本文へ移動
cccskills
無料GitHub で公開

context-templates

Shared context template library for setup-skills. Read when discovering context documents or their ownership. This library supplies research inputs, not active product context or a separate authoring workflow.

インストール方法を見る

含まれるファイル(8)

  • SKILL.md4.7 KB
  • ACCESSIBILITY.md1.9 KB
  • BROWSER-VALIDATION.md7.1 KB
  • DESIGN-SYSTEM.md5.7 KB
  • PRODUCT-DESIGN.md8.2 KB
  • REPOSITORY.md3.9 KB
  • RESPONSIVE-DESIGN.md1.7 KB
  • SEED-DATA.md2.3 KB

SKILL.md(原文)

インストールする前に、エージェントに与えられる指示の中身を確認できます。

Shared context templates

This directory is the only editable template library. It is copied with the starter beside .agents/skills/. Do not duplicate templates inside individual skills or infer approved context from templates themselves.

Documents and research sources

Plain setup selects every document below once. For a named consumer, read its required-context declaration, including any linked reference that owns that declaration, and select its required and conditional documents once. Do not maintain a second consumer dependency map here. Users can also name documents directly. This entrypoint is not itself a context document.

DocumentSource groups
DESIGN-SYSTEM.mddesign-system
PRODUCT-DESIGN.mdproduct
REPOSITORY.mdrepository
SEED-DATA.mdproduct, repository
RESPONSIVE-DESIGN.mdproduct
ACCESSIBILITY.mdproduct, repository
BROWSER-VALIDATION.mdrepository

Source groups identify research ownership. design-system and product select the six shared intake questions in setup-skills' references/source-workflow.md. The repository group selects automatic, bounded, read-only research of the current consumer checkout under that workflow, not a source/permission question. Repository-only selection needs no intake answers. Missing repository answers or file registrations do not block this local scope. Other groups' research is not automatically authorized by a file being local. Collect each applicable question once across selected documents. Preserve all restrictions and explicit skips, including legacy repository opt-outs, and honor content exclusions. Volunteered docs add leads, not a new required question. Bounded proposals live in PRODUCT-DESIGN.md and apply only where permitted, never as researched product policy. An empty source registry does not disable automatic local research. Excluded, missing or inaccessible evidence must produce specific limitations, not fictional facts or replacement research against a skip.

Optional owner topics

Keep all seven root identities. Authors may keep a document whole or move task-specific detail into directly linked owner topics when supported tasks can skip genuinely irrelevant detail. Choose boundaries by task applicability and cohesion: keep a decision's requirements, conditions, exceptions, examples and citations together. Keep short, cohesive guidance whole when splitting would only add navigation. Check evidenced consumer constraints, such as incoming anchors or a parser that requires a particular structure, before moving content; do not assume one consumer's constraints apply to others. Observed oversized or truncated reads can motivate review, but file size, consistency with other owners or a fixed topic count does not justify a split. Splitting alone does not establish faster discovery or better task outcomes. Preserve correct existing text and its authority and historical qualifications; relocation is not permission to rewrite policy or claim fresh verification. Do not physically split every template or add new owners, intake or authors. Roots retain authority, common rules, universal obligations, known gaps and direct links to every topic with concrete applicability conditions. New topics use the owner's exclusive topics/<DOCUMENT-STEM>/ directory within active context; existing linked paths need preservation and explicit inventory.

Each trigger covers normal successful work and readiness as well as relevant failure/recovery work. For example, supported component selection, opening and checking an ordinary preview, and adding valid fixtures must select their applicable details before a failure occurs. Avoid read-all lists and topic chains. Each topic keeps complete usable rules, examples, conditions, exceptions and citations. Shared-owner links transfer ownership, not duplicate policy.

Apply setup's complete-set authoring, preservation and approval contract to roots and topics together. Library templates are research prompts, not approved consumer guidance or permission to activate extra files.

Location

Setup reads this library from .agents/context-templates/ in the current prototype repository. It does not fetch or install another copy. Context documents become active only after separate explicit approval.

レビュー

まだレビューはありません。使ってみた感想をお寄せください。

同じリポジトリのスキル

概要と使いどころ

Audits actual components and routes against applicable WCAG 2.2 A/AA criteria using consumer-owned design-system evidence and repository tools. Use when asked for an accessibility audit, a11y check, keyboard or focus review, contrast check, or screen-reader verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica52026年10月16日 更新

Creates or updates believable deterministic raw fixture scenarios without breaking an existing prototype. Use when asked to add or change fixtures, seed data, sample data, scenarios, or cross-record relationships. Not for UI redesign, live-data infrastructure, or unrelated commands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica52026年10月16日 更新

Use for explicit agent-browser CLI checks or a named browser capability neither the Copilot canvas nor configured Playwright MCP can supply. Ordinary rendered checks and browser selection belong to browser-canvas-validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica52026年10月16日 更新

Use the Copilot browser canvas first for rendered route checks, interaction tests, screenshots and visual, responsive or accessibility evidence. Use configured isolated Playwright MCP only when the canvas is unavailable for a required check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica52026年10月16日 更新

Review Replica pull requests using the same shared conventions and project guides as implementation agents. Use when reviewing changes to code, tests, workflows, or documentation in this repository.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica52026年10月16日 更新

Reviews existing UI components for design-system consistency, states, responsiveness and accessibility using consumer-owned context. Use when asked to review component quality, check design-system adherence or audit component consistency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

github/replica52026年10月16日 更新

github のスキルをすべて見る

このスキルの問題を報告する