本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

grafana-dashboard-builder

Use when building Grafana dashboards backed by Prometheus, Loki, or Tempo, designing PromQL/LogQL queries, wiring template variables, setting alert rules, building SLO dashboards, or maintaining dashboards as code. Triggers: rate() vs increase() confusion, irate vs rate, label_replace, recording rules, alerting rule expressions, multi-dimensional template variables, ad-hoc filters, dashboard JSON model, provisioning via Terraform/grafonnet, p99 / histogram_quantile usage. NOT for Datadog/New Relic dashboards (vendor-specific), Grafana plugin development, or Loki ingestion pipeline tuning.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md9.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Grafana Dashboard Builder

A good dashboard answers one question per panel and one big question per dashboard. PromQL is more expressive than most engineers use; the recurring traps are rate() vs increase(), label cardinality, and histogram quantile math.

Jump to your fire:

When to use

  • New service needs a default dashboard.
  • A dashboard exists but is unreadable — too many panels, too many series.
  • SLO dashboards (latency p99, error budget burn).
  • Alert expressions that fire correctly without paging on transient blips.
  • Dashboards-as-code: provisioning via Terraform or grafonnet.

Core capabilities

PromQL essentials

# Per-second request rate over 5min window.
rate(http_requests_total[5m])

# Total requests over 5min.
increase(http_requests_total[5m])

# By status code.
sum by (status) (rate(http_requests_total[5m]))

# Error rate (ratio).
sum(rate(http_requests_total{status=~"5.."}[5m]))
/
sum(rate(http_requests_total[5m]))

# Latency p99 from a histogram metric.
histogram_quantile(0.99,
  sum by (le) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
)

rate vs increase vs irate

FunctionReturnsUse for
rate(m[5m])Avg per-second rate over windowMost graphs and alerts. Smooth.
irate(m[5m])Instantaneous rate from last 2 samplesSparkline-style live views. Spiky.
increase(m[5m])Total delta over window"How many requests in 5min." Same as rate * window_seconds.

For alerts, prefer rate over irate — irate over a noisy counter triggers on every blip.

Histograms and le

Histogram metrics emit _bucket{le="..."}, _sum, _count. To compute quantiles:

histogram_quantile(0.99,
  sum by (le, route) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m]))
)

Aggregate by le AND any dimensions you want to keep in the result. Forgetting le returns NaN.

For p99 of all requests across routes:

histogram_quantile(0.99, sum by (le) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])))

label_replace and renaming

# Add a `service` label derived from `job`.
label_replace(up, "service", "$1", "job", "(.+)")

# Drop high-cardinality labels for graphing.
sum without (instance, pod) (rate(http_requests_total[5m]))

without is the cleaner inverse of by — sums everything except the listed labels.

Recording rules

For expensive queries used on many dashboards, pre-compute:

# /etc/prometheus/rules/recording.yml
groups:
- name: orders-api
  interval: 30s
  rules:
  - record: job:http_requests:rate5m
    expr: sum by (job, status) (rate(http_requests_total[5m]))
  - record: job:http_request_duration:p99
    expr: histogram_quantile(0.99, sum by (job, le) (rate(http_request_duration_seconds_bucket[5m])))

Now dashboards query job:http_request_duration:p99 instead of recomputing. Cuts dashboard load time and Prometheus CPU.

Alert rules

groups:
- name: orders-api-alerts
  rules:
  - alert: HighErrorRate
    expr: |
      sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="orders-api",status=~"5.."}[5m]))
      /
      sum(rate(http_requests_total{job="orders-api"}[5m]))
      > 0.05
    for: 10m
    labels: { severity: page, team: orders }
    annotations:
      summary: "Error rate >5% on orders-api"
      runbook: "https://runbooks/orders-api/high-error-rate"

for: 10m is the dwell time — alert only fires after the condition is true for 10 contiguous minutes. Without it, every transient blip pages.

LogQL (Loki)

# Last 5 minutes of error logs.
{service="orders-api"} |= "level=error"

# Parse and filter on a JSON field.
{service="orders-api"} | json | status >= 500

# Rate of errors.
sum by (service) (rate({service="orders-api"} |= "level=error" [5m]))

# Latency from a structured field.
{service="orders-api"} | json | unwrap duration_ms | quantile_over_time(0.99, [5m])

LogQL extends PromQL with |= (contains), !=, |~ (regex), !~, | json, | logfmt, | unwrap.

Template variables

Variable: service
Type: query
Query: label_values(up, job)

Variable: instance
Type: query
Query: label_values(up{job="$service"}, instance)

$service lets the user pick. Multi-value dropdowns + Include All cover the common cases.

For ad-hoc filters, use Grafana's "Ad hoc filters" variable type — adds a label filter applied to every panel.

Dashboard structure

A SLO dashboard typically has:

  1. Top row: SLO compliance (28d burn, error budget remaining), p99 latency, request rate. Big numbers.
  2. Saturation row: CPU, memory, queue depth, connection pool usage.
  3. Latency row: p50/p95/p99, broken down by endpoint or status.
  4. Errors row: error rate by status, error rate by endpoint, top error messages from logs.
  5. Dependencies row: downstream service latencies, DB query rate/latency.

Avoid: pie charts (always wrong), gauges with no comparison, tables of 50+ rows. One question per panel.

Dashboards as code

Terraform:

resource "grafana_dashboard" "orders_api" {
  config_json = file("${path.module}/dashboards/orders-api.json")
  folder      = grafana_folder.api.id
  overwrite   = true
}

Or grafonnet (Jsonnet) for templated dashboards across services. The point is: dashboards are reviewable, diff-able, and recoverable.

Annotations

Mark deploys, incidents, and feature flags on graphs:

# Annotation query — events from a Prometheus metric.
deployment_event{service="orders-api"}

Or use Grafana's annotation API to push events from CI.

Anti-patterns

rate() over a non-counter

Symptom: Negative rates, weird step changes. Diagnosis: rate() only makes sense on monotonically-increasing counters. Applying to a gauge gives garbage. Fix: delta() for gauges, rate() for counters. Use the right one.

irate in alerts

Symptom: Pager fires from a single noisy blip every few hours. Diagnosis: irate reflects the last two samples; one bad sample triggers. Fix: rate(...)[Nm] smoothed over minutes; combine with for: Xm.

Histogram quantile without by (le)

Symptom: Panel shows NaN. Diagnosis: histogram_quantile needs the le label preserved through aggregation. Fix: sum by (le, …) (rate(..._bucket[5m])).

Grafana variable that bloats panels

Symptom: "Include All" on a 5000-instance variable returns 5000 series. Diagnosis: Multi-value variables with too-broad allowance. Fix: Limit values, scope by another variable, or use regex to whittle. Aggregate before display.

Alert for: too short

Symptom: Pager fatigue from intermittent network hiccups. Diagnosis: for: 1m fires on any blip. Fix: for: 5m or for: 10m for SLO-tier alerts. Use for: 0 only for hard-failure metrics ("service down").

Dashboard with 30 panels

Symptom: Slow load, no one reads past the top row. Diagnosis: "Add panel" reflex. Fix: Divide into multiple focused dashboards: SLO, saturation, dependencies, debugging. Cross-link.

Quality gates

  • Every alert has a for: dwell time and a runbook URL.
  • PromQL queries reviewed for rate vs increase vs irate correctness.
  • Histogram quantiles always aggregate by le.
  • Recording rules used for queries that appear on >2 panels.
  • Template variables scoped (not multi-select-everything by default).
  • Dashboards stored as JSON in version control; provisioned, not edited live.
  • SLO dashboard has burn-rate and error-budget panels.
  • Annotations for deploys + incidents enabled.
  • Top row of every dashboard answers "is the system healthy" at a glance.

NOT for

  • Datadog / New Relic / Honeycomb dashboards — vendor-specific. No dedicated skill yet.
  • Grafana plugin development — separate domain. No dedicated skill.
  • Loki ingestion pipeline tuning — different concern. → structured-logging-design for the producer-side schema.
  • Distributed tracing dashboards (Tempo) — overlapping but distinct. → opentelemetry-instrumentation for span/trace generation.
  • Designing the metrics being measured — this skill assumes metrics exist. → opentelemetry-instrumentation for instrumentation patterns.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Expert in 2000s-era music visualization (Milkdrop, AVS, Geiss) and modern WebGL implementations. Specializes in Butterchurn integration, Web Audio API AnalyserNode FFT data, GLSL shaders for audio-reactive visuals, and psychedelic generative art. Activate on "Milkdrop", "music visualization", "WebGL visualizer", "Butterchurn", "audio reactive", "FFT visualization", "spectrum analyzer". NOT for simple bar charts/waveforms (use basic canvas), video editing, or non-audio visuals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Expert legal research agent for finding and scraping expungement data state by state. Knows authoritative sources, URL patterns, Firecrawl configuration, and 2026 legal landscape.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Expert in 3D computer vision labeling tools, workflows, and AI-assisted annotation for LiDAR, point clouds, and sensor fusion. Covers SAM4D/Point-SAM, human-in-the-loop architectures, and vertical-specific training strategies. Activate on '3D labeling', 'point cloud annotation', 'LiDAR labeling', 'SAM 3D', 'SAM4D', 'sensor fusion annotation', '3D bounding box', 'semantic segmentation point cloud'. NOT for 2D image labeling (use clip-aware-embeddings), general ML training (use ml-engineer), video annotation without 3D (use computer-vision-pipeline), or VLM prompt engineering (use prompt-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply crisis decision-making research to agent routing, uncertainty triage, and coordination failure analysis in time-pressured systems. Use when diagnosing handoff failures, analytical paralysis, or expert judgment under incomplete information. NOT for routine coding, simple CRUD design, or static single-agent tasks with complete information.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Use for insight, reframing, contradiction, impasse, and anomaly-driven problem solving when execution effort no longer helps. NOT for routine optimization, error correction, or well-specified tasks with known solution paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

Apply normative BDI reasoning to agents that must detect norms, choose which commitments to internalize, and resolve conflicts by comparing consequences. Use when obligations, prohibitions, or policies collide in autonomous systems. NOT for simple fixed-priority rules, pure constraint satisfaction, or domains where no real normative conflict exists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/windags-skills132026年10月12日 更新

curiositech のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する