Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing clinical notes, documenting sessions, creating treatment plans for insurance/authorization, ensuring HIPAA compliance, or need structured documentation templates. Provides SOAP notes, progress notes (DAP format), and treatment plan templates. HIPAA-compliant guidance included.
インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。
This skill provides templates and guidance for standard clinical documentation formats used in mental health settings. Includes SOAP notes, progress notes, and treatment plan documentation.
Clinical Context: Clear, concise documentation supports continuity of care, meets regulatory requirements, and protects both patient and clinician. These templates provide structure while allowing for individualized clinical narrative.
| Template | Purpose | Setting | Key Sections |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOAP Notes | Session documentation | All settings | Subjective, Objective, Assessment, Plan |
| Progress Notes | Session summaries | Outpatient/residential | Varies by format (DAP, BIRP, GIRP) |
| Treatment Plan Format | Treatment planning documentation | All settings | Goals, objectives, interventions, timeline |
| Need | Use |
|---|---|
| Session note | SOAP or DAP/BIRP/GIRP |
| Treatment plan | Treatment Plan Template |
| Safety issue | Safety Documentation Protocols |
Use this mode when the clinician asks to build a note step-by-step.
This skill can be invoked when you need to:
Example requests:
Purpose: Systematic documentation of clinical encounters ensuring all essential elements are addressed.
Structure:
S - Subjective:
O - Objective:
A - Assessment:
P - Plan:
SOAP Writing Guide (Quick):
Example (abbreviated SOAP):
S: "I've been less anxious this week but still waking at 3am."
O: MSE WNL, GAD-7 = 11 (moderate), PHQ-9 = 8 (mild)
A: Moderate anxiety with partial response; no SI/HI; risk low
P: CBT worry time, sleep hygiene plan, follow-up in 2 weeks
DAP Notes (Data, Assessment, Plan):
BIRP Notes (Behavior, Intervention, Response, Plan):
GIRP Notes (Goals, Intervention, Response, Plan):
Brief Examples:
DAP Example:
D: Reports panic episodes 2x this week; sleep 5-6 hours; GAD-7=13
A: Moderate anxiety with persistent impairment; risk low
P: Continue CBT, add interoceptive exposure; follow-up in 1 week
BIRP Example:
B: Tearful, low energy, limited eye contact; PHQ-9=16
I: Behavioral activation and cognitive restructuring
R: Engaged, identified 2 pleasant activities
P: Activity schedule; check-in next week
GIRP Example:
G: Goal 1 - reduce avoidance behaviors
I: Exposure hierarchy planning
R: Patient agreed to first two steps
P: Practice exposure twice before next visit
Purpose: Formal documentation of treatment goals, objectives, interventions, and timeline.
Standard Components:
Identifying Information:
Problem List:
Goals:
Objectives:
Interventions:
Progress Measures:
Review Schedule:
Treatment Plan Template (Concise):
PROBLEM:
DIAGNOSIS:
GOAL:
OBJECTIVE 1:
Intervention:
Responsible:
Target Date:
OBJECTIVE 2:
Intervention:
Responsible:
Target Date:
MEASUREMENT:
REVIEW FREQUENCY:
Example (Condensed):
PROBLEM: Depressive symptoms with functional impairment
DIAGNOSIS: Major Depressive Disorder, Moderate
GOAL: PHQ-9 < 5 within 12 weeks
OBJECTIVE 1: 3 pleasurable activities/week by week 4
Intervention: Behavioral activation, weekly therapy
Responsible: Therapist
Target Date: [Date]
MEASUREMENT: PHQ-9 every 2-4 weeks
REVIEW FREQUENCY: Monthly
Best Practices (Expanded):
docs/references/documentation-standards.md for extended guidance.General Principles:
What to Include:
What to Avoid:
Timeliness:
Documentation of safety concerns is critical:
Required Documentation for Safety Issues:
Suicide Risk:
Violence Risk:
Child/Elder Abuse:
Safety Documentation Protocols (Expanded):
Documentation serves multiple purposes:
Balance competing demands:
Legal Considerations:
Cultural Considerations:
Electronic Health Records:
Additional Limitations and Considerations:
Documentation Standards:
Best Practices:
SOAP Note Format:
Additional References:
Status: ✅ Implemented Priority: LOW - Phase 3 Last Updated: 2026-02-03
まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。
概要と使いどころ
Complete architecture reference for the A3 insurance platform — file locations, data flow, conventions, microservice map, and fullstack patterns
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drafts U.S. commercial real estate access and indemnity (right-of-entry) agreements for pre-closing due diligence. Covers license grants, non-invasive vs invasive testing gates, insurance/endorsement requirements, indemnity with discovery carve-outs, restoration and lien remedies, confidentiality, and anti-indemnity guardrails. Trigger: access agreement, right of entry, due diligence access, Phase I/II, invasive testing, pre-PSA site inspection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
当用户需要对意外险投保问卷进行专业、结构化的核保审查,提取职业类别、工作环境、作业内容、危险活动参与情况、交通出行习惯、特殊工作暴露及其他可能影响意外险承保判断的高风险信息,并生成适合意外险核保、补问流转和风险分层处理的结构化分析结果时使用本 skill。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide actuarial analysis for insurance pricing. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with actuarial-analysis related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。