本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

data-quality-guardian

Great Expectations, dbt tests, anomaly detection, and data contracts for data quality. Activate on: data quality, data validation, Great Expectations, data contract, anomaly detection, SLA, freshness check, schema validation. NOT for: dbt model structure (use dbt-analytics-engineer), schema evolution (use schema-evolution-manager).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Data Quality Guardian

Implement comprehensive data quality frameworks with automated validation, anomaly detection, data contracts, and SLA monitoring.

Activation Triggers

Activate on: "data quality", "data validation", "Great Expectations", "data contract", "anomaly detection", "SLA", "freshness check", "schema validation", "data observability", "Soda", "elementary"

NOT for: dbt project layout → dbt-analytics-engineer | Schema evolution strategy → schema-evolution-manager | Data migration validation → data-migration-specialist

Quick Start

  1. Define data contracts — agree on schema, freshness, volume, and value ranges with upstream producers
  2. Implement tests — dbt tests for SQL models, Great Expectations for raw/external data
  3. Monitor freshness — alert when source tables are stale beyond SLA
  4. Detect anomalies — statistical checks for volume, distribution, and null rate changes
  5. Build quality dashboard — centralized view of all quality metrics across pipelines

Core Capabilities

DomainTechnologies
Testingdbt tests, Great Expectations 1.x, Soda Core 3.x
Observabilityelementary (dbt), Monte Carlo, Anomalo
ContractsSoda data contracts, dbt model contracts, Protobuf schemas
Anomaly Detectionelementary anomaly monitors, custom z-score, Prophet
AlertingSlack/PagerDuty integration, SLA miss alerts

Architecture Patterns

Multi-Layer Quality Checks

Raw Data (Landing)
    ↓
Layer 1: Schema Validation
    - Column types match contract
    - No unexpected NULLs in required fields
    - Row count within expected range
    ↓
Layer 2: Business Rule Validation
    - Referential integrity (FK relationships hold)
    - accepted_values constraints
    - Custom SQL assertions (e.g., revenue >= 0)
    ↓
Layer 3: Statistical Anomaly Detection
    - Row count deviation from 7-day rolling average
    - Null rate spike detection
    - Distribution shift (KL divergence)
    ↓
Layer 4: Freshness & SLA Monitoring
    - Source loaded within 2 hours
    - Downstream models built within 4 hours
    - Dashboard data <6 hours old

Data Contract YAML

# contracts/payments-contract.yml
contract:
  name: stripe_payments
  owner: payments-team
  version: "2.0"
  sla:
    freshness: 2h          # must be updated within 2 hours
    volume_min: 1000        # at least 1000 rows per day
    volume_max: 500000      # no more than 500k (anomaly if exceeded)
  schema:
    - name: payment_id
      type: string
      required: true
      unique: true
    - name: amount_cents
      type: integer
      required: true
      checks:
        - type: range
          min: 0
          max: 10000000     # $100k max
    - name: status
      type: string
      required: true
      checks:
        - type: accepted_values
          values: [succeeded, failed, pending, refunded]
    - name: created_at
      type: timestamp
      required: true
      checks:
        - type: not_in_future

Anomaly Detection with elementary

# dbt model with elementary anomaly monitors
version: 2
models:
  - name: fct_orders
    tests:
      - elementary.volume_anomalies:
          timestamp_column: created_at
          where: "created_at > dateadd(day, -30, current_date())"
          sensitivity: 3    # z-score threshold
      - elementary.column_anomalies:
          column_name: total_amount
          where: "created_at > dateadd(day, -30, current_date())"
      - elementary.freshness_anomalies:
          timestamp_column: _loaded_at
          sensitivity: 2

Anti-Patterns

  1. Testing only in production — run quality checks in CI on sample data before merging; do not discover issues in production
  2. Alert fatigue — too many low-severity alerts get ignored; tier alerts: P1 (data loss), P2 (quality regression), P3 (informational)
  3. No contract with upstream — without an agreed contract, schema changes break pipelines silently
  4. Static thresholds only — hardcoded "row count > 1000" breaks during holidays; use statistical anomaly detection
  5. Quality checks at the end — validate at each layer (landing, staging, marts); catching errors early is cheaper

Quality Checklist

  • Data contracts defined for all critical sources (schema, freshness, volume)
  • dbt tests on every model: unique, not_null, accepted_values, relationships
  • Freshness monitoring with SLA thresholds and alerting
  • Anomaly detection on row counts, null rates, and value distributions
  • Quality dashboard shows current status across all pipelines
  • Alert severity tiered (P1/P2/P3) to prevent fatigue
  • Quality checks run in CI (pre-merge) and production (post-load)
  • Root cause analysis supported via data lineage integration
  • Monthly data quality review with trending metrics
  • Upstream teams notified within 15 minutes of contract violations

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する