本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

finishing-a-development-branch

Use when verified work needs integration or cleanup of an existing task-created branch/worktree, or the user explicitly requests merge, PR, or branch lifecycle handling.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(1)

  • SKILL.md5.5 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Integration choice and checkout lifetime are separate. Verify first, mutate only task-owned resources, then prove what was removed or retained.

Core principle: fresh evidence -> authorized integration -> ownership-aware cleanup -> Git/path readback.

Announce at start: explain which branch/worktree lifecycle is being closed.

Step 1: Environment and Ownership Detection

Read the task's TaskStartSnapshot and current repository state. Record:

  • root, HEAD, branch/detached state, upstream divergence, and active Git ops;
  • staged/unstaged/untracked paths and the task-owned delta;
  • git worktree list --porcelain;
  • branch/worktree creator, task ownership, base branch, and cleanup trigger.

Stop on conflicts, unexplained detached state, failed verification, dirty/untracked state in a cleanup target, or unknown ownership. Do not infer the base from the names main or master; use task records, repository authority, or explicit user direction. Never auto-stash, reset, clean, pull, rebase, amend, force-push, or bypass hooks.

For a trusted host-managed detached checkout, follow the repository's approved managed-workspace contract: verify host binding, default cwd, root, and HEAD; then use its scoped local-commit and native handoff path. Report detached HEAD in the receipt. This exception does not authorize automatic deletion of the detached checkout or bypass unknown ownership/binding.

If no task-created branch/worktree exists and integration was not requested, skip this workflow: report the local task commit plus Task clean and Repository clean; do not invent merge/PR ceremony.

Step 2: Fresh Verification

Run the smallest current-authority test set that proves the completed task. If it fails, preserve all work and return to diagnosis. Do not present the branch as ready.

Step 3: Choose the Authorized Outcome

When a task branch actually needs disposition, present only applicable choices:

  1. merge into the recorded base locally;
  2. push and create/update a PR;
  3. keep the branch for later integration;
  4. discard the exact task-owned branch/worktree.

Push, PR, remote deletion, release, and force operations require explicit user authorization. Discard requires a fresh, exact typed confirmation naming branch, worktree path, and commits/delta to lose. Generic agreement is insufficient.

Step 4: Execute Without Hidden Mutation

Local merge

Verify the target checkout is safe, switch to the recorded base, merge without an implicit pull, and rerun verification on the merged result. If integration or verification fails, preserve both histories and stop.

Push or PR

Push only the authorized task branch and create/update the PR with summary and fresh test evidence. PR creation does not itself prove merge and does not require the temporary worktree to remain.

Keep branch

Retain the branch. Remove a clean task-created temporary worktree by default; retain it only for an explicit ongoing-checkout need and report why.

Discard

After exact confirmation, remove only the named clean task-owned worktree, then the named branch. If either differs from the confirmation, stop and ask again.

Step 5: Prove Integration Before Branch Deletion

Use evidence matching the merge strategy:

  • merge/fast-forward: prove the task tip is an ancestor of the recorded base;
  • squash/rebase: use fresh PR merge metadata plus strategy-appropriate patch equivalence (git cherry for rebased commits; stable patch-id or bounded changed-path/tree comparison for squashes), not an ancestor-only test;
  • unmerged/open PR: keep the branch unless discard was exactly confirmed.

Never delete a branch merely because a PR was opened or a similarly named commit exists.

Step 6: Cleanup in Dependency Order

For a clean task-owned resource:

  1. move to another safe registered checkout; never remove the current working directory;
  2. remove/unregister the worktree first with git worktree remove <exact-path>;
  3. read back git worktree list --porcelain;
  4. verify the exact path no longer exists;
  5. only then delete an integrated or exactly confirmed branch;
  6. read back branch refs, HEAD, and repository status.

Do not use routine --force, global git worktree prune, wildcard deletion, or cleanup of resources absent from the task ownership record. On Windows, Git may unregister a worktree while its directory remains locked: re-check registration and the exact resolved path, remove only a proven task-owned clean residual when safe, otherwise retain it and report the lock/path. Never widen deletion scope.

Final Git Receipt

Report:

  • current branch and commit SHA/message, or the reason no commit exists;
  • Task clean: yes|no and Repository clean: yes|no independently;
  • branch/worktree created, removed, or retained, with evidence/reason;
  • integration evidence and any remaining user action.

Task clean means no uncommitted task-owned delta remains. Repository clean means no staged, unstaged, or untracked repository state remains.

This is a local Git receipt, not authoritative completion or merge truth beyond the evidence read back.

Integration

Called only when branch/worktree integration or explicit lifecycle handling is in scope. Pairs with using-git-worktrees and verification-before-completion.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Use when touching retiring old logic, collapsing duplicate owners, removing fallbacks, or schema/persistence/source-of-truth boundaries; identify opportunities automatically; destructive execution requires explicit confirmation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GanyuanRan/Aegis1,3442026年10月12日 更新

Use when defining ambiguous or high-complexity new features, product behavior, UI/component design, architecture choices, contract changes, or when grilling/pressure-testing a plan or design. Routine small requests stay on the fast path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GanyuanRan/Aegis1,3442026年10月12日 更新

Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GanyuanRan/Aegis1,3442026年10月12日 更新

Use when facing 2+ independent tasks without a written plan, with no conflicting shared mutable state or sequential dependencies, where parallel delegation beats inline cost; otherwise inline. Planned tasks use subagent-driven-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GanyuanRan/Aegis1,3442026年10月12日 更新

Use when the user asks to establish shared project language, or project work exposes a conflicting, renamed, or deprecated domain term that needs active semantic modeling. Routine small tasks stay on the fast path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GanyuanRan/Aegis1,3442026年10月12日 更新

Use when executing a written implementation plan across sessions or with review checkpoints. Small or single-slice plans stay inline. For same-session independent tasks, use subagent-driven-development instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GanyuanRan/Aegis1,3442026年10月12日 更新

GanyuanRan のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する