Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Formally verify construction payment bonds by extracting fields from bond documents and cross-referencing against Treasury Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Use whenever the user uploads a payment bond PDF, mentions bond verification, asks "is this bond valid", references AIA A312, or needs to verify a surety company's authority to write bonds. Also trigger on "verify bond", "check surety", "payment bond", "performance bond", or "Circular 570."
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Verify that a construction payment bond is valid, the surety is authorized, and the bond covers the project requirements. This is the marketplace's trust layer — operators won't bid on tasks without verified payment security.
Accept: pasted bond text, PDF file path, or extracted fields (bond number, surety, principal, obligee, penal sum, date). If a PDF, extract text and identify the AIA A312 or ConsensusDocs 260 field structure.
Identify and extract these fields. Mark each as FOUND or NOT FOUND:
Read references/circular-570-verification.md for the verification process.
Check:
Check:
Output:
{
"verification_status": "VERIFIED | FAILED | PARTIAL",
"bond_number": "...",
"surety": {
"name": "...",
"circular_570_listed": true,
"state_licensed": true,
"underwriting_limit": "$...",
"am_best_rating": "A+",
"naic_code": "..."
},
"principal": "...",
"obligee": "...",
"penal_sum": "$...",
"coverage_sufficient": true,
"effective_date": "...",
"checks": [
{"check": "Surety on Circular 570", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
{"check": "Licensed in MI", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
{"check": "Penal sum covers tasks", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
{"check": "Bond is current", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
{"check": "Obligee matches project", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."},
{"check": "Principal matches poster", "result": "PASS|FAIL", "detail": "..."}
],
"warnings": [],
"requires_human": ["Contact surety to confirm bond is active (not cancelled)"]
}
python scripts/validate_bond_verification.py < report.json
references/circular-570-verification.md — How to check Circular 570, state licensing, and underwriting limits. Includes URLs for Treasury data download and surety verification portals.references/bond-field-definitions.md — AIA A312 and ConsensusDocs 260 field definitions and where to find them in the document.This skill verifies the bond document against public records. It does NOT:
These limitations are stated in every output under requires_human.
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。