本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

audit-agents

Audit or rewrite AGENTS.md so it holds only lasting principles. Run it only when the user asks for it by name; never invoke it on your own.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(2)

  • SKILL.md3.3 KB
  • assets/example-agents.md5.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Audit Agents

AGENTS.md is read by everyone who will ever work on the project. Picture the next thousand contributors over the next hundred years: a line belongs only if it is still true, and still changes what they do, after every file, tool and dependency has been replaced.

Workflow

  1. Read the AGENTS.md and the root readme. This is a document audit: run no builds and no tests.
  2. Give every line one verdict, using the tests below.
    • Keep: a principle that passes every test.
    • Rephrase: a lasting lesson worded in today's mechanics, or too vague to act on.
    • Move: a detail someone needs. Name the owner it belongs to: a readme, a manifest, a skill or a spec.
    • Delete: repetition, history, or a line that changes nothing.
  3. Check the shape against the example below.
  4. Report the findings, highest impact first. Quote each line, give its verdict and the replacement text, and group repeats. Report no finding you can't quote.
  5. Edit only when the user asks for a rewrite. Then start from the example, write the file, and reread it as a newcomer with no history of this session.

Tests for a line

  • A hundred years. No commands, flags, paths, file or function names, dependency choices, tuned values, plans, status or bug stories. Keep the lesson and move the mechanics to their owner. The one exception is a pointer to an owner (a readme or a skill), which exists so the detail can live there.
  • A thousand people. A newcomer can act on it without knowing this session, this author or this month's work.
  • Changes what they do. Delete a line a capable contributor already follows.
  • Plain and concrete. A principle is not an abstraction. "Look at the picture" works; "match verification to the claim" doesn't. Prefer a short sentence with its consequence, and one example from the product over a general noun.
  • Iteration speed. This is the core principle and must be stated outright: optimize the time to feedback you can trust, run the narrowest check that answers the question, and run everything once, when the spec's implementation is finished. Flag any rule that adds process to every loop, puts the full run before a commit, merge, push or finished feature, or names checkpoints for it along the way. The full run comes earlier only when the next piece of work can't be trusted without it. Never trade away a real acceptance requirement for speed.

Shape

assets/example-agents.md is an AGENTS.md any project can adopt, and it owns the section order. Read it before judging the shape or rewriting.

To adopt it, copy it and resolve every <…>; none may survive into the project's file.

  • <skill: name> names a skill from the pack this skill ships in. Replace it with a link to that skill where the project installs it. If the project doesn't have the skill, drop the pointer and keep the principle.
  • <skill: the project's own …> stands for a skill only this project has. Link it, or delete the sentence.
  • Every other <…> is filled from the project's readme.

Delete a section the project doesn't need; add one only for a principle that fits nowhere else.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audit the choices an implementing agent made, not its diff — a pure decision audit that traces the session's history into a choices ledger, changes no code, and never blocks an unsupervised run. Working code still embeds architecture the user never chose; surface it because future work inherits it. Use when the user wants to review the decisions the AI made on their behalf, before merging or committing AI-implemented work, when integrating a delegated subagent's pass, or when a fix "works" but might be a point fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dzhng/skills1,2902026年10月12日 更新

Audit and prioritize performance work through bounded-work and forward-progress checks. Use when asked to find performance issues, investigate freezes/500s/OOMs, review retries or polling for no-progress loops, rank a performance backlog, or implement the next simple performance fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dzhng/skills1,2902026年10月12日 更新

Audit whether tests earn their maintenance cost and which suite owns each contract. Use when pruning redundant tests, investigating implementation coupling or test-only production hooks, reviewing the value of proposed coverage, or auditing an entire subsystem. Use write-tests to implement the resulting test changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dzhng/skills1,2902026年10月12日 更新

Run fast, progressive experiments to map tunable parameters and their effects. Use when optimizing code, prompts, configurations, or other artifacts against a goal or benchmark, or when a long research run needs a planned hypothesis queue, focused trials, and durable findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dzhng/skills1,2902026年10月12日 更新

claude

無料

Use Claude Code as an independent `claude -p` subagent when the user explicitly asks for Claude, wants a second-agent opinion from Claude, or asks to delegate a well-scoped task to Claude. Supports selecting `--model` and thinking/effort level with defaults of `opus` and `high`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dzhng/skills1,2902026年10月12日 更新

When a spec under specs/<feature>/ is done shipping (a write-spec build, or any planned task that produced a spec), archive it to specs/done/ and rewrite it from a build-plan into a durable rationale — the why, the principles, the invariants — pointing back to the real code for the how. Use when implementation has landed and the plan no longer matches what shipped, or the user says a feature/spec is finished. Pairs with [write-spec](../write-spec/SKILL.md) (the plan this closes) and [review](../review/SKILL.md) (run before closing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

dzhng/skills1,2902026年10月12日 更新

dzhng のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する