Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify claims, quotes, timelines, and findings against supplied source files and return a source map with verified, conflicting, not found, and manual-review statuses. Use when the user asks to fact-check a memo, audit, timeline, executive summary, research packet, or project brief against PDFs, XML, HTML, notes, screenshots, exported chat logs, or other supplied files before sending, publishing, or relying on the result.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
Turn a draft or claim set into a traceable evidence map. Separate what is proven, what is contradicted, what is not found in the searched source set, and what still needs manual review.
| Parameter | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Formatting | Table-first; each claim gets a discrete status row |
| Tone | Factual, restrained, audit-style |
| Scope | Verification only; do not rewrite the whole narrative unless the verification results require targeted remediation |
| Grounding | Every verified or conflicting result must trace to a named file, source location, or quoted passage |
| Defaults | Use the fixed status taxonomy and keep unsourced claims unresolved rather than downgraded into speculation |
| Fallback | If search or extraction is partial, return the searched scope, likely matches, and manual-review flags instead of overstating certainty |
| Triggering | Use for source mapping, quote verification, claim checking, contradiction audits, and pre-release fact review |
| Restrictions | Do not treat absence as falsity without naming the searched scope; do not paraphrase a quote as verified unless the exact wording or a faithful equivalent is present |
verified, verified in broader bundle, conflicting, not found in searched sources, or manual review needed.| Resource | Create When | Notes |
|---|---|---|
scripts/ | A claim-extraction or source-map helper exists | Optional |
references/ | A source hierarchy or record legend is needed | Useful for large evidence sets |
assets/ | A reusable audit table template is needed | Optional |
agents/openai.yaml | The skill should appear cleanly in the UI | Keep the UI prompt focused on verification |
Preferred status meanings:
verified: supported in the exact searched packetverified in broader bundle: supported locally, but outside the narrow packet under reviewconflicting: the source materially contradicts the draft claimnot found in searched sources: not located in the named search scopemanual review needed: likely present, but extraction, image content, or ambiguity blocks automatic confirmationverified or conflicting row includes a concrete citation or file reference.not found row distinguishes source absence from search limitation.scripts/quick_validate.py <path/to/skill-folder> before delivery.まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。