for all apps that support account creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills192026年5月2日 更新

Detects apps that send user data to third-party AI systems without explicit in-app consent and disclosure, enforcing Guideline 5.1.2(i).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills192026年5月2日 更新

Detects placeholder content, stub UI, hardcoded test credentials, and non-production endpoints that signal an incomplete app to reviewers under Guideline 2.1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills192026年5月2日 更新

Detects app name violations including names exceeding 30 characters, beta labels, Apple trademark terms, and version numbers in the display name, enforcing Guideline 2.3.7.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills192026年5月2日 更新

App Store rejection prevention for iOS/macOS apps. Covers privacy, UGC, IAP, metadata, layout, and quality checks based on real Apple rejection cases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills192026年5月2日 更新

Detects analytics or tracking SDKs present without the required App Tracking Transparency prompt, enforcing Guideline 5.1.2(i) which requires user consent before any cross-app or cross-site tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cruisediary/apple-app-review-skills192026年5月2日 更新

cruisediary のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する