Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Regenerate docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md from provenance/borrows.jsonl after any ledger change — even a single new entry — never hand-edit the notices file
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
provenance/borrows.jsonl just gained, lost, or changed a line (a new
borrow was ledgered via
license-compliance-borrow-check,
or a correction line was appended).npx tsx node_modules/@event4u/agent-config/src/scripts/lint_provenance.ts
reports the notices file is out of sync with the ledger.Do NOT use when:
license-compliance-borrow-check;
this skill only regenerates the derived file from an already-updated
ledger.license-compliance-borrow-check's discipline
first; this skill cannot repair a bad ledger, only render it.provenance/borrows.jsonl (it may
be legitimately empty) and note how many lines it has before
regenerating, so the diff is checkable.npx tsx node_modules/@event4u/agent-config/src/scripts/lint_provenance.ts --regenerate-notices
docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md before vs. after — confirm only
that generated file changed, and that provenance/borrows.jsonl itself
was not touched (it is append-only; this command never writes to it).npx tsx node_modules/@event4u/agent-config/src/scripts/lint_provenance.ts
Exit code 0 confirms every ledger record is schema-valid, no deny-class
or unknown license slipped through, no transformation note reads as
rename-only, and the notices file now matches the ledger byte-for-byte.docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md to make it pass. Fix the actual offending
line in provenance/borrows.jsonl via
license-compliance-borrow-check,
then re-run step 2.<source_url>
(<license>)", or "no borrows recorded" for the honest empty-ledger
state).lint_provenance (no flag) exit code, confirming sync —
never report success on the regenerate step alone.docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md is generated — a hand-edit is invisible
until the next lint_provenance run flags the drift as a linter failure,
not as an obvious diff. Always regenerate; never patch the file directly.lint_provenance
(no flag) still fails after regenerating, the defect is in
provenance/borrows.jsonl, not in the notices file.docs/THIRD-PARTY-NOTICES.md.lint_provenance (no-flag) run —
regeneration and validation are two different checks; passing one does
not imply the other passed.provenance/borrows.jsonl from this skill —
that belongs to license-compliance-borrow-check.code-provenance — the rule that makes
a ledger entry mandatory before a conscious borrow lands.license-compliance-borrow-check —
where new ledger entries are drafted and fixed.provenance/README.md — the ledger's append-only contract.node_modules/@event4u/agent-config/src/scripts/lint_provenance.ts — the linter this skill wraps.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。