Guide for creating optimized Claude Code agents. Use to design a new specialized agent, a swarm sub-agent, or a multi-agent workflow. Follows the Skill → Agent (preloaded skills) → Skill orchestration pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for large-scale refactorings with Mikado and Strangler Fig. Use for architecture migration, library replacement, module splitting, or pattern changes. Maintains a Mikado graph to track dependencies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
インストール方法を見るインストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Read .claude/roles/senior-dev.md — adopt this profile and follow all its rules.
This skill activates for refactorings that exceed a TDD cycle scope:
| Criterion | Mikado | Strangler Fig |
|---|---|---|
| Old code stays functional during | No | Yes |
| Need to deliver incrementally | Difficult | Ideal |
| Complex dependencies to untangle | Ideal | Possible |
| Complete replacement of a system | Possible | Ideal |
Ask the user which method to use if it's not obvious.
MIKADO - Initialization
Main goal: [description]
Graph file: docs/mikado/[name]-graph.md
I will create the tracking file.
Shall we begin?
Create the graph file:
# Mikado Graph: [Goal]
## Status: IN PROGRESS
## Main goal
- [ ] [Goal description]
## Discovered prerequisites
(Fills in as attempts are made)
## Attempt history
(Log of attempts and discoveries)
MIKADO - Attempt
I will try: [goal or prerequisite]
Expected: [what should break]
Shall we try?
After validation:
yarn test:rungit checkout .MIKADO - Analysis
Attempt: [what we tried]
Result: [success / failure]
Errors encountered:
- [error 1] -> Prerequisite: [required action]
- [error 2] -> Prerequisite: [required action]
I'm updating the graph.
Which prerequisite do we tackle first?
When a prerequisite has no dependencies:
MIKADO - Implementation
Prerequisite to implement: [description]
This is a leaf of the graph (no dependencies).
-> Activating the TDD skill for proper implementation.
Switch to the TDD skill to implement the prerequisite with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
After each implementation:
MIKADO - Validation
Prerequisite completed: [description]
Updating the graph: done
Next action:
- [ ] [Another leaf to process]
- [ ] [Retry a parent goal]
What do we continue with?
STRANGLER - Planning
Old system: [description]
New system: [description]
Entry points to migrate:
1. [point 1]
2. [point 2]
...
I'm creating the tracking file: docs/strangler/[name]-migration.md
Which entry point do we start with?
Create the tracking file:
# Strangler Migration: [Name]
## Status: IN PROGRESS
## Old system
- Location: [path]
- Entry points: [list]
## New system
- Location: [path]
- Migrated entry points: 0/[total]
## Migration plan
| Entry point | Status | Date |
|-------------|--------|------|
| [point 1] | Pending | - |
| [point 2] | Pending | - |
## Old system removal checklist
- [ ] All entry points migrated
- [ ] No references to old code
- [ ] Old system tests removed/migrated
- [ ] Old code deleted
STRANGLER - New system
I will create the new implementation for: [entry point]
Location: [path]
-> Activating the TDD skill for proper implementation.
Switch to the TDD skill to create the new implementation.
STRANGLER - Migration
Entry point: [description]
Old: [code/path]
New: [code/path]
Migration plan:
1. [step 1]
2. [step 2]
Shall we migrate?
STRANGLER - Verification
Migration completed: [entry point]
Checklist:
- [ ] Tests pass
- [ ] Old code still functional (if other dependencies exist)
- [ ] New code used by [consumers]
Updating the tracking file.
Next entry point?
When all entry points are migrated:
STRANGLER - Removal
All entry points have been migrated!
Old code to remove:
- [file 1]
- [file 2]
Tests to remove/migrate:
- [test 1]
Shall we clean up?
Every time we need to implement code (Mikado prerequisite or new Strangler system), we switch to the TDD skill:
-> This prerequisite requires code.
-> Activating the TDD skill to implement with RED-GREEN-REFACTOR.
-> Returning to the Refactoring skill once complete.
Graphs and plans are stored in:
docs/
├── mikado/
│ └── [name]-graph.md
└── strangler/
└── [name]-migration.md
These files serve as living documentation and allow resuming an interrupted refactoring.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
ログインなしで書き込めます。使ってみた感想、質問、動かなかった環境などを気軽にどうぞ。
まだコメントはありません。最初のコメントを書いてみませんか。
Guide for creating optimized Claude Code agents. Use to design a new specialized agent, a swarm sub-agent, or a multi-agent workflow. Follows the Skill → Agent (preloaded skills) → Skill orchestration pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti-overengineering guide based on YAGNI. Use before adding an architectural pattern, during code review, or to challenge an overly complex implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean Architecture (Uncle Bob) guide for this project. Use when creating modules, entities, use cases, presenters, controllers, gateways, guards, services. Contains tactical patterns and structure conventions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit documentation for duplication, staleness, language issues, and verbosity. Read-only — produces an actionable report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Local auto-review of modified code (no GitLab/GitHub). Runs 5 sequential audits and generates a local report. Ideal for validating code before creating a MR/PR.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean Code (Robert C. Martin) guide to produce and challenge code that is readable, durable, simple, and consistent. Covers naming, functions, comments, smells, and refactor heuristics. Complements `/solid` (SOLID principles) and `/anti-overengineering` (YAGNI/KISS). Activate during the REFACTOR phase of the TDD cycle and during implementation self-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。