本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

ck-fix

Fix a bug using Scout → Diagnose → Fix → Review → Finalize. Use when the user pastes an error message, stack trace, or test failure, or says "fix this bug", "something's broken", "tests are failing", "I'm getting an error". Also accepts `--from-quality <report>` or `--from-test <report>` to fix exactly the findings/failures a report lists. Modes (pick one): --fast (trivial errors — lint, type, build — skip scout and review), --hard (mandatory review, no auto-approve).

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md5.1 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml272 B

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

ck:fix — Structured Bug-Fix Pipeline

Modes — mutually exclusive, pick one (default = Standard: auto-approve on code-reviewer's own APPROVED verdict):

  • --fast — trivial issues (lint, type errors, build errors); skip scout, review, docs
  • --hard — mandatory review, no auto-approve

Report-scoped input (either replaces Step 0's free-text description):

  • --from-quality <report-path> — the target is exactly the blocking findings in a ck:quality report (plans/{slug}/quality/{phase}-quality-report.json).
  • --from-test <report-path> — the target is exactly the failures in a ck:test failure report.

With either flag, fix strictly what the report lists — no expanding scope to adjacent code the report doesn't cite, even if it looks related.


Step 0 — Prerequisites + Scope

--from-quality/--from-test: read the report; its findings/failures are the scope. Skip straight to Step 2 (report evidence replaces Scout).

Otherwise, if no error message, stack trace, or concrete description provided: → "Paste the error message or stack trace." Wait before continuing.

# Scope:
#   Description: {what the user said, or "from {report-path}"}
#   Quick?      → {yes/no — reason}
#   Mode:       {Standard | Quick | Hard}

If --fast or clearly a build/compiler/lint error: skip Step 1 → go directly to Step 2.


Step 1 — Scout

Skip if --from-quality/--from-test (the report already is the evidence).

Spawn scout with the bug description:

  • Greps for error patterns in logs and stack traces
  • Reads affected source files and maps dependencies
  • Checks recent git changes for related commits
// Evidence:
//   Error pattern: NullReferenceException at auth.ts:45
//   Affected files: auth.ts, session.ts
//   Recent change: commit a3f2b1 modified auth.ts (2h ago)

Step 2 — Diagnose

Spawn debugger with the scout evidence report, or with the report's findings/failures directly for --from-quality/--from-test:

  • Forms 2–3 hypotheses from the evidence (or takes the report's required_action/expected vs actual directly — it's already a confirmed root cause, not a hypothesis)
  • Confirms or rejects each against the codebase
  • Applies the minimal fix at the confirmed root cause, scoped to exactly what the report/evidence names
// Hypothesis A: null check missing in auth.ts:45 → CONFIRMED ✓
// Hypothesis B: race condition in session init   → REJECTED ✗
//
// Root cause: missing null guard on req.user before .validate()
// Fix applied: auth.ts:45
// Severity: HIGH | Scope: 1 file

Step 2.5 — Quality Re-verification (when applicable)

If the fix touched any file already covered by an issued quality receipt (plans/{slug}/quality/{phase}-receipt.json), that receipt is now stale — its fingerprint no longer matches the file's bytes. Run ck:quality --verify plans/{slug}/quality/{phase}-quality-report.json before Step 3. CHANGES_REQUIRED sends the fix back to Step 2; do not proceed to Review or Finalize on a stale or rejected receipt.

Skip this step only when the fix touched no file with an existing receipt.


Step 3 — Review

--fast: skip → Step 4.

Spawn code-reviewer: correctness, security, regressions. code-reviewer does not re-score maintainability that ck:quality already approved in Step 2.5 — it checks the bug fix itself, not architecture.

Standard: auto-approve on code-reviewer's APPROVED verdict. Up to 3 fix/re-review cycles (different approach each), then escalate. --hard: no auto-approve — human must explicitly approve before Step 4.


Step 4 — Finalize (MANDATORY)

project-manager (skip --fast): sync plan progress if bug was tracked. docs-manager (skip --fast): update docs if fix changes a public contract. git-manager (always): conventional commit + ask to push.

// git-manager → fix(auth): add null guard on req.user before validate
//            → Push to remote? [y/N]

Agents

AgentStepModes
scout1Standard, --hard (skip if --fast or --from-quality/--from-test)
debugger2All
ck:quality --verify2.5All (only when a touched file has an existing receipt)
code-reviewer3Standard, --hard (skip for --fast)
project-manager4Standard, --hard (skip for --fast)
docs-manager4Standard, --hard (skip for --fast)
git-manager4Always (mandatory)

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Build robust backend systems — APIs (REST, GraphQL, gRPC), authentication (OAuth 2.1, JWT), databases, performance optimization, security (OWASP Top 10), scalability patterns (microservices, caching, sharding), and testing. Use when designing APIs, implementing auth, optimizing queries, handling security vulnerabilities, building microservices, or developing production-ready backend systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

caveman

無料

Terse output mode — strips filler/articles/hedging, ~75% token reduction. Activate whenever: context is filling up, user says be brief/terse/caveman/less tokens, or CAVEMAN_TRIGGERED appears in context. Persists every response until CAVEMAN_RELEASED or user says stop/normal mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

Explore and debate solutions before writing code. Use when the user poses a design question, asks "how should I approach X", wants to think through options before committing, or says anything like "let's brainstorm", "what's the best way to...", "I'm not sure how to tackle this", or "should I use X or Y". Always runs before /ck:plan for novel or ambiguous features. No code is written — only: explore → clarify → spec → report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

ck-cook

無料

Implement a feature phase by phase from a phased JSON master or Markdown plan. Before each phase, confirm whether to create/run unit tests and whether to run ck:quality, unless explicit flags supply those choices. Supports token-budgeted execution, resumable state, and TDD handoff to ck:test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

ck-plan

無料

Plan a feature or system before implementation. Use when the user says "plan this", "I want to build X", "how do I implement Y", or when /ck:brainstorm produces a spec.md. Always run before /ck:cook. Modes (pick one): --fast (simple, single-file), --hard (research + red-team + validate). Composable flag (combine with any mode): --tdd — propagates into the cook pipeline. Every phase gets Design Constraints and Quality/Testing State; ck:cook confirms optional test and quality checks per phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

Create a machine-readable phased JSON plan bundle from a spec or feature description. Produces a compact master manifest plus per-phase step files for resumable ck:cook execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DangQuangSE/team-development-skills192026年10月9日 更新

DangQuangSE のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する