本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

bio-causal-genomics-colocalization-analysis

Test whether two traits share a causal variant at a genomic locus using Bayesian colocalization with coloc. Computes posterior probabilities for shared vs distinct causal variants between GWAS and eQTL signals. Use when determining if a GWAS signal and an eQTL share the same causal variant.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(5)

  • SKILL.md8.6 KB
  • examples/coloc_analysis.R2.2 KB
  • examples/coloc_susie.R2.2 KB
  • examples/regional_plots.R2.5 KB
  • usage-guide.md2.8 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Version Compatibility

Reference examples tested with: ggplot2 3.5+

Before using code patterns, verify installed versions match. If versions differ:

  • R: packageVersion('<pkg>') then ?function_name to verify parameters

If code throws ImportError, AttributeError, or TypeError, introspect the installed package and adapt the example to match the actual API rather than retrying.

Colocalization Analysis

"Test whether my GWAS signal and eQTL share the same causal variant" → Compute Bayesian posterior probabilities for five colocalization hypotheses (no association, trait-1-only, trait-2-only, distinct causal variants, shared causal variant) to distinguish true causal overlap from LD-driven coincidence.

  • R: coloc::coloc.abf() for approximate Bayes factor colocalization

Overview

Colocalization tests whether two association signals at the same locus are driven by the same causal variant. This distinguishes shared causality from coincidental overlap due to LD.

Five hypotheses tested by coloc:

  • H0: No association with either trait
  • H1: Association with trait 1 only
  • H2: Association with trait 2 only
  • H3: Both associated, different causal variants
  • H4: Both associated, shared causal variant

coloc.abf Analysis

Goal: Test whether two traits share a causal variant at a GWAS locus using Bayesian colocalization.

Approach: Format summary statistics for each trait as named lists, run coloc.abf to compute posterior probabilities for five hypotheses (H0-H4), and interpret PP.H4 as evidence for a shared causal variant.

library(coloc)

# --- Input format: named list with GWAS summary stats ---
# Required fields: beta, varbeta, snp, position, type, N
# type = 'quant' (continuous) or 'cc' (case-control)

gwas_data <- list(
  beta = gwas_df$BETA,
  varbeta = gwas_df$SE^2,
  snp = gwas_df$SNP,
  position = gwas_df$POS,
  type = 'cc',           # Case-control study
  s = 0.3,               # Proportion of cases (required for cc)
  N = 50000              # Total sample size
)

eqtl_data <- list(
  beta = eqtl_df$BETA,
  varbeta = eqtl_df$SE^2,
  snp = eqtl_df$SNP,
  position = eqtl_df$POS,
  type = 'quant',        # Quantitative trait (expression)
  N = 500,               # eQTL sample size
  sdY = 1                # SD of trait (1 if already normalized)
)

# --- Run colocalization ---
result <- coloc.abf(dataset1 = gwas_data, dataset2 = eqtl_data)

# Posterior probabilities
# PP.H4 > 0.8: Strong evidence for colocalization (shared variant)
# PP.H3 > 0.8: Distinct causal variants at the locus
# PP.H4 between 0.5-0.8: Suggestive but inconclusive
print(result$summary)

Prior Sensitivity

# Default priors: p1 = 1e-4, p2 = 1e-4, p12 = 1e-5
# p1: Prior probability a SNP is associated with trait 1
# p2: Prior probability a SNP is associated with trait 2
# p12: Prior probability a SNP is associated with both traits
#
# Ratio p12/p1 represents prior belief in colocalization
# Default: p12/p1 = 0.1 (10% of trait 1 SNPs also affect trait 2)

result_sensitive <- coloc.abf(
  dataset1 = gwas_data,
  dataset2 = eqtl_data,
  p1 = 1e-4,
  p2 = 1e-4,
  p12 = 5e-6    # More conservative prior for shared association
)

# Sensitivity analysis across prior values
sensitivity(result, 'H4 > 0.8')

Using P-values (No Beta/SE)

# When only p-values are available, use MAF to approximate
gwas_pval <- list(
  pvalues = gwas_df$P,
  MAF = gwas_df$MAF,
  snp = gwas_df$SNP,
  position = gwas_df$POS,
  type = 'cc',
  s = 0.3,
  N = 50000
)

result <- coloc.abf(dataset1 = gwas_pval, dataset2 = eqtl_data)

SuSiE-Coloc (Multiple Causal Variants)

Goal: Test colocalization at loci with multiple independent causal signals.

Approach: Run SuSiE fine-mapping on each dataset to identify credible sets, then test colocalization between all pairs of credible sets using coloc.susie.

library(coloc)
library(susieR)

# coloc.abf assumes a single causal variant per locus
# SuSiE-coloc handles multiple causal variants

# LD matrix required (correlation matrix from reference panel)
ld_matrix <- as.matrix(read.table('ld_matrix.txt'))

# Run SuSiE on each dataset
susie_gwas <- runsusie(
  list(beta = gwas_df$BETA, varbeta = gwas_df$SE^2,
       snp = gwas_df$SNP, position = gwas_df$POS,
       type = 'cc', s = 0.3, N = 50000, LD = ld_matrix),
  L = 10       # Max number of causal variants to search for
)

susie_eqtl <- runsusie(
  list(beta = eqtl_df$BETA, varbeta = eqtl_df$SE^2,
       snp = eqtl_df$SNP, position = eqtl_df$POS,
       type = 'quant', N = 500, sdY = 1, LD = ld_matrix),
  L = 10
)

# Coloc using SuSiE credible sets
result_susie <- coloc.susie(susie_gwas, susie_eqtl)
print(result_susie$summary)
# Each row tests colocalization between a pair of credible sets
# hit1, hit2: Credible set indices from dataset 1 and 2

HyPrColoc (Multi-Trait)

Goal: Test colocalization across three or more traits simultaneously to identify shared causal variant clusters.

Approach: Provide beta and SE matrices (SNPs x traits) to hyprcoloc, which clusters traits sharing a causal variant using a branch-and-bound algorithm.

# install.packages('remotes')
# remotes::install_github('jrs95/hyprcoloc')
library(hyprcoloc)

# Test colocalization across multiple traits simultaneously
# Input: matrices of betas and SEs (rows = SNPs, columns = traits)
betas <- cbind(gwas_df$BETA, eqtl1_df$BETA, eqtl2_df$BETA)
ses <- cbind(gwas_df$SE, eqtl1_df$SE, eqtl2_df$SE)
colnames(betas) <- colnames(ses) <- c('GWAS', 'eQTL_gene1', 'eQTL_gene2')
rownames(betas) <- rownames(ses) <- gwas_df$SNP

result_hypr <- hyprcoloc(
  effect.est = betas,
  effect.se = ses,
  trait.names = colnames(betas),
  snp.id = rownames(betas)
)

# Output: clusters of traits sharing a causal variant
print(result_hypr$results)

Input Preparation

# --- Extract a locus (1 Mb window around lead SNP) ---
extract_locus <- function(sumstats, lead_snp_pos, chr, window = 500000) {
  locus <- sumstats[sumstats$CHR == chr &
                    sumstats$POS >= (lead_snp_pos - window) &
                    sumstats$POS <= (lead_snp_pos + window), ]
  locus[order(locus$POS), ]
}

# --- Generate LD matrix from plink ---
# plink --bfile ref_panel --chr 6 --from-bp 30000000 --to-bp 31000000 \
#   --r square --out ld_matrix
# Read into R:
ld <- as.matrix(read.table('ld_matrix.ld'))

Visualization

library(ggplot2)

plot_coloc_locus <- function(gwas_df, eqtl_df, result) {
  pp4 <- round(result$summary['PP.H4.abf'], 3)

  p1 <- ggplot(gwas_df, aes(x = POS / 1e6, y = -log10(P))) +
    geom_point(alpha = 0.6) +
    labs(x = 'Position (Mb)', y = '-log10(P)', title = paste('GWAS | PP.H4 =', pp4)) +
    theme_minimal()

  p2 <- ggplot(eqtl_df, aes(x = POS / 1e6, y = -log10(P))) +
    geom_point(alpha = 0.6, color = 'steelblue') +
    labs(x = 'Position (Mb)', y = '-log10(P)', title = 'eQTL') +
    theme_minimal()

  library(patchwork)
  p1 / p2
}

LocusCompare Plot

# LocusCompare: scatter of -log10(P) for GWAS vs eQTL at shared SNPs
plot_locuscompare <- function(gwas_df, eqtl_df) {
  merged <- merge(
    gwas_df[, c('SNP', 'P')],
    eqtl_df[, c('SNP', 'P')],
    by = 'SNP', suffixes = c('.gwas', '.eqtl')
  )

  ggplot(merged, aes(x = -log10(P.gwas), y = -log10(P.eqtl))) +
    geom_point(alpha = 0.5) +
    geom_smooth(method = 'lm', se = FALSE, linetype = 'dashed', color = 'grey50') +
    labs(x = '-log10(P) GWAS', y = '-log10(P) eQTL', title = 'LocusCompare') +
    theme_minimal()
}

Decision Framework

PP.H4 > 0.8:  Strong colocalization -- traits share a causal variant
PP.H3 > 0.8:  Distinct causal variants -- LD-driven overlap, not shared causality
PP.H4 0.5-0.8: Suggestive -- increase sample size, try SuSiE-coloc
PP.H0/H1/H2 dominant: Insufficient signal at this locus

Common pitfalls:

  • Small eQTL sample sizes reduce power (N < 200 is problematic)
  • LD can inflate PP.H3 when two nearby causal variants exist -- use SuSiE-coloc
  • Always check that both traits have significant signals at the locus before running coloc

Related Skills

  • mendelian-randomization - Test causal effects using genetic instruments
  • fine-mapping - Identify causal variants and credible sets
  • population-genetics/linkage-disequilibrium - LD reference panels for SuSiE-coloc
  • differential-expression/deseq2-basics - Generate eQTL data for colocalization

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

adaptyv

無料

Cloud laboratory platform for automated protein testing and validation. Use when designing proteins and needing experimental validation including binding assays, expression testing, thermostability measurements, enzyme activity assays, or protein sequence optimization. Also use for submitting experiments via API, tracking experiment status, downloading results, optimizing protein sequences for better expression using computational tools (NetSolP, SoluProt, SolubleMPNN, ESM), or managing protein design workflows with wet-lab validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3,0632026年7月21日 更新

Time-blind friendly planning, executive function support, and daily structure for ADHD brains. Specializes in realistic time estimation, dopamine-aware task design, and building systems that actually work for neurodivergent minds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3,0632026年7月21日 更新

aeon

無料

This skill should be used for time series machine learning tasks including classification, regression, clustering, forecasting, anomaly detection, segmentation, and similarity search. Use when working with temporal data, sequential patterns, or time-indexed observations requiring specialized algorithms beyond standard ML approaches. Particularly suited for univariate and multivariate time series analysis with scikit-learn compatible APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3,0632026年7月21日 更新

Browse the web for any task — research topics, read articles, interact with web apps, fill forms, take screenshots, extract data, and test web pages. Use whenever a browser would be useful, not just when the user explicitly asks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3,0632026年7月21日 更新

AI驱动的综合健康分析系统,整合多维度健康数据、识别异常模式、预测健康风险、提供个性化建议。支持智能问答和AI健康报告生成。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3,0632026年7月21日 更新

alphafold

無料

Validate protein designs using AlphaFold2 structure prediction. Use this skill when: (1) Validating designed sequences fold correctly, (2) Predicting binder-target complex structures, (3) Calculating confidence metrics (pLDDT, pTM, ipTM), (4) Self-consistency validation of designs, (5) Multi-chain complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. For faster single-chain prediction, use esm. For QC thresholds, use protein-qc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FreedomIntelligence/OpenClaw-Medical-Skills3,0632026年7月21日 更新

FreedomIntelligence のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する