[Documentation] Use when generating, smart-merging or refactoring the root AI context (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md) and its Claude/Codex projections. Config file only: project-config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Architecture] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for architecture design, compliance review, scalability grading or whole-project audit via --mode={design|review|scalability|full}.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Review modes: For review/audit work, standalone defaults to
--review-only(--report-onlyalias);--fix-loopenables review → validate → authorized fix → fresh re-review, default cap 3.--fix-loop --loop-owner=callerreturns a read-only pass to the caller that owns fixes/re-review. Create triage, review, validation and re-review todo tasks first; apply the carriedreview-policycontract for LOW deferral and user-approved bounded extensions. Non-review modes and terminal findings validation keep their own dispatch.
Goal: Run the selected architecture contract to design a solution, review compliance, grade scalability, or deliver a whole-project health report with evidence-backed decisions.
Summary: Select the explicit --mode → read its complete reference → execute its own phases, evidence gates, flags and outputs → validate and hand off. No mode prints the table and stops, without questions or work. full composes read-only reviewer faces; other modes run independently.
Workflow: Dispatch → load the selected contract → triage targets and plan review tasks → execute the mode → validate → hand off.
Key Rules:
--mode before any work; load only the selected reference in full.Read the named reference in full when its explicit mode is selected. No mode: show this table and stop; ask nothing, run nothing, never infer a default.
| Mode | Purpose and owned contract | Read in full FIRST |
|---|---|---|
| (none) | Show this table; ask nothing; run nothing | — |
--mode=design [brief] | Solution architecture across backend, frontend, data, integration and deployment; ≥3 researched options per concern, ADRs, scaffold/harness handoff and Step-12 user-validation interview | references/mode-design.md |
--mode=review [scope] [--report-only] | Change compliance: 13 serial categories, PASS/WARN/BLOCKED report, Phase-5 validation and bounded review rounds. --report-only returns a read-only leaf report to the caller that owns fixes | references/mode-review.md |
--mode=scalability [init|audit] [scope] | Project or planned-architecture grade: ten-area /20 scorecard, G1-G7, non-scoring TVC and advisory matrices | references/mode-scalability.md |
--mode=full [scope] [--defer=validate] | Whole-project architecture, scalability and production-readiness audit: INLINE orchestrator, three parallel read-only faces, dedup and one consolidated report/verdict. --defer=validate leaves findings validation to the caller's next report-level /why-review gate | references/mode-full.md |
init / audit (also mode=init / mode=audit) are scalability run types, separate from --mode=scalability. Read references/scorecard.md when scoring that mode.full composes modes: its children read and run the scalability and review references plus the separate production-readiness-review skill. Never copy or re-implement a face.MUST ATTENTION Decide supported review choices and recommendations, record the rationale, and finish without routine user questions. Keep round-limit extension, indispensable facts and actual action authority; preserve source coverage, validation, tests, read-only boundaries and budgets. Review decisions do not accept open risks or make a failed gate pass.
<!-- /SYNC:review-decision-autonomy:reminder -->IMPORTANT MUST ATTENTION Goal: Run the selected architecture contract to design a solution, review compliance, grade scalability, or deliver a whole-project health report with evidence-backed decisions.
MUST ATTENTION Main steps: dispatch explicit mode → read its complete contract → triage targets and plan review tasks → execute the mode's phases → validate → hand off.
full runs INLINE and composes read-only sub-agent faces; each face loads its own contract.Anti-Rationalization:
| Evasion | Required action |
|---|---|
| “Architecture means full audit” | Require an explicit mode; otherwise show help and stop. |
| “The summary is enough” | Read the selected reference in full before execution. |
| “Reuse another mode's procedure” | Follow this mode's contract; only full composes faces. |
Protocol guides — Apply each protocol only when its read-when condition holds. If a protocol's text is not in your context, read its file below before you act on it.
review-decision-autonomy — Choose supported review decisions and ask before extending the round budget; running any review or audit skill or mode → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/review-decision-autonomy.mdreview-policy — Review-only or a three-round fix loop with explicit extension and fresh post-fix evidence; deciding round eligibility, blocking findings or review state → .claude/skills/shared/protocols/review-policy.mdMUST ATTENTION Triage all targets, plan and create review/validation/fix/fresh re-review tasks first. Review-only reports without edits; fix-loop freshly reviews every repair under one fixing owner. Default cap three rounds: disclose deferred LOWs, ask and wait before a bounded extension for MEDIUM+ or failed required checks. Preserve scope, coverage and actual operation authority.
<!-- /SYNC:review-policy:reminder -->まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
[Documentation] Use when generating, smart-merging or refactoring the root AI context (CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md) and its Claude/Codex projections. Config file only: project-config.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for AI code or plan review: LLM calls, prompts, agents, RAG, evals and guardrails. --mode={code|plan}; --report-only is read-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Content] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for product/feature ideation with ranked opportunities and validation tests. --mode={roadmap|scope}.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Content] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for business viability: Business Model Canvas, financials, risks and go-to-market recommendation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when a workflow step or the user asks for a focused code-change review: staged, unstaged, branch diff or simple pull request. --fix-loop fixes and re-reviews. Complex pull request: workflow-review-changes; rationale: why-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Code Quality] Use when evaluating received review feedback, reviewing named code on request, or verifying a completion claim. Current diffs: changes-review; rationale: why-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。