本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

analyzing-health-insurance-plans

Evaluates health insurance plan structures with actuarial value, network analysis, and cost projection. Use when analyzing health plans, comparing coverage, or projecting healthcare costs.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md6.2 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Analyzing Health Insurance Plans

When To Use

  • Comparing multiple health insurance plan options (employer group, individual market, or Medicare Advantage)
  • Evaluating actuarial value and metal-tier classification accuracy
  • Projecting out-of-pocket costs under different utilization scenarios
  • Assessing network adequacy for a specific population or geographic area
  • Reviewing plan design changes for renewal or repricing cycles
  • Analyzing reinsurance attachment points and stop-loss adequacy relative to plan exposure

Inputs To Gather

  • Plan documents: Summary of Benefits and Coverage (SBC), Schedule of Benefits, Certificate of Coverage, Evidence of Coverage
  • Rate filings: Premium rates by tier (single, employee+spouse, family), age-banding tables if applicable
  • Network data: Provider directory or network ID, in-network vs. out-of-network reimbursement schedules, any tiered or narrow network designations
  • Claims history (if available): Aggregate paid claims, large-claimant data, utilization rates by service category
  • Census data: Member demographics, enrollment counts by tier, geographic distribution
  • Formulary: Drug tier structure, prior authorization requirements, specialty drug handling
  • Reinsurance/stop-loss terms: Specific and aggregate attachment points, lasering exclusions, contract period (paid vs. incurred basis)
  • Comparison context: Benchmark plans, prior-year plan design, or competing carrier quotes

Workflow

  1. Classify the plan structure

    • Identify plan type: HMO, PPO, EPO, POS, HDHP/HSA-eligible, or hybrid
    • Confirm metal tier (Bronze/Silver/Gold/Platinum) or equivalent actuarial value band
    • Note any non-standard design features: reference-based pricing, direct primary care carve-outs, or centers-of-excellence requirements
  2. Calculate actuarial value

    • Map cost-sharing parameters: deductible, coinsurance, copays, out-of-pocket maximum (OOPM)
    • Apply standard continuance tables or the CMS AV Calculator methodology to estimate the plan's share of total allowed costs [VERIFY: confirm which AV calculator version or methodology is required for the filing year]
    • Flag deviations from de minimis AV ranges for the stated metal tier (±2 percentage points under ACA rules) [VERIFY: state-specific AV requirements may differ]
  3. Analyze network adequacy

    • Check provider-to-member ratios for primary care, specialty, and facility categories against applicable state or CMS standards [VERIFY: network adequacy standards vary by state and market segment]
    • Identify geographic access gaps using drive-time/distance thresholds
    • Assess out-of-network exposure: balance billing protections, surprise billing act applicability, reference pricing methodology
  4. Project member cost exposure

    • Model total cost of care under low, moderate, and high utilization scenarios
    • Calculate effective member cost share: premiums + expected out-of-pocket spend per scenario
    • Compare across plans using equivalent annual cost metrics (premium + expected OOP at each utilization level)
    • For HDHP plans, factor in HSA/HRA employer contributions and tax-advantage value
  5. Evaluate pharmacy benefits

    • Map formulary tiers and typical member cost for high-utilization drug categories
    • Identify specialty drug exposure and accumulator/maximizer program impact on OOPM
    • Note step therapy, prior authorization, and quantity limit protocols
  6. Assess risk transfer and reinsurance

    • Review specific stop-loss attachment points relative to historical large-claimant frequency
    • Evaluate aggregate stop-loss corridor and expected claims variability
    • Flag any lasered members or excluded conditions and quantify retained risk
    • For self-funded plans, assess claims-fund adequacy and IBNR reserves
  7. Compile comparative analysis

    • Build side-by-side comparison matrix covering: premiums, cost sharing, AV, network breadth, pharmacy, and risk transfer
    • Rank plans on total effective cost, network quality, and financial risk exposure
    • Highlight material trade-offs (e.g., lower premium but narrow network, high deductible offset by HSA funding)

Output

  • Plan Analysis Summary: One-page overview with plan classification, AV calculation result, and key cost metrics
  • Cost Projection Table: Low/moderate/high utilization scenario modeling with annual premium + OOP totals per plan
  • Network Adequacy Assessment: Provider ratio analysis, geographic access findings, and out-of-network risk notes
  • Pharmacy Benefit Summary: Formulary tier structure, specialty drug exposure, and accumulator program flags
  • Reinsurance/Stop-Loss Review (if applicable): Attachment point adequacy, retained risk quantification, and lasering impact
  • Comparative Matrix: Side-by-side plan ranking with trade-off commentary
  • Flagged Items: Any data gaps, assumptions made, or items requiring [VERIFY] follow-up

Quality Checks

  • Confirm all cost-sharing parameters (deductible, coinsurance, copay, OOPM) are captured for both in-network and out-of-network tiers
  • Verify AV calculations use the correct methodology and plan year assumptions
  • Ensure utilization scenarios reflect realistic claims distributions (not just arbitrary multiples)
  • Check that premium comparisons use consistent contribution assumptions (gross vs. net of employer subsidy)
  • Validate network data is current — provider directories can be 60–90 days stale
  • Confirm reinsurance terms match the contract period and claims basis (paid vs. incurred)
  • Flag any state-mandated benefit requirements that could affect plan design comparability [VERIFY: essential health benefit benchmark varies by state]
  • Mark all jurisdiction-dependent regulatory references with [VERIFY]

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

FDU-INS のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する