Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing customer onboarding — time-to-first-value, milestone design, friction audit, drop-off diagnosis. Triggers on 'fix onboarding', 'why do new accounts churn fast'.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Do NOT use to onboard employees (that is the Wing-4
employee-onboarding program — different audience, different
contract), diagnose long-cycle churn (route to
churn-prevention), or run the full visitor → paid funnel (route
to funnel-analysis).
docs/contracts/mental-models.md § 14.mental-models.md § 16.mental-models.md § 13.context-spine.Inspect the actual funnel: signup → milestone-1 → milestone-2 → activation → D30. For each transition pull conversion rate (with band) and median time-to-transition for the last two cohorts. Inspect whether the activation event correlates with paid retention; if not, the activation event is mis-defined and Step 2 fixes it.
Write the sentence: "<Segment> reaches first value when <observable buyer action> happens, by <target hours / days> after signup." The action must be observable in instrumentation, must correlate with paid retention (Step 0 inspection), and must be something the buyer accomplishes — not something the product displays.
Each milestone is a buyer action with a definition, a friction audit, and a default outcome.
For each milestone, time the buyer journey: clicks, fields, decision points, wait states. Tag each as blocker (cannot proceed without it), toll (proceed but slow), or fog (buyer unsure what to do next). Fog kills more onboarding than blockers — fog is silent.
The drop-off is rarely uniform. Segment by segment × milestone; the cell with the steepest below-band drop is the binding fix. Two cells dropping at once usually means a shared upstream cause (account-provisioning failure, ICP mismatch) — fix upstream, not in the milestone.
Hand the time-to-first-value definition, the three milestones with
friction audits, and the segment × milestone drop-off table to the
implementing team and to
churn-prevention for downstream
health-score signal definition. Onboarding owns days 0–30;
churn-prevention owns the signals after.
WHEN to use this
WHEN NOT to use this
churn-prevention.expansion-playbook.funnel-analysis.activation-design.time-to-first-value.md — falsifiable definition: segment × observable action × target time × correlation with paid retention.milestones.md — three milestones, each with definition · friction audit (blocker / toll / fog) · default outcome.dropoff-table.md — segment × milestone conversion rates with bands; binding-fix cell flagged.B2B mid-market analytics tool, D30 retention sagging from 71 % to 58 % over two quarters.
churn-prevention picks up D30+ health-score signals.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Use when reviewing UI for accessibility — WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard nav, focus, ARIA, contrast, screen-reader semantics — even on 'is this a11y-OK?' or 'mach das barrierefrei'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when defining or auditing the activation event — aha-moment selection, retention correlation, falsifiable definition. Triggers on 'what is our aha moment', 'redefine activation'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when capturing an architectural decision — file naming, next ADR number, Status / Context / Decision / Consequences, index regen; fires even without saying 'ADR'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial critique — devil's advocate, stress-test, honest teardown ('poke holes', 'be brutal', 'was hältst du davon'); explicit request only. Routine code or design review → code-review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reading, creating, or updating agent documentation, module docs, roadmaps, or AGENTS.md. Understands the full .augment/, agents/, and copilot-instructions structure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for an adversarial red-team / blue-team / auditor review of an AI agent's CONFIG + behaviour (rules, skills, MCP, hooks, permissions) — attack-chain → defensive-gap list, not a code audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。