本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

analyzing-insurance-financials

Structures insurance company financial analysis with combined ratio, reserve adequacy, and capital metrics. Use when analyzing insurance financials, evaluating combined ratios, or assessing reserve strength.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md7.1 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Analyzing Insurance Financials

Structures insurance company financial analysis around underwriting profitability, reserve adequacy, investment performance, and capital strength to produce actionable assessments of insurer financial health.

When To Use

  • Evaluating an insurer's underwriting discipline via combined ratio decomposition
  • Assessing loss reserve adequacy for due diligence, M&A, or regulatory review
  • Benchmarking capital and solvency metrics against rating agency thresholds
  • Analyzing reinsurance program effectiveness and net retention exposure
  • Reviewing statutory filings (Annual Statement, Quarterly Statement) or GAAP financials for trend analysis
  • Supporting investment decisions in insurance equities, surplus notes, or ILS

Inputs To Gather

  • Financial statements: Statutory Annual/Quarterly Statements (filed with NAIC), GAAP 10-K/10-Q, or IFRS 17 reports
  • Line-of-business detail: Schedule P (loss development triangles), Schedule H (accident & health), or equivalent breakdowns
  • Investment portfolio: Schedule D (bonds), Schedule BA (other invested assets), asset quality distribution
  • Reinsurance structure: Schedule F (ceded reinsurance), Schedule S (reinsurance assumed), treaty summaries
  • Rating agency reports: AM Best, S&P, Moody's, or Fitch insurer financial strength ratings and rationale
  • Peer/industry benchmarks: NAIC industry aggregates, SNL/S&P Capital IQ comparables, or relevant cohort data
  • Time horizon: Minimum 3-5 years of historical data for trend analysis; 10 years preferred for reserve development

Workflow

  1. Classify the insurer — Identify line mix (P&C vs. life/health vs. multiline), domicile, and regulatory regime. Note whether analysis uses statutory accounting (SAP), GAAP, or IFRS 17. [VERIFY] applicable accounting framework and jurisdictional requirements.

  2. Decompose the combined ratio

    • Calculate loss ratio (net incurred losses / net earned premiums) by accident year and calendar year
    • Calculate expense ratio (underwriting expenses / net written premiums for SAP; / net earned premiums for GAAP trade ratio)
    • Break out loss adjustment expense (LAE) into defense & cost containment (DCC) vs. adjusting & other (A&O)
    • Compute combined ratio = loss ratio + expense ratio; flag any result above 100% (underwriting loss)
    • Analyze trends over 3-5 years; identify deteriorating or improving lines of business
  3. Evaluate reserve adequacy

    • Review Schedule P loss development triangles (paid and incurred) for the most recent 10 accident years
    • Calculate development factors and compare to industry benchmarks
    • Identify adverse or favorable prior-year reserve development and quantify impact on calendar-year results
    • Assess carried reserves vs. actuarial central estimate — note any margin (redundancy) or deficiency
    • Flag lines with long-tail exposure (e.g., general liability, workers' comp, professional liability) for deeper review
  4. Analyze investment portfolio and yield

    • Compute net investment income yield (NII / average invested assets)
    • Review asset allocation: percentage in investment-grade bonds, equities, alternatives, real estate, cash
    • Assess credit quality distribution (NAIC designation 1-6 for statutory; rating agency equivalents)
    • Calculate total return on invested assets including realized/unrealized gains
    • Evaluate asset-liability duration matching — flag significant mismatches
  5. Assess capital adequacy and leverage

    • Calculate net premiums written to policyholders' surplus (NPW/PHS) — flag if >3:1 for P&C [VERIFY] threshold by line
    • Review Risk-Based Capital (RBC) ratio (Total Adjusted Capital / Authorized Control Level) — regulatory minimum is 200% company action level
    • Compute net leverage ratio (net liabilities / PHS) and gross leverage including reinsurance recoverables
    • Analyze quality of surplus: note any surplus notes, goodwill, DTA, or non-admitted assets reducing adjusted surplus
    • Compare to AM Best Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR) thresholds for target rating level
  6. Evaluate reinsurance program

    • Assess ceded ratio (ceded premiums / gross written premiums) — high cession may indicate capital constraints
    • Review reinsurer credit quality and concentration risk (Schedule F penalties for unauthorized/undercollateralized reinsurers)
    • Analyze net retention relative to surplus for catastrophe and per-risk exposures
    • Identify any commutation activity or material disputes in reinsurance recoverables
  7. Benchmark and synthesize

    • Compare all key metrics to peer group and industry medians
    • Identify outlier metrics (positive or negative) and explain drivers
    • Assign qualitative assessment of financial strength: strong / adequate / marginal / weak
    • Highlight key risks: reserve uncertainty, catastrophe exposure, investment concentration, reinsurance dependency

Output

Structure the analysis report with the following sections:

  • Executive Summary: One-paragraph financial health assessment with key metrics and conclusion
  • Company Profile: Line mix, domicile, size (DPW, total assets, surplus), rating history
  • Underwriting Analysis: Combined ratio decomposition with 3-5 year trend tables by line
  • Reserve Analysis: Development triangle summary, prior-year development history, adequacy assessment
  • Investment Analysis: Portfolio composition, yield analysis, credit quality, duration
  • Capital & Leverage: RBC ratio, NPW/PHS, net leverage, surplus quality, BCAR positioning
  • Reinsurance Review: Ceded ratio, reinsurer quality, net retention adequacy
  • Peer Comparison: Side-by-side table of key metrics vs. selected comparables
  • Key Risks & Considerations: Bullet list of material risk factors with severity indication
  • Appendix: Supporting schedules, data sources, glossary of metrics

Quality Checks

  • Confirm all ratios use consistent numerator/denominator definitions (SAP vs. GAAP vs. trade basis) — do not mix frameworks
  • Verify that loss development triangles foot to Schedule P Part 1 summary and that incurred = paid + case reserves + IBNR
  • Cross-check that NPW reconciles across the income statement, balance sheet, and Schedule T (state page)
  • Ensure RBC ratio uses the correct formula for entity type (P&C vs. life vs. health) [VERIFY]
  • Validate that reinsurance recoverables on the balance sheet tie to Schedule F detail
  • Confirm peer benchmarks are from the same reporting period and use the same accounting basis
  • Flag any metric where data was estimated, interpolated, or unavailable with [VERIFY]
  • Check that all trend commentary is supported by the underlying numerical data — no unsupported qualitative claims

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

FDU-INS のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する