Review Test Style — Incan Compiler

Purpose

/review-test-style is a narrow report-only reviewer for touched tests and code changes that imply missing test coverage.

Own:

• panic helpers and panic-style control flow in touched tests
• unwrap/expect in tests
• fallible tests not returning Result
• obvious missing targeted coverage for new behavior

Do not own:

• rustdoc prose
• docs truthfulness
• architecture
• final branch-clean judgment

Output artifact

Write a slice report at:

• .agents/state/review-report.test-style.md

Do not write to the canonical .agents/state/review-report.md.

Workflow

1. Review the touched tests and the code changes that should have tests.
2. Flag:
   • .unwrap() / .expect() in tests
   • panic!-driven helper/control flow where Result + assertions would be clearer
   • missing targeted tests for new CLI, lifecycle, or semantic behavior
   • stale snapshots or missing integration coverage when behavior changed end-to-end
3. Only flag a coverage gap when the new behavior or branch is not exercised anywhere in the touched tests. If integration coverage already exercises the behavior, do not demand redundant parser/unit duplication without a concrete reason.
4. Keep this pass focused on test quality and coverage, not general code quality.

Slice report shape

Keep slice reports findings-first. Only list clean surfaces when they are materially useful to the orchestrator.

# Review Slice Report

- role: test-style
- worker: <agent-id or stable label>
- status: in_progress | clean | blocked

## Scope
- assigned files:
  - loaves/toolchain/incan-cli/tests/integration_tests.rs

## Findings

- [ ] warning | test-gap | panic helper | loaves/toolchain/incan-cli/src/lib.rs:84
  Test helper uses panic-oriented control flow instead of `Result` + assertions.

## Reviewed Clean Surfaces

- loaves/toolchain/incan-cli/tests/integration_tests.rs — touched lifecycle coverage reviewed; no additional findings

If there are no findings, say so explicitly.