本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

auth-packet-summary

Validates and summarizes the four required authorization forms in a personal injury matter (retainer, HIPAA release, insurance authorization, employment record release). Confirms signatures, dates, scope, and completeness to determine readiness for the investigation phase. Use when reviewing client onboarding packets, verifying authorization forms before discovery, or checking HIPAA and record-release compliance.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md4.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Authorization Packet Summary

Validates the four essential client authorization forms and produces a checklist plus formal memorandum confirming the firm's authority to request third-party records.

Prerequisites

  • All client-signed authorization forms uploaded to the matter
  • Client full legal name and case/matter number
  • Firm style guide (letterhead, fonts, margins) for PDF output

Required Forms

FormPurpose
Retainer Fee AgreementEstablishes attorney-client relationship and fee structure
HIPAA Medical Record ReleaseAuthorizes healthcare providers to disclose PHI
Insurance Communication AuthorizationPermits carrier contact and claims file access
Wage & Employment Record ReleaseAllows access to employment history, wages, personnel files

Workflow

1. Extract

For each form, extract:

  • Client full legal name (as printed)
  • Case/matter number
  • Execution date
  • Authorized record categories and temporal scope
  • Named entities/providers
  • Witness signatures and notarization (if jurisdiction requires)

2. Validate

Assign one status per form:

StatusCriteria
Complete and ValidAll required elements present — signatures, dates, scope, mandatory fields
Received but DeficientForm present; specify missing elements exactly
Not ReceivedForm absent from case file

Per-form checklist:

  • Client signature present and legible
  • Date fully completed
  • Mandatory fields filled (name, DOB, case/matter, scope)
  • Witness/notarization present if required by state law
  • No expiration issues under applicable privacy regulations

3. Cross-Reference

Compare across all four forms for consistency in client name spelling, case/matter number, and date ranges. Flag all discrepancies.

4. Compile Checklist

Produce a table with columns: Authorization Type, Status, Execution Date, Authorized Entities, Scope Limitations, Notes/Deficiencies.

For deficient or missing forms, specify exact corrective action (e.g., "Missing client signature on page 2").

5. Draft Memorandum

Write a formal memo containing:

  1. Status statement — As of [date], whether all authorizations are complete or what remains outstanding
  2. Per-form scope summary — Each authorization's scope, noting temporal or entity-specific limitations
  3. Issues — Name discrepancies, missing signatures, approaching expirations
  4. Conclusion — Either:
    • "Investigation phase may commence; firm authorized to request records from all identified entities within scope of client consent," OR
    • "Corrective actions required before record requests may proceed" with specifics

Tone: formal, definitive, suitable as permanent case file record.

Output

  1. Authorization Checklist — structured table for case management reference
  2. PDF Memorandum — firm letterhead, serif 11–12pt, 1-inch margins, header with case ID/client/date/subject, footer with page numbers and ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL / ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT, signature lines per firm policy

Pitfalls

  • Never mark "Complete and Valid" unless every required element is confirmed present
  • If any form is deficient or missing, do not authorize commencement of record requests
  • Note scope limitations prominently — staff requesting records must know consent boundaries
  • Resolve name-spelling discrepancies by reference to the original document; flag for correction
  • Jurisdiction-specific witnessing/notarization requirements vary by state; flag any uncertainty
  • All output is privileged and confidential; transmit only via secure channels

Key changes made:

  • Frontmatter: Removed tags (not part of the spec), tightened the description to be third-person with clear trigger guidance
  • Structure: Reorganized into Overview → Prerequisites → Required Forms → Workflow → Output → Pitfalls pattern
  • Conciseness: Collapsed the verbose Step 2 status table and validation checklist, merged Output Documents into a compact section, trimmed the Guidelines section into a focused Pitfalls list
  • Removed redundancy: Eliminated the empty checklist table template (Step 4) — the column spec is sufficient; removed the repeated "tone" guidance that was implicit
  • Line count: Reduced from 115 lines to ~85 lines while preserving all domain-critical content

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills762026年7月12日 更新

FDU-INS のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する